what percentage of rents are paid for by the tax payer through Housing Benefit? Be thankful they have low rents because in the private setor the HB bill would be far higher (part of the lunacy of wanting to hike some social housing rents to being on a par with private sector rents). I agree with you in that there are areas of HB that needed reforming a long time ago. The governments thinking on this is that by further capping, some landlords will be foreced to reduce rents. This may work in a place like Blackpool, where 70% of private rented sector rents are subsidised by HB (high unemployment and most jobs being low paid being the pfactors there), but in somewhere like London it's hard to see why landlord's would reduce rent. Also in the buy to let market, lanlords can't afford to reduce rents significantly because of their mortgage repayments, so we may see the resale of unprofitable properties, leading to a stabilisation of the Housing Market through over supply. In theory it could help the over inflation of the housing and rental market....but I'm sceptical. We'll have to wait and see what the impacts are, for better or worse. The 10% levy on the LTU has NO positive consequnce though. It's simply a measure that will put already poor people into further poverty, which in turn compounds things like mental health and further reduces their chances of ever finding employment. I'd also parallel that with the move to put those with any non terminal or severe physical disibility onto ESA for a year after which they are moved onto JSA irregardless of their health. Many vulnerable people are going to find themselves within a system that not only can not cater for their needs but in which they will find it difficult to cope.