Narnia

Is there a good way to fall down in a vat of botox gg?

Right, so Sean meant ?700K not million, yet repeated it. There's a big difference.

Thanks for that Pearson though I believe I did have an idea how that worked. Thus if money wasn't spent needlessly less would be required next year and council tax could be reduced. So, no department is going to say their budget was too much and we get loads of roadworks at this time of the year to make sure all of it is spent. CPRd was not in a particularly bad condition that I'm aware of. Seems like there is noone to have to justify this to. Politics yeah!

matthew123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Let us just agree then Narnia that Spurs will do > their usual handbag performance when they play > United I'd be delighted though I seem to remember they were 2 up last season at OT before the ref intervened and brought MU back into it.

matthew123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Of Spurs remaining fixtures I only see them > collecting 3 points against Bolton, and 1 at > Sunderland. > > Sunderland v Tottenham > Tottenham v Arsenal They can't win this? > Tottenham v Chelsea They can't win this? > Man Utd v Tottenham > Tottenham v Bolton > Man City v Tottenham They can draw this! > > For Liverpool what I have put in brackets > > Liverpool v Sunderland (3) > Birmingham v Liverpool (1) > Liverpool v Fulham (3) > Liverpool v West Ham (3) > Burnley v Liverpool (0) Who loses at Burnley? (apart from ManU) > Liverpool v Chelsea (1) > Hull v Liverpool (0 )Can't win at Hull? > > Which by my calculations means they will finish on > same points as Spurs and it will be decided on > goal difference, which based on number of forecast > wins and defeats should mean the Reds pip Spurs. > > EDITED to say I forgot Spurs last game of season > away at Burnley, so that makes Spurs by a margin > of 3 points! I'd forget your calculations Matthew. I think they are all over the place.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mr Walsh renumeration > > approx Where did you get that figure from Sean? Who the fu*k is paid ?700M a year?

giggirl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Wonderful stuff Narnia. Are they available for > bar mitzvahs? > > Px I suspect they are available for anything giggirl! Book us please

SeanMacGabhann Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I repeat - a company losing 700 million a year > could look at it's head, paid 700 million a year > and come up with options > > cutting one's cloth can take many forms Who is paid ?700M a year?

Is not the bottom line that a loss making company will go bust if it doesn't cut it's cloth according to the prevailing economic conditions. BA staff will have no jobs to go to if they don't wake up. These days a job is better than no job.

Lost where? Someone has it.

I was listening to the radio last night where there was a phone in on the subject. For whatever reason an 8 year old boy was on air way past his bedtime. However he did amuse me by referring twice to Willie Walsh as Louis.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Narnia Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > A bit more of Derek > > > > Enjoy lads! There's plenty more. > > I've changed my mind. Shoot him! I'm not so sure now Jah. He's developing a bit of a fan club you can see.

Who are you?

A bit more of Derek Enjoy lads! There's plenty more.

Maybe in the mail room?

If you haven't you should read some of the comments underneath it!

Getting out of IKEA.

Shopping in IKEA especially when the other half thinks we are in Disneyland.

...........along with the Celtic Tiger. This is so bad it's nearly funny!

CAB for Katie!

I agree with Keef. Sometimes we don't see the obvious even if it's in front of us. Why should not seeing an option on here exclude one from being an excellent employee? The other point I would make is that many users post here while they are at work. Perhaps they should all be sacked, and those seeking employment excluded on the grounds of being an EDF poster!

Wrestling

I really don't think it's anything to do with the guys renewing the road surface but those who organise the said renewing. My complaint is that for two days the road (or part of) was effectively closed off without any work being done on it.That's poor management. No further comment to make as it is a really boring subject.

Well Jah leaps in when he feels like it, so did I. I haven't accused him of having rabies.Calling someone sanctimonious is hardly a compliment. In fact it's almost the opposite given the context.I think Jah is well able to speak for himself though Brum.

RosieH Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ooh Narnia, no, you really didn't just do that. Oh > no no no no no. I presume I did RosieH, whatever that was?