steveo

I went to the Hepworth house the other day. This was a sad reminder

I smell lycanthropy

I'm intrigued Seabag. What is it, meth?

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When you looked at the baby born a day after you > in the maternity ward and thought "Oh God, another > @#$%&..." > > ETA Oh, apparently the phrase that rhymes with > toe-win gets edited! I've read this a few times Rendel... but no. Nothing.

rahrahrah: What would you have her do? Louisa: Why would you want her position weakened?

It was on the market and maybe still is, but I don't think he's in a rush. I wish it wasn't but as he explained (looking out on a rainy, cold Lordship Lane) 'I 'ave an house in Grasse and a boat in the Med. What would you do?'

Very unpleasant rat boxes

'Anyway May refuses to cost Brexit' Even Stephen Hawking and Mystic Meg couldn't cost Brexit JohnL

Unless there's a policeman standing between the assailant and the victim how exactly would a police presence help?

You don't see flair anywhere in politics these days. Maybe it's a function of my advanced age or that if you pay peanuts you get monkeys. I guess the death of the great ideologies has taken the blood and guts out of politics. They are all just bookkeepers these days. However a dull plodder like May is probably what we need right now.

What's the point of points on knives?

NHS: 'It can't go on as it is and throwing more money at it is not the answer...' is a mantra we hear a lot these days and it presages a change that only a thumping majority for the Tories would allow them to attempt. We all have anecdotes about the wonderful/shocking - usually wonderful - treatment we've received at the hands of the NHS but I've heard some corkers recently (from practitioners) about appalling waste and their paranoid fear of being sued that leads to arse covering, over prescribing, doling out unnecessary antibiotics etc, and about undeserving, demanding, insulting, violent 'patients' that lead me to think the mantra is right. It can't go on. Anyway, my original point was about the routine, rabid demonisation of the Tories, which apart from being a huge YAWN, is pretty irrational IMO.

Whatever happens, it won't be 'gone' Joe (mate)

Conservative voters, of which there will be many on this forum, rarely poke their heads above the parapet here or elsewhere these days, despite the fact their party will probably sweep all before it this June. It's just not worth the lorry load of opprobrium that would inevitably be tipped on their heads by those who think that a vote for the Tories = the end of the NHS and the imminent introduction of conscription. There will also be UKIP'ers among us but they live in the shadows

Good luck

Don't be sorry for her, she's a dope and she's got form. She may have been programmed to say 'rigged' but isn't there anything else in the Labour 'manifesto'? If Ms. Butler's got any sense(?), she'll take gardening leave but those expenses are just so damned addictive.

This one will have you rolling in your aisle Quids http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39659304

titch juicy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What has she done to make anyone believe she'll be > the moderating hand on the arm of Trump? I'll be > delighted if i'm wrong, but from what i've seen > she's sucking up to him to try and get a > favourable trade deal post brexit. I think I mean potential conduit. One thing she is is cautious and I think if the shite starts heading in the direction of the fan, we might be glad Jeremy won't be involved

From another perspective, if she's to be the moderating hand on the arm of that loon in the White House, maybe we should all come together to make she gets in at all costs

That's because High is the adjective I'll be out of my grammatical depth in a minute, if not already red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > steveo Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Although, I suppose, if you are employing the > > argot of the yoot and are countenancing > > 'shout-out' as the noun, then I concede > > Yep, it's like High Five, you don't have Highs > Five...

Although, I suppose, if you are employing the argot of the yoot and are countenancing 'shout-out' as the noun, then I concede

Yes I have heard of the word plural before In this case though, the plural is the shouts

It's not often you're right but you're wrong again https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/shout_out Noun[edit] shout out (plural shouts out)

Now is that a real name? Just asking. By the way, shouldn't the subject header read 'Positive Shouts Out?' -Pedant

Eight Mick!