Alan Medic

Eddie did defend himself by saying he had to leave 25 players at home. WC is a bit soon to be changing coach now isn't it. Stuart Lancaster anyone? According to the summary of a programme coming up on BT Sport yesterday, his Leinster won the Champions Cup. Perhaps Leo Cullen is available!

Robert Poste's Child Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I have a shower a day. I reckon that's more > than > > your average woman. > > Really? You must be mixing with some grubsters. > It's two showers a day if you want to be nice to > be near though: one in the morning, one at night. I can't say as I don't know what a grubster is. I looked it up and that didn't help much.

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Change the date on the thread Mike That didn't sound as polite as it was meant to be.

I have a shower a day. I reckon that's more than your average woman.

Change the date on the thread Mike

*clears the cobwebs* Enjoyed last weeks matches and I have to say England losing did tickle me, given the lead they had. Today Ireland v Australia was great, but really Ireland should have won this easily. Great Aussie defence but should not have been so close in the end.

I'm less excited about this WC than any before. Maybe I've seen too many as 1970 was the highlight. My support for my country of residency appears to flow with how the tabloid headlines are treating them. If they are OTT when England win a game it puts me off, but when they are slated for losing a game I feel sorry for them and the manager. I like this England squad mainly because it doesn't contain 'stars'. That's not to say it doesn't contain some very good players. I suspect the manager is out of his depth but I hope I'm wrong as he is a nice guy. Good luck to them.

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Scots are revolting...:) They're not that bad!

amuiphoto Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seriously, have you nothing better to talk about > than a 40th birthday party that went on 'til > 2am... FFS! And you wrote about it...........

It's been there a while.

Isn't No Deal a distinct possibility as there is no way of resolving the Irish border question without going back of their word or upsetting the DUP? Mind you I'm still hoping the whole thing will collapse a bit like a game of Jenga.

Apparently there were 15+ Tory 'rebels'. Enough to have changed the result. Kicking the can down the road.

What a title for a thread! http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1942791

A couple of small points regarding the NHS. Most of us pay National Insurance, so you can't say the NHS is free. We pay for it. The budget to spend on homeopathy which was small,has been dropped entirely.

May is only looking lonely (if that's what it is) because she is no craic and has been programmed only to say certain sentences. I'd be bored too even if she is PM.

I don't want to be a spoilsport, but if you knew something at the time which might have helped you, when would you ever learn anything from the experience?

What do bark chippings do? I buy them in a pet shop in Lewisham for the snake I inherited from my son.

Well in Ireland they had one recently and for the most part it went very well. But they have a constitution and to alter it they are obliged to have a referendum. That seems perfectly correct. They do have a part to play in the right circumstances. Here though it was all about party politics.

Error........ah go on

Paste

JoeLeg Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Look, people can march as much as they like, but > realistically we all know it?s not going to be put > to a public vote again. > > I think marches etc are fine for purposes of > keeping public pressure on government, but I hope > no one is kidding themselves that it will actually > to any kind of referendum, plebiscite or vote. Nor > should it, to my mind (and everyone is free to > tell me I?m wrong). We elect officials to lead the > country, and this is part of it. The final deal > will be so complex that there?s no way the whole > of the voting public can be expected to comprehend > it in enough detail to render a considered vote. > That?s not to call people stupid, just that this > is a sodding complex issue way beyond the realms > of Twitter. > > I?m still really angry that the govt has been so > idiotic thus far, and part of me hopes the whole > thing is a clever Trump-esque ?method in our > madness? scheme, and not the amateur hour it > appears to be so far. > > We?re going to be arguing about it for a long time > regardless... Joe, to extract the country from the EU is a complex issue (as you say) which the current government has shown itself incapable of dealing with due to TM having to deal with the different factions in her own party. I for one have no confidence that they are capable of deciding what is best for the country, when in my opinion they are deciding what is best for each of them individually. If it's a case of a 'people's vote' or parliament deciding, I will accept it. This is on the proviso that MP's are not whipped into voting one way or another.Leaving will be a disaster in my opinion. A free vote after debate is the best option. Then at least the UK will get the country it deserves.

What is the point of this? Are people protesting about not being able to ride naked?

DadOf4 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Anybody going along on the 23rd June ? > https://www.open-britain.co.uk/biggest_ever_pro_eu > ropean_march_to_be_held_on_23rd_june_for_a_people_ > s_vote I've never been on a march in my life, but I may start here.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > JohnL Wrote: > > > > > > > > And David Davis has threatened to resign > today > > > over the "backstop" being time limited - May > > wants > > > it time limited but with no specific time > > (typical > > > May) > > > > I think it's the other way round. > > Confused, you won't be after this weeks episode of > Brexit. Confused.You or me?

JohnL Wrote: > > And David Davis has threatened to resign today > over the "backstop" being time limited - May wants > it time limited but with no specific time (typical > May) I think it's the other way round.