rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rather well said Louisa, I'm completely atheist > and have absolutely no belief in ghosts > whatsoever, but it does seem odd that the belief > that a chap 2000 years ago was the son of God, or > that a chap in the desert 1400 years ago had a > direct line to the Almighty, is OK but other > non-approved manifestations of the supernatural > are unacceptable! Great thread. I'd love to know if anyone mocking the possible existence of ghosts goes to church or follows a religion. Anyway,question for Rendel. Why would you call yourself an atheist when you could say agnostic? Surely the former is putting all your eggs in one basket and the latter is a case of just don't know. On a ghostly note, I have a quite sane brother who says one visited him in his bedroom years ago in Sacramento. He was living with a US cousin who was a cop. He checked the premises and confirmed that no one had entered it from the outside. I don't believe or disbelieve him. He saw something no doubt. But was it real then begs the next question, is anything we see 'real'?