edhistory

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06471361/filing-history

Barclays are only leaseholders of the Lordship Lane building.

It happens. And yes, developers' lawyers do read the small print. Some are chancers too, but there is no evidence of this here. You should not jump to conclusions. I did not spend ?3, but I might be tempted to do so for 135 Rye Lane. Does anyone know what happened to the putative Grade II listing application for the Khan's building? You can suggest something about the "passageway" or you could obtain the evidence from the Title Plan for ?3. I prefer evidence to unfounded suggestions. Did you read how the "passageway" is classified by the Valuation Office Agency? John L Whoops. That should read John K

Details of an easement should be found in the title deed., but this is not always the case. To find out will cost ?3.

The Valuation Office Agency entry doesn't help very much. http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/valuation/2010/9632247000/7680229000 http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/valuation/2010/9287344000/8112075000

No, I'm saying, although I may be wrong, that on any refurbishment/rebuild, the entire ground floor, as bounded by the red line, can only be used for A1 Retail. John K

They are not block buildings (go look). They are an important part of England's architectural heritage. They may even be a sole survivor. You will have read the Historic England contribution which is even dumber than that written for Railway Rise. John K

The elegant art deco buildings which have no concrete blocks (go take a look) will be demolished despite being protected frontages.

http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9563201

Here's an extract from one of the Protected Frontages maps. The document itself is interesting in its own right. It is the only Southwark Council document I have seen that bears the official Corporation Seal. This may be because it is a legal de-rogation of an Act of Parliament. Is there any lawyer here who can clarify this? 133 Rye Lane is fully a "Protected Frontage" (as is Station Arcade). I don't think the red line can be gerrymandered to provide a Bussey Building passage. John K

> My only query would be what their circa ?10k of debtors How about the tangible assets?

It was good in the 1960s too. Southwark Council are putting the pub into an Archaeological Protection Zone (APZ).

The extra two floors are out of street sight-line. More interesting is the Khan's overhang. One "person" owns both buildings? The Rye Lane street-level frontage is "protected" and should not be used for Bussey Building access. John K

That's a really funny article. Next someone will claim this will badly affect Peckham Woods. The comments on Southwark's web-site are good for a laugh too. Who is the beneficial owner of the Bussey Building? John K

pork chop Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It came from the existing community because Bold Tendancies are already there https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/07662828

The maximum BSI gradient is 1:12. What is it for the proposed Coal Line?

Peckham Society News Issue 142 Autumn 2015 page 18. It's good to see that Station Arcade has at long last been recognised as an integral element in the unique "Peckham Art Deco quarter". The article says the buildings were designed under the supervision of James Robb Scott (1882-1965). Nice comment about the Crittall windows too. John K

You would probably get greater support if you re-named the campaign "Save Nunhead Woods".

Has the raft of documentation exposed the beneficial owner?

This is like the "Southwark Woods" template.

http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/valuation/2010/9633919000/7898453000

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/05651354/filing-history

52 Grove Vale was as launderette.

North Cross Road adjacent to what is now Emily's.

LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Its going to be and M&S and the > last update was its scheduled to open summer 2016. Has this ever been verified?