edhistory

Mark Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > edhistory Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Check the interface? > > Could you explain what that means please? What > interface? This is the error screen: https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200171936-Error-520-Web-server-is-returning-an-unknown-error

Got a CloudFlare screen. Check the interface? John K

HopOne Did you read what you wrote before posting? John K

You've lost me now. Are you saying that the northern slope of One Tree Hill is not One Tree Hill? Can you clarify why the phrase "virgin woodland" has been used? John K

I have a water colour of the missing Hepworth. A copy has been provided to Dulwich Picture Gallery. Please contact me if you would like me to email you a scan. John K

Has a document been published to help monitor the progress of the 2013/14 awards?

The new lamp post on the corner is still standing.

nxjen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'd be interested to learn how old woodland has to > be to be defined as historic. Here is a picture > of One Tree Hill taken in 1905 - no woodland > there. I have a slightly earlier picture than the Nisbet. This shows One Tree Hill from Peckham Rye Common. I count three trees. The Nisbet also has a map of the fields on our side of One Tree Hill.

HopOne Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not so. There are 2 cemeteries involved and there > is some historic woodland on One Tree Hill that is > under threat. Is this the "virgin woodland"?

Has this imperialism included talking with the Friends of One Tree Hill?

There is a degree of disinformation in that document. Is it known who wrote it? John K

Today is the anniversary of the Hell Of High Wood.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I am very concerned about moves to attempt to > further en-forest what has traditionally been > meadowland in Camberwell Old Cemetery. Have you seen this: http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/object/4590467108 Make your own judgment about these people. John K

Have a read of the Southwark Council guidance document "Design and access statements" (2007). I would expect the Coal Line Project to have discussed the requirements with Southwark Building Control and Southwark Planning before launching a crowd funding exercise. Both have been known to offer free pro bono advice for a public realm project. Southwark Council may say that the project is unlikely to get permmision or has a very high indicative cost. Then the project can decide whether to do crowd funding. My question stands. Has the planning application been submitted? John K

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1573243

anoTher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh dear me Grok, you are a very disillusioned > person. I assume you live on MB and have young > children? There is FYI no campaign outright for a > barrier, simply a reduction in rat-running and > speeding. If any of you could be bothered to > communicate in a civil manner with those of us > who've instigated the campaign you may begin to > understand that we don't want a solution which > will inconvenience surrounding areas, hence why > many hours of doorstepping has been undertaken. > Guys, it's not rocket science! http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1573243

The site was de-rated for business rates pretty promptly after demolition: http://www.2010.voa.gov.uk/rli/en/basic/find/assessment-history/2010/15718707000

On 31/03/2012 Southwark Council booked in a ?982,599 Section 106 planning gain. Does this now get "un-booked"? Section 106 Annual Report 2011-12 Page 21

tomdhu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > edhistory Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > I don't think it was ever established whether > > Alleyn's or James Allen's have many local > pupils. > > > EDH, > > We live on East Dulwich Grove and our two lads > attend Alleyns, having previously attended DVI and > Hamlet. How much more local do you want to get? > > Tom Thanks, Tom. That's 2 children out of c985 who will not be using the new pedestrian crossing. John K

The final voluntary liquidation report for East Dulwich Garden Centre Ltd shows that the developer paid ?1.25m for the site.

I think the original thread has been deleted. For those who like to keep track of these things: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08886454/filing-history

The Mayor of London has to be able to read and understand legal documents before signing them.

It is difficult to see the economic viability of a wine bar in that location. Have you ever visited the court? John K

I was wondering whether these were Dulwich Village children. Or commuters from North Dulwich station. I don't think it was ever established whether Alleyn's or James Allen's have many local pupils.

Were the chidren East Dulwich children?