edhistory

Did anyone read this group's material on groundwater contamination?

Who is the person from Southwark Council Building Control who is responsible for this site?

Any progress since last year in getting permission for this wall? John K

If you think there are fraudulent invoices you should report the matter to the police.

MirandaS Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for the advice.... What is LVT? > > Now got the responsive repairs summary and there > are two charges for ?521.83 marked as high > performance back door?? My property does not have > a back door and the flat downstairs has not had a > door replaced. Then there is a charge of 196.58 > for reglaze? And lastly ?212.58 for annual repairs > overhead allocation to the block but no repairs > were untaken. > > Can anyone advise how I challenge this? > > Thanks M Report it to the police. John K

Have Labour Party representatives been instructed not to participate in the EDF?

> Mothers could drop and shop. Maternity ward planned?

It matters if the road improvement projects are entirely run by externals. Who is the Southwark Council directly employed intelligent customer? Is it Mr Clement Agyei-Frempong? John K

Does the Dulwich Society Transport (Sub) Committee have a view?

Ian Batcock who is a certified SoSRA who works for AECOM Ltd could do a safety audit.

cella Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > She is the most senior person in that area. I would GUESS that her line-manager is the Director of Public Realm [sic].

The next step is to identify Deborah Collins' line-manager?

I think this question has been asked before but got swamped and no answer came. This is a good time to ask again. Who employs Chris Mascord and who pages his wages? John K

At the meeting were ther any plans of the possible Court Lane - Dekker Road - Woodwarde Road - Calton Avenue gyratory system?

Can you take a folder for the dossier? John K

@Woodwarde Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think you should post this to the Townley thread > also. The road development at Townley has had > some new traffic light funationality which links > it to this junction. I am not sure it is fully > operational but it is intended to be. That may be > the cause. This may be the traffic from Village Way unexpectedly "getting stuck" in the yellow box caused by a sudden back-up in East Dulwich Grove as a result of the new Townley Road junction.

I thought the two developers needed to obtain and pay for licenses. Have they? Should they be retrospectively billed? Is photo the F.M.Conway roller good enough and at the right time to provide evidence to issue a parking ticket?

Several people have pointed out to me that the southern terminus junction with Lordship Lane would be very dangerous left "un-treated". Junction roadworks to in introduce saftey features will be required. John K

Ian Batcock is a certified SoSRA who works for AECOM Ltd. F.M.Conway AECOM Ltd is jointly owned (50/50) by F.M.Conway Ltd and AECOM Ltd. He has done an independent safety audit of the new works.

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Who?! Googling didn't help, before anyone suggests > it :)) Sue, Ian Batcock is a certified SoSRA who works for AECOM Ltd. He is certified to conduct a safety audit on the dangerous surface that caused your accident. F.M.Conway AECOM Ltd is jointly owned (50/50) by F.M.Conway Ltd and AECOM Ltd. There should be no difficuly getting Ian Batcock to do an independent safety audit of the new works. John

This Ian Badcock: Edit. Sorry. That should read Ian Batcock.

Send in Ian Batcock.

Ian Batcock has been certified.

Thank you again, holymoly. This is getting confusing. I thought that the contract was given to these people (see attchment). John K

holymoly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A stage 3 audit is due on works completion but > because they are not complete, an independent > interim report has been produced as noted above > but it has not yet been released to Councillors. > A Village Cllr asked Southwark two weeks ago for > this to be sent out to residents and is chasing > early release. Thanks for uploading this. In which sense is it independent? John K