edhistory

mikeb Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Two interesting mentions of Southwark Council here > - click on bottom right photo to enlarge. > > http://www.mynproperties.com/index.php/about-myn1 Oh what sharp eyes you have. What does this on the MYN Properties web-site mean? "Our partners: VAN OS Architecture [...] Southwark Building Control"

dds29 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Give & Take closed (see original post) because > their rent tripled. They'd been there 5 years. Not according to the estate agent details from when Ralon closed and the current sale particulars.

> 650km of roads And how many kilometres have trees?

> ?154,171 D Collins Strategic Director of Environment and Leisure Is this the person responsible for the F.M.Conway contract?

Thank you to the Metropolitan Police for closing the South Circular road across the Two Minutes Silence. Thank you to the Deeper Life Bible Church for the service and providing the music for the hymns.

Penguin68 and mynamehere, Mr Smith is correct. Personally I was a lttle disappointed there was no Liberal Democrat wreath this year. John Kennedy

.

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06296402/filing-history Are these they.

What are the names of the council employees who allegedly condone this?

Was it a charity? John K

Is there a lawyer in the house? Do the secret council employees have a potential personal legal liability in these circumstances? John K

LondonMix Wrote: > > Why > > develop a few flats on a plot of land worth 1 > > million quid when you can sell the land and use > > that 1 million quid to develop much more > housing on cheaper land elsewhere in the borough. > Where is this cheaper land?

LondonMix Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why > develop a few flats on a plot of land worth 1 > million quid when you can sell the land and use > that 1 million quid to develop much more housing > on cheaper land elsewhere in the borough. Where is this cheaper land?

spider69 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Because I would like to see the ugly concrete > pillboxes that front and surround the station > pulled down and have a pleasant usable space in > their place instead of the dirty dank space that > is there. There are no pillboxes and very little concrete. Why don't you visit the buildings to see how they are constructed? John K

> Officers had also told me that they've made it clear to Conways that leaving materials for such lengths of time after completing works isn't acceptable - lets see it things improve. Is it breach of contract that should incur a financial penalty? John K

Unless something has changed, the red dotted line is the boundary. John K

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1592974,1592982#msg-1592982 It is proposed to place it in an Archaeological Protection Zone.

> Council Officers are happy Who are they?

If I read the council documents correctly, destruction of a protected frontage will not get planning pemission Watch out for a change in the rules. Why are you in the vandal camp? John K .

I was asked to post this planning decision in the context of Railway Rise John K http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1521885,1592618#msg-1592618

Any news on the NNE gradients?

One part of Southwark Council wants to preserve Station Arcade. One part of Southwark Council wants to vandalise it. Follow the money.

Interesting that Southwark Council plan to stop demolition: New Southwark Plan Preferred Option Appendix 3 Primary and secondary protected shopping frontages SF26 now SF1 43-125 (odd) Rye Lane Units 1-10 (con) & Units 12-18 (con), Aylesham Centre, Rye Lane 1-5 (con) Central Buildings, Rye Lane 2-82 (even) Rye Lane 127-149 (odd) Rye Lane 151-175 (odd) Rye Lane 84-114 (even) Rye Lane 116a-150 (even) Rye Lane SF26 now SF30 2-10 (even) Blenheim Grove 3, 4, 5, 10, 12 & 14 Station Way, Rye Lane 2-38 (even) Peckham High Street 177-239 (odd) Rye Lane 249-265 (odd) Rye Lane 275-295 (odd) Rye Lane 152-204 (even) Rye Lane 206-232 (even) Rye Lane 24-68 (even) Rye Lane 2-4 (even) Atwell Road 2-46 (even) Choumert Road 1-7 The Market (odd) Choumert Road 1-7 Choumert Road

What are the break clauses in the F.M.Conway contract?

The Conway AECOM letter of 28 October says: "The duration of the works specified above is only indicative" This paragraph then goes on to explain "their" policy on road markings with detail about "H-bar" policy. The Conway contract manager for these works is Taran Omer whose direct line is quoted as 0330-337 1001. John K