edhistory

giggirl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Because a lot of houses in this area didn't have > inside toilets when they were built. Interesting. Which properties can you identify? Does it apply in this case? > It's about reconfiguring existing > space for modern living. Destruction to satisfy a personal preference. John K

rafsta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We are not living in the 19th century anymore I had not noticed this. > A kitchen extension is improving the architectural > heritage not destroying it ? John K

Why do people choose to move into an area and then destroy its architectural heritage? John K

This looks the be the right sort of wall. John K

Well at least this is at an appropriate location. John K

I visited the next valley today and went through Dulwich Village. Quite a few suitable blank walls, but no art? Is there a problem? John K

http://londonmodeltramways.webs.com/dogkennelhillmodel.htm John K

holloway Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > there are bats living in the small wood behind > sainsbury's. on the notice board by it there is > info regarding nature walks in and around it. it > 's a fantastic little wooded area and quite > bio-diverse with loads of different flora and > fauna. check it out. perhaps not at night though. I don't remember any mention of resident bats in recent planning applications. Did I miss something? John K

No public money then? John K

Waste of paint. John K

Front garden destroyed? John K

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The rationale. > Currently for every ?1 of comission and revenue > towards their operating costs they spend ?1.48. > Clearly this isn't sustainable. The accounting mysteries of allocating a "share" of central overheads to a branch office. John K

Are you an extra-territorial? John K

Food for donkeys? John K

I hoped the mysterious and fragile-looking cameras on EDG might be to track plates of the many cyclists who swish on past pedestrians waiting on the zebra crossings. Mouthing a sorry to me as you speed past? Grrrr.

DaveR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > In 2009 DoT recorded 271 accidents involving > pedestrian and cyclist and c.19,000 involving > pedestrian and car. Sanity check required. John K

It would be a pity to destroy this attractive inter-war frontage. It's almost art deco. John K

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > . I agree. John K

Italianate architecture so Italian name for the "square". http://www.transportheritage.com/find-heritage-locations.html?sobi2Task=sobi2Details&sobi2Id=841 John K

?the Primrose Hill of Peckham? ? John K

Frenchpolisher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If calm, polite people feel they > can ignore the rules, what hope is there? Not "rules", but bye-laws, subject to a penalty and criminal record on conviction. John K

http://www.southwark.gov.uk/download/6454/dog_ban_and_dogs_on_leads_byelaws Has there ever been a conviction? John K

I had to explain to my children about Scammells: http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6122/6007881893_67f6ac918c_z.jpg John K

Also worth checking with the Southwark Local Studies Library whether their Csmberwell Parish Tithe Survey material has preserved the original names(s) of the field(s). John K

How much will it cost to have this "petition" discussed? John K