edhistory

mikeb Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think Domino's displays neither art nor deco. > At most, maybe Streamline Moderne? This morning I was driven around the most obscure of East Dulwich backstreets in search of remnants of Streamline Moderne. Zilch. The Grove Vale building seems to be the sole survivor and we should treasure it.

jaywalker Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Au revoir.

The B2C law changed at the beginning of this month. It's probably a good idea to do some reading before progressing further.

There are 21 references to the Isle of Man in the Legislation. Gibraltar is at Schedule 6 of the Legislation. Never trust a UK government web-site summarising the law. Especially not HMRC.

Or is it the Cloudflare certificate?

Jacqui5254 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > On reflection, I'd give Alleyn Park a miss, > edhistory. > > As womanofdulwich said...'it's on Rosendale > Rd'.. > Thank you again. I went to West Dulwich this morning. A little disappointed the banners are so flimsy and won't last very long. I could not get a decent shot at the West Dulwich vermin.

Lots of unsubstantiated information above signifying nothing. This is what counts: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/61

Most of the Camberwell Borough Council pre-1945 housing stock was funded by 60-year Municipal Bonds.

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The velocipede appeared in 1865, and had pedals > applied to the front wheels. Thank you for the two pictures of velocipedes and the confirmation that bone-shakers were not cycles.

These are street advertisements if they are not for hire, even when they are parked in an approved bay.

alice Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > a simple 'Oi' might have sufficed. How does this work?

I had to look up the meaning of velocipede. It was not defined in S100 of the Local Government Act 1888. It appears to mean a wheeled vehicle that is capable of transporting a human and is powered by a human but not through a transmission chain. Scooters, skake boards and roller skates appear to be examples of velocipedes. Can anyone elucudate?

Is the Oakhurst Grove one a fully liveried Zip-Car that is suspected of being used as advertising? Mr Barber (IIRC) had some success in having advertising vehicles remove from East Dulwich Road.

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > The Tories' hard Brexit is dead (maybe even Brexit > itself) > I heard on the radio that the Article 50 timetable makes a "hard" Brexit more likely.

Which local schools are advising their pupils to break the law?

Unidentified radio commentatrix said Mrs May got the election date wrong. She should have selected 15 May when the university and polytechnic students would have returned home.

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Lets not forget some pavements have cycle paths or > shared use on them. > Are there any exclusive or shared cycle paths on pavements in any of the four wards that cover East Dulwich?

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > [...] in jeopardy by the Blitz and the V weapons. [...] I wonder if Ms Cameron has seen the WWII bomb damage map.

This does not appear to be in the legislation you quoted. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/13/contents

So, it is illegal. Thanks for the clarification Mr Barber.

Interesting opinions. Is it illegal as stated in the cyclelaw reference?

The www.cyclelaw.co.uk URL above says this: "Cycling on the pavement is currently illegal in UK law."

ianr Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Southwark public notice announcing the Rye > Lane plans is available at > http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/downloads/download/3 > 116/frequently_requested_traffic_orders. The > actual TMOs are attached to the response to > https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/en/request/traffic_ > management_orderplan_for. Or is the actual > cycleway later than 2010? Thanks for these leads, Ian. I'll follow them up at the weekend. I may even find out which Southwark Council employee was responsible.

peckman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > for gods sake everyone . give it a rest . there > are more important things to worry about. This thread is about the campaign to deny local people local burials.

Thanks for the information on locations. No map (?) so I'll need to do a tour of West Dulwich and Norwood.