Surely every generation deplores the changes that they have seen and the negative impact of the new incomers and different generation of "the other"? Whether "the other" are different by dint of class, ethnicity, religion or region. Read Peter Akroyd's "Biography of London" to get a sense of the cyclical nature of these things. It would be interesting to know from those of us who are born and bred locals, when their families came to ED/ London? I suspect that there are few that can claim that their ED ancestry goes back into antiquity. My family are from the Staffs/ Black Country borders. They came from the same village, Cheslyn Hay, for many generations. My cousin went back through the records as far as he could. He gave up in the end. The only interesting things that happened were wars (they were all miners so didn't get called up) or pit disasters (my great, great Grandfather volunteered for the Army in WW1, survived 4 years in the trenches only to have tons of coal collapse on him in 1920) or the 'hoss maiming's which saw Arthur Conan Doyle come to the village to exonerate George Edalji. Otherwise, nothing. It was like The Shire, unchanging, unmoving. Unsurprising as Tolkein was raised in the west midlands. Do the local ED originals have similar deep, local generational roots?