????

Great start from him - my money is (was yesterday) on Kaymer (26s stooopud odds...or at least they looked it yesterday morning), Watney, Rose and Poulter. I'd be delighted if Rory won though...even I can rise above money.

Sorry...are we talking about The Castle?

Nice supportive post Zeban...you're a rock.....or something similar

I am hovering between 2 or 3 out of 10

Just bring a campervan, you'll be welcome anywhere

i'm not convinced the majority of Guardian Readers would be that different....rightouesness is easy enough from the keyboard...

I reckon assuming and labelling people who might not want someone living permanently in a van outside their own house as 'daily mail' types sounds like raising beliefs to the status of truths where in fact they are just opinions that's all.

So many 'daily mail reader' types attempting to impose their draconian values on others.

I'm awaiting the Forum's oh so funny one's but this year they seem far apart like post on here nowadays....apart from Brums helicopter obviously

earth moving in the brum household this morning ::o

Some people here are making that age old mistake of raising their beliefs to the status of truths where in fact they are just opinions. ..oh the irony

Of course, cars are the problem. Stop your shilly shallying spoilt generation nonsense... when my grandma was with my mum and aunty ant they were both under 5 she never had a car just had to go shopping on Shanks Pony dragging them along with the groceries - you and your spoiltness with cars and central heating etc...seriously pull yourselves together...and other such carboard box in the middle of the road nonsense

They are blowing up Iceland and craning in a Waitrose

..."had a rendezvous with Janet, near the Isle of Thanet, her mother tried to ban it, her father helped me plan it"..

...after the 8.30pm Aer Lingus Dublin to LGW...I could go on

er....Monday to Thursday commute. Which is why I tend to be on the 10.48pm to ED after getting the 10.02pm From Gatwick to LB....would you like my diary?

Mamora Man puts it far better than my rant on the thread about the demos....It's worth a C&P By the end of 2009 UK Gov't was funding approximately 25% of its annual spend with debt. The debt was ratcheting upwards and the cost of servicing that debt was adding further to it - borrowing money to repay debt is not only Alice in Wonderland economics it leads to higher interest rates for gov't borrowing and the whole merry go round becomes an unstoppable positive feedback loop that, as S. American and other countries discovered in the 80's, leads inevitably to international loan default. Even with the coalition economic programme National Debt will still increase over the next 4 years, not decrease, but at a slower rate. In the subsequent coalition / Conservative government UK might be able to reduce its national debt and the cost of servicing it. As Labour and any informed commentator knows - total government spending will be higher at the end of this parliament than at the beginning. These are not savage ideological cuts that will take UK back to the dark ages, the coalition's programme represents some minimalist trimming of expenditure to bring government income and expenditure back into a form of balance by 2015. I personally would posit a far greater cut back of state spending - but I detest the willful misrepresentation of today's true position by left leaning commentators. They are perpetuating a con trick on the population that extending gov't debt and spending is a cost (and pain) free exercise and, conveniently, forgetting that the last Labour administration was planning almost identical cost reduction programmes - albeit over a slightly more extended period. Now Labour and its cheerleaders appear bereft of any rational plan, except opportunistic cat calling.

PS always full of drunk people except me

I was on the 10.48pm tonight and normally am - always packed and always a lot getting off at East Dulwich. YES.

For starts...National debt has been bigger YES...er Budget Defeceeit NO these two are very different. Basically if your annual income is say ?10,000 (you can have a mortgage of say ?40K) but then having an annual spending of ?12,500 a year on long term annual commitments say a new gardener and cook (or a million new PS employees say hey Gordon) is not the way to go so you have to cut back your annual spending by that ?2,500 or busto, Read that Johan.

Jonathon, sorry Johann, Hari's the left wing equivalent of Richard Littlejohn with less intellect

30% reductions in Public spending and a nice day out on the Rye gets real, "oh but it's fun" support.....have people a clue? Seriously?

We're all going to have to swallow the medecine...'left wing' middle class liberals are actually loving it

Given that her majesty's opposition can't make a decent case against the Coalitions plans, that most of the "arguments" against their policies seem to be based on some tossy wet dream of the early 1980s...and papers like the Guardian is so emotively opposed to reality that they ignore that their own poll which said the majority supported the cuts and infact a third of the population thought they didn't go far enough...it's not surprsisng bunch of trustarian retards seem to think smashing a Spanish banks windows will bring about the downfall of global capitalism is it.

WATCH THE BILL IF YOU WANT A REAL WET DREAM POLICE THANG