????

I am surprised we haven't had one for THAT lion yet...

Me

What about the honey?

Chelsea Arsenal Man U Man c Down... Leicester Bournemouth watford

'Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.' or sumfink

Yup. Tired old repetitive bashing isn't your style at all is it Louisa.

9/10

Yup. What it says on the Jar is the crucial thing. You should try and read the actual post Foxy the bit that says 'the jars aren't labelled honey" ...or carry on talking out your arse of course

fooking hell it's so tedious now it's beyond that shark jumping thing. Relentless stuck record of unpleasantness, and to think I used to be a fan.

miga Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > re: "Big State"...here's a handful from the > quickest of googles, used as a phrase. > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cam > eron/9171481/Brick-by-brick-were-tearing-down-the- > big-state.html > http://www.reform.uk/reformer/the-return-of-the-bi > g-state-incomes-policy-and-the-trimmings/ > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/9 > 559810/Douglas-Carswell-Bad-news-for-the-big-state > .html > http://www.jubilee-centre.org/all-in-this-together > -the-big-state/ > > Or do you mean that it never annoys you when you > see this frequently used phrase? No. I meant that those who bang on about big Pharma, big business, big etc seem to be anti-big apart from the state which they seem happy to run almost anything, dictate how we live our lives, think they know best how our money is spent etc. big is bad...apart from government where suddenly big transforms into efficient, benevolent, paternalistic, force of good and dictator of what's best for the likes of us

Big as in "Big oil" "Big pharma" "Big business" ...tho never "Big State" interestingly

I'll start "Global Elites" "Elites" "Troika" "Neo-Liberal" "Nobel prize winning economist Paul Krugman" "Austerity lite" ...fell free to add yours

Do they deliver to Saskatchewan?

Lanzini this morning. Very happy with our business to date just need a striker....I'd be happy with Austin.

From memory, it's an important legal process rather than just a bureaucratic naming ceremony and you'll need proof of ID etc so, no, you can't just say 'can you bung me down as Smith' unless that's your legal name.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LondonMix Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > There are people who like ED but are so snobbish > they don't want to > > live near Rye Lane in its current incarnation. > > > > For real?!?!? > > God I want to spit on those people. Just go up to the Southbank and spit over the river....you can't miss.

Er, middle class Guardian Reading tossers by the Lane full. It's also the only Green LA in the country and...... in the bottom 10 for Recycling - you couldn't make up their incompetence but, you know, it's 'on brand' for them types and image is all; substance nothing.

It's been going on for years - I remember Ray Stewart and Steve Potts getting the bird frequently and now they are considered 'Legends'; harry Redknapp used to get tons of grief when he played and even Billy Bonds got booed once - after he had criticised fans behaviour in Castilla, well, called them animals.

So.....The Greens, standing in all (most) constituencies with a clear, widely publicised and very different manifesto to the Tories and Labour...got 1/6 of the vote of UKIP. Delusional, the lot of you. Tories will be in for years unless people get a bit real....but huge swathes of the left doesn't really want power they just want to wail. And the SNP thing in Scotland is much miss understood by those who want to clutch at straws/keep their illusions and underplay the nationalist part and over play the anti-austerity/Socialist part.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If only we had a third party who represent those > of us who support a market economy, but are > liberal minded, and supportive of a welfare state > and social justice... wouldn't that be nice... We do - but they are in the sane bit of the Tories, the Blairite wing of the Labour Party and the non-lefty/hippy bit of the Liberal Democrats

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If people considered Ed "too anti-business", then > god knows what they'll make of this guy. > > It doesn't make any sense to take the party too > far to the left... you might please a relatively > small number of people, but all you're really > doing is leaving the centrists no viable > alternative from the tories. Tony Benn after the 1983 defeat "At least it shows there are 6 million socialists in the country" - the words of another purist far happierr in glorious opposition

Tory lite - until they imploded under internal wrangling and TBs awful decision on Iraq. New Labour had regained Labour's record for economic competence against huge odds; massivley increased investment in Education and health after the Thatcher years; started neccessary reform of the education and health. It's socialist worker/student type idiocy to dismiss New Labour and Blair before Iraq. They did much for the country.

So, really, as this thread shows, there's a bunch of Labour party supporters (Lousa excepted) who just want to be in permanent opposition but pure and comfortable to be 'wailing' at the evil Tories. Bravo.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Also, what Louisa said. Rubbish, both of you..unless you want the purity and freedom of permanent opposition....and sod the consequences on the poor etc Even, EVEN, Polly T sees the hollowness of that position http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/16/tim-farron-lib-dem-leader

...they can't really be serious can they? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11745416/Labour-needs-saving-from-itself-and-Cameron-is-the-man-to-do-it.html