KidKruger

?and Lost & Found section !

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Bit windy on IOW ! National record 🥊💨

🤣🤣🤔💨

Yep just had a delivery from RM. (tbh I was more shocked to get an RM delivery at all, than I was to get a delivery during a storm 😳)

There?s gonna be a lot of debris flying around today, we?re surrounded by tile-clad Victorian roofs so not a good fit with extra strong winds ! I?m meant to be erecting scaffolding today, may have to wait a day or two.

Bit windy on IOW !

So basically closure of Melbourne Rd has led to a retail boom on that street, or made net zero impact. Righto.

Oftwat !

🤣🤣🥊

Underhook Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > sally buying Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Perhaps it would give people a better idea if > you > > could tell what sort of property you live in, > how > > many people, adults and children mlive in it > and > > if you have a garden. > > > > If it?s only you it is pretty useless give the > > above > > > > I think it is yet another nose led rip off by > > companies who only have their shareholders in > > mind. As long as green comes into it people > will > > follow like sheep. > > > The entire point of a water meter is that you pay > for the water you use. Not more, not less. Your > post completely contradicts this. I also don?t > follow how you think shareholders of a water > company benefit from this move to metering I admire the faith in shareheld water companies that charge for water by the meter. Meters are profit control tools. That?s it. They?re not designed to save water or improve the envt. On the IOW in the eighties when meters were first implemented there in England (plus across Scotland as a whole), water demand went down by around a significant %. The following year the cost of water went up by something like the equivalent %.

Eastdulwich84 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks for posting this. > On this night my dog ran over to play with yours, > yours who has previous of attacking other dogs. I > might add that we met before when I confronted you > over letting your dog off the lead to kill a fox > on northcross road last summer on a Saturday > night. Clearly I remember thinking why would > someone have a dog to do such a thing. > Which I thought was disgusting and an evil thing > to do. People who were around May remember this > too. > Now back to the matter at hand my dog ran over to > play, your dog attacked my dog and I ran over to > see you kicking at my dog which you?ve admitted. > Once I?ve come over your dog was still attacking > my dog whilst my dog was facing me so to protect > my dog I kicked your dog. After false accusations > from yourself about my dog, which is really > serious considering my dog had so many injuries > and your dog had no bite marks at all that?s says > a lot. If my dog was attacking your dog being a > staff type why has your dog got no injuries? I > might add also it?s easy to say the big guy with > the staff type. Because unfortunately we live in a > society that demonises such. I do have photos and > videos and if possible will post them. My dog has > bite marks to the both ears, leg and front of his > face. I took photos and the gentleman and ladies > who came over to help my dog will be happy to > speak about what happened. I?ll inform them of > this post. Feel free to give the rspca my number > or could you give me the reference number so I can > speak to them please, they can look at my dog > injuries. I?ll be happy for both our dogs to do > behavioural test with them. Privately or funded. > Thanks Excellent gaslighting attempt. It's really sad to see you attempt to twist this. Setting a dog off to kill foxes on a residential street ? Seriously ? History of attacking other dogs ? One that I have never witnessed with my dog which is never off lead in 4yrs (because of weak recall)? Nope. If your dog has bite marks that could be because it attacked another dog, no ? If my dog had all the bite marks would that make me right and you wrong - what sort of sense is that ?! My dog could not run away being on lead, yours stayed there attacking until you pulled it off. The distribution of bite marks is not the issue here, the behaviour of you and your dog is. Hence my decision to warn people. If a dog comes to play and the other dog barks to keep away (leash reactive example), it does not justify an attack. And come on, my dog was stood doing no harm and you took aim and kicked his head-in, exactly the way someone kicks a football. You wanted revenge, you said so (as described above), and then you did it. Your dog was under your control at that time. I hope you feel you got your revenge, but there was no defensiveness in what you did. There was no heroic rescue effort there, so just don't. And please, don't threaten me one day and call me mate a couple of days later, I assume your threats still stand so I will avoid GG at night because I fear you and your dog. I'm not gonna argue with you too much on here because you've started off with plain lies, so it's an unsteady path to nowhere useful. And as for the stereotyping comment - that's just sick, you've made the connections there all by yourself. I have literally only listed physical descriptions as best I can, to warn people to beware. For good reason ! If any of those physical attributes are inaccurate please advise because I can update the police report. In fact, if you can give me a name and address I can update the police report. Please all note above I make no suppositions or assumptions about the other owner or his dog.

Removed as it's going to be a police matter - Admin

Loutwo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Any invasion could spark a mass exodus of civilian > populations towards the EU borders. It would cause > a migrant crisis of millions. It?s a frightening > situation for everyone. > > Louisa. Which would suit Putin just fine, I imagine !

I do wonder what the predicates are for it going nuclear !

🤣🤣😭

?Teething problems? is all 🙄

Propa Trumpian scenario. Whistle and they come.

🤣

Yeah otherwise questioning Brexit would be stupid too, right ? 🙄 If it sounds unrealistic and the Council is deaf and has its own agenda and other ?data? they?ve provided is suspect and they?re in the habit of gaslighting and misrepresenting and the borough?s population is not their priority, well?

I?d like to know what the numbers would be like in a situation where virtually everybody has been vaccinated. Somehow I think deaths would be a lot lower, which may be more palatable from a ?let?s live with it? viewpoint. Of course, we?ll never see that situation, due to the incomplete take-up of the vaccine.

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- ??.you're an apologist for Trump and the > Capitol siege, so I guess this is small fry to > you, big man...? Get with the facts DR, the siege on the Capitol was ?valid political discourse?, the Republican Party have been very clear about that over the last couple of days. 🙄

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why are you trying to drag poor old Jo Cox into > this DR? Do you think a little emotional twang > helps you? > > Open your eyes you fool and see how this incident > is being used as another stick with which to beat > Boris. People like you are like puppets on a > string, dancing to others? tunes. Can anyone tell me how many times Kier Starmer had been harassed on the street by people chanting ?Jimmy Savile? BEFORE Boris Johnson?s stupid statement a few days ago ? Just to prove that Johnson had nothing to do with last night?s incident, like.

I think there has been a traffic accident at the junction of Barry and Sylvester roads FYI. There are ambulances and police there (or at least there were 10 minutes ago). May be worth avoiding as road seemed closed.

How much for an alcove wardrobe, can someone say ?