Interestingly we discussed this at work. After quite a heated discussion the general consensus was that if he showed remorse he should be allowed back to work - as a footballer. I'm so wary of proclaiming anyone guilty or innocent without a detailed understanding of the case. but the info we have at the moment is that he IS guilty. Where is the line drawn in terms of what profession is acceptable to go back to? Who draws that line? Also, he is still "on licence" and as such serving his sentence. What happens at the end of this period if he is still remorseless....should he be allowed back to work as a footballer, he's served his time, right? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30697264 What do we all do if the case review proves innocence? Have you read the website his supporters have set up? I want to make it clear my only opinion on guilt or innocence is that current facts show him as guilty. In either case he was bloody stupid and ignorant to put himself in that position.