James Barber

Hi P68, The problem is speeding. But you raised the risk of CPZ. I responded to you and then you asked whether the problem was speeding or parking. For clarity the problem reported on Melbourne Grove (south) is speeding by a large group of residents. Neighbouring street report parking as a problem - I used to get complaints from those neighbouring street about speeding but installed speed humps and now I just get complaints from those streets about lack of parking. Hi jaywalked, When areas are created as CPZ they often define exactly where people can park and by so doing, double yellow lines on corners for example, reduce overall parking. Shouldn't be too bureaucratic once in place but depends on how an authority do this to ensure only residents can get permits. And yes CPZ parking permits are used to raise money partly to pay for the initial CPZ set-up but then as a profitable enterprise. Usually space is freed up. The most recent CPZ in Village ward has resulted in much parking spaced freed up. In Southwark on council estates they charge ?25 per permit - presumably the actual cost, but on public highways ?125. Hi Abe_froemna, I agree. I didn't raise it.

Hi cl, The consultation would be a leaflet drop with response and online asking question TBC. Hi jaywalker, I'm sure many also stick to the 20mph as well. With time hopefully more of you. I find it odd that no fuss was made to install speed humps along Chesterfield, Ashbourne, Matham, etc that have had slower speeds and less volume and arguably poorer cost benefit than these proposals. Weirdly Melbourne Grove (south) with more speeding and more traffic volume seems to have hit a raw nerve. Hi rch, I am puzzled by your responses. We're not proposing any humps near your home. That the humps will reduce speeds to some degree is indisputable. That a proportion, 15%, are breaking the speed limit by some margin. I think we'd all agree Melbourne GRove is narrow at points. On this last point what are you suggesting? That people speed to get through them - so don't place speed humps. That speed humps wont have an impact - so no problem if we install them and see. Hi P68, The 'minority' were a majority of those living on that section of Melbourne Grove. Robin has said they were hood winked. The wording of the petition seemed clear. The area is experiencing more parking pressures. I've been getting a greater incidence of residents complaining 'they can't park'. I have done everything I can so far to resist the huge expansion of double yellow lines proposed across the area that will remove significant amounts of parking with no evidence it will reduce crashes. The new East Dulwich Charter school and new health centre - the planning was granted with the expectation of many staff and users parking in local roads - I spoke against these assumptions and sought to get a planning condition that trades people working on these developments be able to park on the development sites while being constructed. Public transport. With the new 1 hour bus ticket allowing people to change buses, London Bridge station re build will eventually finish I hope it wont be so long before it's back to being reasonable again. I don't see political footballs. I'm sure Cllr Smith as well as Cllr Shimell and I myself are completely aligned that TfL should take over the local train services and upgrade them to London Overground standards of operating and investment.

Hi Henry_17, I don't believe Veolia reneged on any core part of the contract. When Labour came to power in 2010 they negotiated with Veolia to change the service. Effectively food waste recycling came earlier but Veolia were let of from the tough recycling levels set in the original contract. Recycling rate in Southwark is now well below where it would have had to be if the original contract was adhered to and not negotiated away. Sadly most people's interest in recycling rates has waned.

Hi ianr, Am I correct in understanding your argument is that close to half of 20mph speed limits are being exceeded so why be bothered locally? Across East Dulwich my lot have organised efforts to address this. We've had speed humps installed on Melbourne Grove (north), Ashbourne, Chesterfield, Matham instantly come to mind.

Definitely a 999 call if a stranger tries entering your property.

Hi jaywalker, 85% of the traffic there travels at 24mph or slower. 15% travels faster. The speed limit is 20mph. When 1 in 6 or 7 vehicles is more than 20% faster than the speed limit I'd call that speeding. Hi Charlie, You suggested closing Melbourne Grove. They heard that from a councillor and thought it good advice. I'm sure you and me both wish this had never arisen. Eitherway I'm sure we'll work to resolve this once and for all.

Hi Abe_froeman, The consultation report will be made public and it will be listened to. But rahrahrah perspective can mean a lack of responses and things do then much more easily go through despite many peoples misgivings. Hi fiddles, That is my understanding. Wide open roads encourage speeding.

Hi rich, That is really unfair. The Melbourne Grove (south) was set- up because they wanted to reduce speeding on their road. Cllr Charlie Smith suggested the best way to achieve that goal might be to close one end. The group didn't come up with that idea. And quite understandably felt they should take advice from a councillor. I think you know this Robin so it doesn't seem very fair to misrepresent them like this. On Saturday after the Dulwich Community Council I walked you home and we visited this junction and you sounded at the time supportive of this change. So I'm puzzled with your post. It is really difficult if you're going to be so inconsistant.

Hi Abe_froeman, I'm unable to guarantee that because Labour Southwark have removed the decision making for such things away from ward councillors and given it to a single Labour councillor called Ian Wingfield. I will give strong representation to him but he will be influenced by council officers. But overall I would hope we end up with the same amount of kerb line space for people to park at despite this risk because instead of being an arc minimising kerb line it would be a 90 degree corner which maximises kerb line. I'm afraid I've not done the maths for the overall impact.

Hi Abe_froeman, Please do respond to the consultation if you haven't had a chance yet.

Hi first mate, The wide splay on northern side allowing faster turning - compare it to the junction with Ashbourne Grove for example. Hi Jaywalker, The junction is twice the width of other junctions. Making it normal sized will reduce crossing distances making it safe for people walking. It will also deter articulated lorries from delivering to M&S. This used to be there route for Iceland. Currently M&S is in breach of it's planning conditions but is likely to return to this route as the junction appears designed for articulated lorries to turn. Hi rch, The highway changes will be consulted upon which would be a great opportunity for contrary views to object. Hi Abe_froeman, You must have been away for a while. I've campaigned to block lots of double yellow lines being installed across East Dulwich. Extra are not part of what I've signed up for.

Hi Burbage, You beat me to it. Part of the Draft Kerbside Strategy is to make it compulsory to have 7.5m of double yellow lines at every junction.

Hi bels123, Sure. It is expected to use this to normalise the junction of Chesterfield grove with Melbourne Grove. Currently it is designed to maximise speeding.

I'd suggest trellis with thorny climbers over broken glass and nails. Looks nicer and even more of a deterrent as it ends up higher obstacle to scale. Charlie mentioned Smartwater. Since 2008 we've buying SelectaDNA property marking kits. Smartwater or Metrace has a much shorter shelf life and costs more than SelectaDNA. Either way if you'd like a kit please email me your details and I'll drop one round.

Hi Lynne, Have escalated this Thames Water leak. Fingers crossed we can get it repaired soon.

Any one interested email and I'll very quickly confirm if they're in the area of benefit for a FREE motorbike anchor with FREE installation worth ?500 each. we all need to work to reduce this type of crime.

Hi georgeeepee, How truly scary. You should get some advice from local Police about how to harden your property to reduce chance if this happening again. Please let me know if you don't and I'll chase.

FYI - Val's Store, 387 Lordship Lane has an alcohol licence review. For reasons please see attached.

I'm sorry to say ward councillors weren't warned. So we were unable to alert anyone. Sorry.

Any East Dulwich ward residents who want a ground anchor in their front garden can have them installed free paid for by the council in our local attempt to prevent crime. Email me for the application form with your address as well so I can confirm you're the area of benefit of the current ward boundaries.

You can always report such concern via me and my name been the frame. uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you are near a 'building site' (i.e. a > development of any size where there are > construction workers coming in and out rather than > DIY projects) then there are strict rules that > apply as regards dust and pollution which is why > some of them have mesh up. However in my > experience many of the houses being redeveloped > around here do not comply. You can inform the > council who will send people round- but be aware > that the council will tell the builders who > complained and you may get harassed.....

The resurfacing is planned to take place 8am to 5pm and over night 9pm to 5am each day and night. Pity the residents there. The works are fund and paid for by TfL as it's a red route. The diversion will be along Melford Road, with all its parking suspended from 6pm to 6am each night, which will be made two -way for these works. Please see attached letter that all residents should have received by now.

Hi shell, Apologies for delay coming back to you - terrible cold. Have reported both. Latter will be much more painful to solve as Sainsbury's responsibility and after a number of years have obtained minimal traction with them - they're ignoring a legal requirement on them to properly maintain St.Francis Park and the council is understandably loath to spend lots on lawyers to make it happen..

In East Dulwich we have a bigger issue of some local businesses not paying staff at all - I've had a number of items of casework where I've helped organise solicitor letters to extract wages from local businesses. Ideally everyone would be in receipt of the LLW. If East Dulwich Picturehouse closed Curzon would snap the lease up. When Cllr Rosie Shimell, former councillor Jonathan Mitchell and I were searching for cinema operators we had four interested parties and the Picturehouse won out with the landlord. So I don't see a risk of this boycott in us losing such a valuable local resource. But I do feel concern about a boycott of one cinema when we don't know how people are paid at the alternative. Would be great to know people employed at PeckhamPlex are paid the LLW before favouring it by boycotting the nearest competitor. NB. I should declare I'm a member of ED Picturehouse membership scheme.

I hope you're one of the 65% of families to be offered your first preference for September 2017 secondary school places. We don't yet have this broken down by post code or ward to see if we're better or worse than this average for Southwark. But this is a 5% improvement on last year which must have something to do with the new Charter East Dulwich school the campaign started on this forum and when the Haberdashers Borough Acsdemy opens this will go up further. If you're not happy please see attached Q&A. Drop in sessions are also available for families - tomorrow 2 March 10-12 & 1-2.30 Cambrifge House, 1 Addington Square, SE5 0HF. OR call 020 7525 5337 or email [email protected] Or contact one of your local councillors.