RosieH

Pickle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Michael Buble. He'd sort of disappeared off the > radar a bit, or so I thought. Now every time I > turn on the TV he's being all smug and smarmy on > every chat show possible. But does it not give you pleasure just to say his name? Bubl? Bubl? Bubl? Bubl?Bubl?Bubl? BOOBERLAY It's very good.

the-e-dealer Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- But really why buy a ?400 slab of > plastic because its prettier than another ?400 > slab of plastic? I think you'll find the answer's in the question. If you'd asked why buy a ?400 slab of plastic because its prettier than a ?300 slab of plastic, you might have a point. As it is, you don't really.

you're doing it wrong

woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > how did you get the C word in ? I have magical powers. People on the left would probably call me a witch. People on the right, a shrew. The likes of Vicanna, a self-pitying loser; the likes of Loz, a professional victim. It never ceases to amaze me how such a motley crew of self-important, narcissistic onanists manages to be so utterly judgmental and dismissive of others (although I suppose the clue's in the title). The one thing that Thatcher's death has taught me is that the milk of human kindness isn't reserved for left or right, and certainly for very few on here.

This thread is its own peculiar little microcosm of cuntishness really, isn't it?

Bit head-fucked today, can you give us another clue?

Won't someone PLEASE tell me which is UncleBen's ED establishment, so that I know where to go and apply my make up?

I wish people would put half as much enthusiasm into opposing the current bunch of cunts as they do into celebrating the death of an old woman who's been out of power for over 20 years. Fiddling while Rome burns.

It's true, you couldn't get on a bus without Thatcher smearing her make up everywhere.

What does it prove? Er, maybe that he's a liar who said he could do it, when blatantly he can't. But, I repeat, it's not a test. He's not going to do it. No one thinks he's going to do it. It's a way for half a million people to call him a lying cunt. Which he is. So I have no problem whatsoever with the petition, and think you're turning into Annette finding things to have a problem with, which aren't really problematic at all.

Well Pibe, there is that. Except it's not always the case. My mum reads the Mail, and when she's told me stories of the nasty gypsies having sex with our swans and eating our children, I've been able to disabuse her of a few things. Only last night I was having dinner with a friend who'd read that benefits caused the death of the Philpotts children and swallowed a good deal of it. After protracted (and heated) discussion, she changed her mind. The readers of the Daily Mail are considerably less rabid than the perpetrators.

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > RosieH Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Why crackpot? No one actually thinks he'd do > it. > > > So you're reason for signing the petition has no > relation or bearing on the content of the petition > whatsoever? > > Petitioning used to mean something. Now it's just > like writing 'Jedi' on the census. I agree that petitions can be knee-jerk and not-thought-through, and sometimes downright silly. But I disagree that signing has no bearing on the content. Do I think IDS SHOULD live on ?53 a week to get an idea of how much he's fucking people over? Yes. Do I think he will? No. Do I think getting half a million signatories to a petition like this will get it talked about in the media, so that the people who blithely swallow the filth that's peddled by the likes of the Mail about benefit claimants might become aware of another side to the story? Yes. It's making a point. Ergo, not pointless.

I've seen the results of electric razors on white porcelain sinks and affirm that not all razors suck the hairs off your face.

they have a suction device to catch the hairs that are cut off yes? I haven't seen one like that no but I've seen others that don't no.

Why crackpot? No one actually thinks he'd do it. It's just a way of calling him out for being a cunt. Without going to prison. That's a good thing.

StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Today, to get me some extra time in bed > (knowworrI'msayin) Pish and tish Strafer - there's no equivalency. Shaving sprays face hair everywhere. Make up disnae. No one but *Bob* said anything about shagging, and I couldn't give a fig if you put your shoes and socks on on the bus. I hate it when you text though. That's really really fucking annoying. You should just sit there, face forward, hands gently folded in your lap, not speak to a companion, and keep your fucking hands still you nutter (your feet you can move for wriggling into socks though). You're mental about this.

Vicanna Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You don't cook rice. You boil it. Not in a risotto, you don't. All boiling rice = cooking it. Not all cooking rice = boiling it. Paella on a bus is fine.

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You have a man Rosie! now this is cause to > celebrate. Well done. Ha, you didn't think anyone would have me, Mick? I'm right adorable, I am. Even when punching people in the face. Caveated for Louisa - just to clarify, the only time I've ever punched someone in the face was when a rugby twat forcibly shoved his hand inside my underwear uninvited. Something UncleBen probably thinks is down to my sloppy morals. I'd rather have my sloppy morals UncleBen, than your sloppy grammar. Your terrible command of the English language is really offensive to me. I'd suggest you probably have a sloppy IQ (*shudders*). But I'd be a bit less judgmental about it than you are. Oh, and you also have terrible, and racist, taste in rice.

david_carnell Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ???? Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Established Middle Class - fookers > > *proper chuckle* I reckon he reads the Guardian n'all.

This is the best mentalist thread I've seen on here in ages. I put on make up on the bus, not because of my sloppy vagina (come on UncleBen, that's what you were really getting at with your loose morals comments, wasn't it?) but because I would rather spend an extra ten minutes in bed in the morning, breathing in the warm scent of my handsome man, thus seeing me off for my working day calm and happy, and altogether less likely to punch you repeatedly in your sexist face.

Elite. Of course I am. But I don't go to the opera or own property, so there's hope for the rest of you yet.

Erm. Well there arrogance and there's attempted murder - I have a bit more of a problem with that than any arrogance. Although I missed that episode of Jeremy Kyle, so who can say?

*Bob* Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > El Pibe Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Sporting metaphors are lazy metaphors > > I have to confess that I did enjoy Boris's line > after Eddie Mair asked him if he'd like to be > prime minister: "If that ball came loose from the > back of the scrum.." Boris is a cunt, but he's a wizard with words.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is the quality of a metaphor defined by what was > implied or what was inferred? Is it degraded as an > artform if the audience is unfamiliar with > context? I would suggest that the quality of a metaphor lies in what it communicates. It should aid comprehension, evoking more than the mere literal would have. I would therefore suggest that this metaphor failed.

Did not David also "stand against" Ed?