richard tudor

You have to remember they will ask for a consultation and ask for votes/survey to be sent via email. They will then take the number of replies and then extrapolate the results to a % I.e. 5 replies. 3 in favour is 60% in favour, 40% against. Result CPZ wanted. We had in in our area. When door to door by residents took place no one wanted it. But the replies Southwark had they used to confirm it was wanted. When the letters and petition was produced they backed down. Even the local Cllr at that time did nothing to help. But Southwark used the email results as the consultation result. The same is happening in the Bellenden Road consultation. Be very careful and remember it is those in the loop that will reply whilst most people do not know and have a living to earn not monitor every Southwark hidden but open consultation.

I stood on the corner of Chadwick Road and Bellenden Road just now for 20 minutes, I doubt 12 vehicles came past. Will it go through? Southwark wants it, Community Meeting or not, YES Waste of money and effort. I doubt they will look at the actual numbers only % As regards Cllrs not a word from any of them a complete wast of space.

Welcome to the world of Southwark decision making. Scheme not needed only pedestrian crossing points need to be improved.

One point to remember with Southwark is they will write to your Mortgage lender for payment should you refuse to accept their costings. You will inform your lender not to pay, they will then either take you to court to get judgement or instruct you to go to the LVA or whatever it is now called for their judgement. A long drawn out process involving cost. They have no costs only you as we fund them through Council Tax. There was a thread on here sometime ago from "errol", an ex Southwark leaseholder officer which showed just how Southwark works, May be worth reading

ED_moots Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > https://consultations.southwark.gov.uk/environment > -leisure/melbourne-grove-south > > Online survey. I am not sure how people are > supposed to input to these surveys if no one is > told. Or maybe that's the point? > > Does anyone know, James Barber perhaps, how we get > more information about this work that aecom are > doing? > > Is the DCC really asking it's main highways > contractor ConwayAecom to impartially acces > whether we need some road works done? I would have thought Cllr Barber would have posted this on the forum if one remembers the row that erupted not so long ago. Like the recent consultation with the Bellenden one way system unless you saw the out of the way signs not to many people knew about it. Again was this deliberate and the online survey only for those in the loop. In many Southwark matters being a little more open would be appreciated.

With the current governments intention of allowing Housing > Association tenants the right to buy the social mix changes completely What changes do they turn into different people? Getting silly now

They are not down and out. They have additional shops very close.

You could always ask Trio if they are interested?

A petition calling for it to charge ?reasonable? rents has gained thousands of signatures, as well as backing from celebrities including Channel 4 newsreader Cathy Newman. She tweeted a picture of the Just Williams toy shop, which is closing after 10 years, saying: ?Much-loved local toy shop shut down after astronomical rent rises. Kids gutted. #greedylandlords.? Why would Cathy Newman appear. Is it the trial by media mob calling on favours? Does she live local. Whole thing leaves a lot to be desired.

KateA69 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Coverage in today's Evening Standard - > http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/protest-marc > h-in-herne-hill-as-businesses-hit-by-70-per-cent-r > ent-hike-a3167921.html > > BBC London news planning to come down tomorrow as > well. Will they be mentioning the other shops they have? And will they mention how long the old rent was in place for and new rents in the area. Tugging at the heartstrings too much.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Bellenden Village"?? That is what it is called. Look at Estate agents blurb

There is a similar thread running on gossip with other info. Perhaps it hold be condensed into one thread, Just a thought

Why have you changed all your comments? This is not what you posted in the first instance.

Pick the phone up then Why bleat on the forum. A real local would have replied in the appropriate manner. P.m.Louise for the proper response

Why? On another thread they have a sister shop on Lordship Lane. Why cannot the Landlord run his business as a profitable concern. If he cannot let the shop he has got it wrong. If it is that important to the "children" people will be more than to pay to compensate for the rent rise. There are more important concerns than this.

bob Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You a Billy Biro Boy > Bob S 100%. Went to the school when it opened in 1958. Bessemer house under peg leg Hocking. And you?

No way my man. Local and stayed here. I have no reason to gloat and be bitter. I stayed when Southwark was pissing on the hood. Can you remember when the west way high way was proposed and the Channel tunnel dig was proposed. I doubt it No mortgage lender would entertain you. Property went down the tank. If you had bought a property you were looking at having a property that was unsalable. Bitter about what? I love the area. Local born and bred.

Still got the hair. You have to agree that those were good times. Cannot believe that the Temple Bar is now a ? shop. Magic times. Fear these times are lost on current residents. They think now is trendy and hip. Dream on Still times move on, good job I bought my 5 bed house in 1974. William Penn must have taught me something.

I think what Rupert was saying the above are only example names he had come to mind and not all the roads in East Dulwich.

What happens if you are not a cyclist, do not want one outside your house will the Cllr back you up or will he follow his usual route of the cyclist comes first. Will one cyclist "I want" overrule all others? You did not buy your house with a metal container outside why should cyclist decide where they go. James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Richard tudor, > Short answer yes. > Could be tricky if house divided into flats and > some flat occupants want one and other don't. But > lets cross that bridge when it occurs. Is that yes cyclist will get what they want or yes the Cllr will back those that dont want it? I suspect I already know the answer knowing past form.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > bob Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I remember the riot's up rye lane in the 80's > > Bob S > > > 1985 ? I know there were riots in 2011.. > > Foxy Cannot remember any such thing in the 80"s. Maybe my memory is going. The only "Riots" if you can call them that, more like street punch ups was when the fair came to Peckham Rye on the last Saturday in the middle 60's there was the punch up between locals and the dumb dumbs, all good clean fun.

What happens if you are not a cyclist, do not want one outside your house will the Cllr back you up or will he follow his usual route of the cyclist comes first. Will one cyclist "I want" overrule all others? You did not buy your house with a metal container outside why should cyclist decide where they go.

I am 69 and this has been going on since I moved to Champion Hill with my parents in the earlier 50's, why has the football suddenly become a problem. It never was. Have people changed that much. They used to let you in free at half time does that still happen?

Is it allowed to fix to the road and pavement on a public highway.

Same on my street Pavement and road blocked. I came home after midnight left again at 6.00 there it was. Cleared sometime during the day. Will only get worse