richard tudor

Why have you changed all your comments? This is not what you posted in the first instance.

Pick the phone up then Why bleat on the forum. A real local would have replied in the appropriate manner. P.m.Louise for the proper response

Why? On another thread they have a sister shop on Lordship Lane. Why cannot the Landlord run his business as a profitable concern. If he cannot let the shop he has got it wrong. If it is that important to the "children" people will be more than to pay to compensate for the rent rise. There are more important concerns than this.

bob Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You a Billy Biro Boy > Bob S 100%. Went to the school when it opened in 1958. Bessemer house under peg leg Hocking. And you?

No way my man. Local and stayed here. I have no reason to gloat and be bitter. I stayed when Southwark was pissing on the hood. Can you remember when the west way high way was proposed and the Channel tunnel dig was proposed. I doubt it No mortgage lender would entertain you. Property went down the tank. If you had bought a property you were looking at having a property that was unsalable. Bitter about what? I love the area. Local born and bred.

Still got the hair. You have to agree that those were good times. Cannot believe that the Temple Bar is now a ? shop. Magic times. Fear these times are lost on current residents. They think now is trendy and hip. Dream on Still times move on, good job I bought my 5 bed house in 1974. William Penn must have taught me something.

I think what Rupert was saying the above are only example names he had come to mind and not all the roads in East Dulwich.

What happens if you are not a cyclist, do not want one outside your house will the Cllr back you up or will he follow his usual route of the cyclist comes first. Will one cyclist "I want" overrule all others? You did not buy your house with a metal container outside why should cyclist decide where they go. James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Richard tudor, > Short answer yes. > Could be tricky if house divided into flats and > some flat occupants want one and other don't. But > lets cross that bridge when it occurs. Is that yes cyclist will get what they want or yes the Cllr will back those that dont want it? I suspect I already know the answer knowing past form.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > bob Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I remember the riot's up rye lane in the 80's > > Bob S > > > 1985 ? I know there were riots in 2011.. > > Foxy Cannot remember any such thing in the 80"s. Maybe my memory is going. The only "Riots" if you can call them that, more like street punch ups was when the fair came to Peckham Rye on the last Saturday in the middle 60's there was the punch up between locals and the dumb dumbs, all good clean fun.

What happens if you are not a cyclist, do not want one outside your house will the Cllr back you up or will he follow his usual route of the cyclist comes first. Will one cyclist "I want" overrule all others? You did not buy your house with a metal container outside why should cyclist decide where they go.

I am 69 and this has been going on since I moved to Champion Hill with my parents in the earlier 50's, why has the football suddenly become a problem. It never was. Have people changed that much. They used to let you in free at half time does that still happen?

Is it allowed to fix to the road and pavement on a public highway.

Same on my street Pavement and road blocked. I came home after midnight left again at 6.00 there it was. Cleared sometime during the day. Will only get worse

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I would think these changes are good for residents > - especially if tweaked to create a net gain in > parking spaces. Good for cyclists and those who > may cycle when they feel safer. And defiantly > better for people walking there. > > One-way system result in speeding as a general > rule. So for those drivers who want to stick to > the legal speed limits I'd hope they like me would > appreciate less pressure from others to speed that > these changes should result in. Spider69 wrote. Is it great for cyclists? as the intention is for two way traffic they still have to use the same road now with less space. Also there will be a greater number of junctions unlike free flowing traffic all round as now. Pedestrians can and always have been able to walk in safety, and there is no problem accessing the existing green spaces. Why can common sense not prevail over political agenda. Ill thought out 20mph on all roads for instance As has been pointed out it is a tried and tested route.Perhaps it is the thought of free money that has clouded Southwark thought pattern in this. Please leave as is No benefit at all. Please leave alone/ As as a local resident I endorse all of what is written above. I use this every day and there is no problem whatsoever. This knowledge is from when it actually went in 1989. How will it better for people walking there? I do wish that you would concentrate on ED matters and not other local matters that you have no representation for. If you wish to comment use a separate forum name that does not imply political imput. If cyclists actually showed a little common sense using this system there is no problem. Out of interest just how many accidents have there been on this system since 1989 to the present. I have watched them use this system on a daily basis and whilst most are sensible there are those that should not be let loose on a pavement let alone a road. It is interesting to note that since "Bellenden Village" appeared it is all change perhaps people should recognise that this is Inner London not the shires and things move at a different pace if something is working why change it. If you actually stood and watched the traffic you would see that there is no problem and the road layout is well designed. Anything above 20mph is a rare happening along Bellenden Road. As Southwark has asked for email consultation the result is a forgone conclusion in my opinion as they will have no idea who the people commenting actually are. Decision by mass media not local requirement. I am sure that there are many other road projects that are more urgently required than this. I hope they do not change for the sake of change. LEAVE AS IS>

After living in the area all my life you are right, I dont know the buildings that well. Having used the station for over 30 years on a daily basis I do admit I might have missed seeing them in their block glory I find them depressing, creating a dark dank environment with mess. I actually thought that these buildings would be removed to create a clean, friendly open space to approach the station. However I do find that they offer a wonder display of light to enhance the artistic balls of hair that tumble in a glorious display of dance in partnership with the other piles of mess. That is why perhaps I have never looked up trying not to step in anything. Still lets live in the past and keep the area as is. If you want to keep the buildings above Khans fine. Perhaps if you looked down instead of up you might have a different perspective around the station. It does appear that the chance to make something of the area will be missed.

As you would say. go take a look

So this means we could still end up with the same mess as now in Station Arcade?

At 69 I cannot remember people getting knifed at school or even outside school. Perhaps I was lucky going to the old William Penn. Even growing up in "Sarf London" knifings were very rare. However that has changed.

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Stuff like this has always gone on. It happened > when I was at school and it happened before I was > at school. When I was at school it was head, feet and fists. No one had to resort to a knife. One on one. How things have changed

Wrong thread

You may think they are elegant I don't.

Does that mean we are stuck with those ugly block buildings facing the station. This refers to the station arcade entrance to the station.

Perhaps the City of London should start converting offices into artist studios as we would not like to see they had not spread their wings into other cultural and creative options and gone bust. 800 individual business down to 50, perhaps it was looked at seen as creative hype. A long term viable plan is what is required not one as now based on a now creative bubble.

Why don't you prove it by showing us the evidence

Why did these developers not take a look at the railway square development? They certainly seem to know what they are doing but would it have produced to many problems from all and not worth the hassle.