spider69

ruffers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This isn't an ordinary school.. It's intake will be M & S fed children

Appreciate your response

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi LD929, > Yes you can still email in supporting or objecting > to the scheme - please email > [email protected] but please copy me > so I don't miss anything when I speak at the > planning committee tomorrow night. > > Front gardens of Chesterfield Grove arn't deep > enough to take cars. Which means residents can't > ameliorate any additional parking stress in this > way. What side of the fence will you be just out of interest.

tfwsoll Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > I still find it galling that Southwark Council > > spent millions moving their office from the > centre > > if the borough out to flash new offices on the > > edge if the city. Makes it much more difficult > > Goethe majority of their constituents to attend > > > such meetings. Such a bad use of taxpayers > money. E so! > >mew bonfire I regularly go to meetings at Southwark's new > officeses - I would describe them as 'modern' rather > than 'flash'. As the building cost Southwarwark residents ? 75 million one would hope so. From my recollection of going go this building as there are no public meeting rooms apart from the vestibule open to all traffic you always had to arrange Times before hand to meet officers and can not just walk in off the street and discuss matters So it does make sense to in inform those close to the site because of the interestso as to allow theme to make necessary plans and not have to rely on the forum for information to meeting times Done and dusted comes to mind.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I still find it galling that Southwark Council > spent millions moving their office from the centre > if the borough out to flash new offices on the > edge if the city. Makes it much more difficult > Goethe majority of their constituents to attend > such meetings. Such a bad use of taxpayers money. Smart idea for them. Knowing in most cases people cannot or will not try to go to Tooley Street/Tower Bridge they can pass what ever new idea they come up with knowing there will be no little opposition not only for this but other plans Why not hold it at the Community Council Meetings locally. Council Staff can rest easy. No difficult questions to answer Old Planning debates at the Peckham Road site were always very well attended.

Ron70 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > first mate Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Janes Barber sits on the planning commmittee, i > do > > hope that he is noting the comments here. A > > comment by him would also ve welcome. > > > I don't think comments on this forum are > representative of the wider (silent) majority of > ED, just a vocal minority! > > Ron70 What are the comments of the wider silent majority? Perhaps Cllrs could tell us

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I appreciate this thread has had a bit of a reboot > and people who've not previously commented wish to > get their two pennies' worth in, but why the need > to turn away from the main issues at hand? M&S > Simply Food will be unlike any other supermarket > for a good few miles around. It is convenience > based, easy access from the main road, and > providing an upmarket chain option for local > people. If we already had one in the village, or > Peckham, Forest Hill etc etc I wouldn't raise the > issue of parking. It's the fact we are surrounded > by affluence and therefore this particular > supermarket will attract people who want that > option. This will probably put a strain on parking > in the surrounding streets. Why has this not been > addressed by this planning application? > > Louisa. Perhaps local Cllrs might like to comment?

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I wouldn't call 6 deliveries a day occasional, > servicing snd safety are real issues with this > applications. Objections that were formerly upheld > on a number of occasions are being upheld no more. > Why the change by Southwark one wonders? Perhaps local Cllrs might like to comment?

Silly question maybe. Can you still get a beer and burger inside?

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I used to use the word gyppo - when I was 15. It > was bandied around innocently without any hint of > stereotyping, but haven't we all moved on a bit > since then? Is this not what they supposed to do. Move on?

And the park that you knew and loved will change to appease the greens. Look to the local drains and sewers. As if

Wasting lots of money

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi spider69, > To be honest I was totally agog when I received > the reply tellingg me this. > But at least a solution is now in sight. We just > need dates. Why did Southwark not act before. What reasons were you given? Please do not mention the contract for all intents it has been rendered null and void Look forward to hearing

The bad news is the builder and their air-handling system hasnt worked properly since installation. It's too damn hot for classes etc. That their contract meant it could only be fixed by them else any other supplier fixing it would be totally at the councils expense and nullify the contract. Finally after 3 1/2 years the council has agreement from the builder to come and fix it. No specific time has yet been agreed but when I know I will share that information here. Wby has it taken so long? After it was installed and the snagging process took place why was it not fixed and continued to be fixed? Did Southwark claim compensation or consider legal action?

jackangel Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Family Sunday lunch. You know what it's like. > Can anyone help settle the argument: what are the > differences between a "yummy mummy" and a "tart"? A very silly tone of voice from YM or MILF as they used to be known

LD929 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > there was a consultation on all of these building > works on east dulwich grove: > > http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200431/street_imp > rovements/3180/east_dulwich_grove How many letters where sent out, what area address,s and what was the result for or against spending this additional money Was this a community Council decision Cllr Barber please provide

What would your response be if it was YOUR house that was under threat?

ClaphamCouple Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Guys - We're a 30s couple from Clapham and soon > going to have a baby. We are planning to move to > Dulwich but are confused about the pros and cons > of East/West dulwich. We both work in the city and > love a vibrant high street. Although this would > change I guess. Can some experts pencil down their > advice? Regards A & N We both work in the city? You should fit in very well

What would the law say if they could not see it?

Perhaps the right response to this should have been My gerbils bigger than that Matter dead and buried

If caught will he have to appear in a line up for the offending appendage to be identied and his waste water crossed referenced with the orange liquid that has been left in ED

Dulwich Medical Center. Crystal Palacce Road Has the service got better. Dropped renewal request into chemist first thing Tuesday morning. To be ready for collection after 5 on Thursday Went in midday Friday, no medicine. Told to come back before 6. Result no medicine. Reception told chemist prescription in front of doctor still to sign. Asked if they could go and ask doctor to sign. Answer we are to busy to do this Come back next week MAKE YOUR OWN MIND UP. HAS THE SERVICE IMPROVED JOKE

Richy86 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Kalamitykel - my age was brought into the equation > earlier in the thread I think to undermine my > right to an opinion. Not to undermine your right to opinion but to bring to your attention that there are others who find that Iceland is an important port of call for provisions. As you get older you actually might find these people exist and live in ED and do not have the expediture to frequent the kind of store you are desperate to transplant in. "Those pesky older folk eh, always in the way of bright young things.... Soylent Green appearing on local menus soon." Unable to accept change, I would have thought they have accepted more change in their lifetimes than you or I and moved forward and will not be broken by a loss of a shop. Plently disappeared in their lifetimes sometimes over night I can afford to shop where ever my fancy takes me but I am aware of others and find it amusing that these shops have to be there to prop up the current overpriced house purchases and I would imagine a source of worry in some quarters to fund them without renting out rooms. When interest rates go up the curtain will be lifted. Hi ho off to the pound shop. No hangups, life is grand

Richy86 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I really dont understand why anyone would want an > iceland instead of an M&S or a Waitrose? Both of > which would be a fantastic addition to LL. > > Iceland massively drags the place down. > > Bring it on I say. When you get a little Older you might understand.

dollywitch Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Was mentioned in another thread but does anyone > know what the legality is of people just parking > their camper vans/transit vans and then living > there? > > When I go through the path around the football > ground car park there seems to be 3 or 4 vans all > parked up having breakfast and getting kids ready > for school this morning! I'm sure there was only 1 > or 2 vans before but they seem to be increasing, > so word must be out that east dulwich is the place > to be! Don't travellers usually turn up just before a Bank Holiday when the Council is just about to shut down. If it's not a legal site move them on before they become entrenched and the Council starts running around in circles. IF you feel strongly they can rock up wherever they please why not help residents who have to put up with this by offering the travellers your garden or drive. Not a good idea, thought not.