ianr

You could try advertising it in the Items Offered section, preferably including the model number.

> Or a movement sensitive explosive. Nitrogen tri-iodide crystals on the keys. Or a computer program which re-broadcasts what's played with a delay of a couple of seconds and/or frequencies shifted by a semitone or so. Neither likely to be fatal but could have marked behavioural effects. What would we be extinguishing, btw? Mozart, Debussy, Joplin, Gershwin, Bilk, ...?

I assume this is two kids trying to do some class-oriented satirical trolling.

> You can pause transactions from your > phone on many accounts these days. With my bank, as I discovered a few months ago, the temporary pause was only possible via their phone app.

Probably best to be ready to phone your bank with your card details immediately this sort of thing happens. Here are two of the previous threads on the topic with some more details. /forum/read.php?5,1972960 /forum/read.php?5,1605875

Pugwash wrote on 16 June: ------------------------------- > I have no problems in wearing > a mask but as a person who lip > reads as I have only partial > hearing, it would be helpful > if other mask wearers take in to > consideration that I may ask them > to repeat anything that is said to > me. I have head the experience of > people talking to me and I have > asked them to repeat for them > to get very aggressive . The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings on Public Transport) (England) Regulations 2020, SI 2020/592, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/592/part/3/made, say: "3.?(1) No person may, without reasonable excuse, use a public transport service without wearing a face covering. ... 4. For the purposes of regulation 3(1), the circumstances in which a person ('P') has a reasonable excuse include those where? ... (b) P is travelling with, or providing assistance to, another person ('B') and B relies on lip reading to communicate with P; ..." Whether it's manageable, practicable, safe, sensible. considerate of others, etc in any situation is another matter of course, but at least you're potentially, after explanation, saved the worry of its being deemed a breach of the regulation.

Reinforced, I hope.

> [looks at keano and his red-pill internet history] I've no idea what this means. Is it a reference to www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill; or (probably more likely) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_pill_and_blue_pill?

Victor8ST Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Speak to a good lawyer about this because if you > have insurance you'll be able to fix everything > and not spend money from your pocket. Re Victor8ST: see /forum/read.php?30,1960889,2119824#msg-2119824, where he's pushing https://houseandgardencare.com/garden/best-petrol-lawn-mower-guide-for-buyers, ie https://houseandgardencare.com/garden/best-petrol-lawn-mower-guide-for-buyers The preceding post here will probably be populated in a few days with another website URL he's currently being paid to make look popular and respectable.

JohnL wrote: ------------- > snowy wrote: > ------------ > ----- >> Ah I?ve not been clear - >> act blue is a fundraising >> portal- a bit like just giving here in the UK. >> It specialises in donations from individuals. > > > Really why write your own fundraising > portal for what you do when off the shelf ones > that can be trusted exist I guess "ActBlue is a nonprofit organization that builds tools Democrats count on to run their own small-dollar fundraising programs." https://secure.actblue.com/donate/supportactblue

> Why go when you know it?s not enforcing regulations? There's no 2 metre distancing regulation in England. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/all?title=Coronavirus&text=%222%20metres%22

rollflick wrote: ----------------- > Melbourne Grove has been repeatedly > designated as a future local cycling > route but the council has failed to > deliver. Trouble is the council has now > also failed to communicate this plan or > explain that it has a legal obligation > to provide for dramatically increased > levels of walking and > cycling. Where do the designation and the legal obligation reside?

For the avoidance of doubt or confusion, DulwichBorn&Bred's post of 10:43 is simply a pasted copy of a Facebook page of Kunaal Hathi. I see he's a provisonally registered doctor, which means, if I've understood my reading correctly, that he graduated this year from medical school, and that graduation was probably brought forward in time because of COVID. Normally the next stage in the arduous training process would be to start in post as a Foundation Year 1 junior doctor in August or September. Instead he's accepted the newly introduced invitations to register provisionally for a pre-Foundation year 1 position, again presumably a COVID measure. And so, rather than taking a well-earned post-qualification break, he's been immersed in all the pressure and pain of a COVID ward. All thanks and plaudits to him for that. There are a number of aspects of his post that I take serious issue with, but I'll leave it at that.

OTOH, we are told :( ... "Treating rose chafers is important, not only for the health of your rose and other susceptible ornamentals, but for wildlife too. The rose chafer contains a toxin within its body chemistry that can be deadly to birds, including chickens. The same toxin can be deadly to other small animals when they eat these beetles." https://www.gardeningknowhow.com/ornamental/flowers/roses/rose-chafers-on-garden-roses.htm

DulwichFox wrote: > Can they Pay and if so How ?? > > You cannot pay cash on the bus. > Pretending you're a visitor to london seems to provide the most explicit information: https://tfl.gov.uk/travel-information/visiting-london/getting-around-london/best-ways-for-visitors-to-pay.

Countrlass22 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Post and leaflets do not pose > risk of catching covid 19. > Its only hard surfaces metal. > By cough sneeze. Or in under > 2metres contact infected person. Where does your certainty come from?

> I saw Italians were claiming > COVID-19 had decreased in virility > and mortality in Italy Please read, for example, this non-technical report before grasping at any conclusions. https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-losing-its-lethality-in-italy-according-to-doctors-2020-6. From which ..."We need to be exceptionally careful not to create a sense that all of sudden the virus, by its own volition, has now decided to be less pathogenic," he said on Monday. "This is still a killer virus." ..... "It may not be that the virus itself is becoming less potent," Ryan said. "It may be that we are ? as community and as a global community ? successfully reducing the number, intensity, and frequency of exposure to the virus, which, on the face of it, the virus then looks weaker."

... and that was the last that was ever heard of Apbin ...

Noticed, en passant, that at 09:50 today there was no queue at all.

Alan Medic wrote: ----------------- > DulwichFox wrote: > ----------------- >> It is just possible or even probable >> that Many of us have been exposed to >> The Virus Have had the Virus and are >> now immune to the Virus. > > I think 6% is the figure I saw for > this yesterday. That's not many. That's probably from the ongoing joint pilot COVID-19 infection study, with a panel size (so far) of about 10,000 households. And from those, a subset of 885 adults who'd provided blood samples up to 24 May: 6.78% positive for antibodies (95% Confidence Interval 5.21-8.64%). https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/28may2020 There's also an ongoing sampling of blood donors for antibodies, about 7,000 a week afaics. The attached is extracted from the latest (28 May, Week 22) national surveillance report available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-covid-19-surveillance-reports.

This got me ruminating on ways, other than physically penning it in, of hindering a getaway car's use. Has anyone ever tried blocking an exhaust by sticking something like a sock into it?

I've reported your problem to Admin. I think it's relevant that the OP himself now wants to remove the detail.

I'm not your research assistant or article writer.

diable rouge> The slogan 'Stay Home' was his. Do you have any sources for this? A quick search brings up a fairly detailed article, "The story behind 'Stay Home, Protect the NHS, Save Lives'", https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/05/01/story-behind-stay-home-protect-nhs-save-lives/, in which there's not even a mention of Cummings.

I suspect there may be no statute law provision concerning overhanging trees. Whether statute or common law, it doesn't really matter here anyway: the OP is about "high hedges" and the blocking of light. About that, you could start at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/high-hedges-complaining-to-the-council/high-hedges-complaining-to-the-council and then, if relevant, see what Southwark's website has to say.