ianr

jimlad48 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I used the ONS website - > https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunit y/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/death sinvolvingcovid19interactivemap/2020-06-12 > > Powerful stuff and makes you realise frankly how > few people have died of COVID in London relative > to many other causes of death. Thanks. I've extracted just the Middle Layer Super Output Areas (MSOA) data for Southwark from Table 5 of the spreadsheet available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsinvolvingcovid19bylocalareaanddeprivation . It in fact covers March to July, though the latter may be provisional. SOAs are a general mapping construct, apparently devised so as to be of approximately equal size. There are 33 in Southwark. The extracts are attached. I've left in the Contents page of the database, which describes lists all the other tables available. In March & April 46% (206/449 ) of the deaths included Covid-19 as a contributory factor.

whiteplumeria69's post on page 1 seems to me an informed and adequate explanation of what has probably happened. /forum/read.php?5,2141666,2141890#msg-2141890

> For decades now we have had rising rates > of sexually transmitted diseases, > very high rates of teenage pregnancy, The attached chart, "Relative changes in age-specific conception rates, England and Wales, 1990 to 2018", is from https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/conceptionandfertilityrates/bulletins/conceptionstatistics/2018. The full conception statistics spreadsheet for 2018 can be downloaded at https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/conceptionandfertilityrates/datasets/conceptionstatisticsenglandandwalesreferencetables.

jimlad48 wrote: ---------------- > Lets also look at the deaths. From what > I can make out, since May, 3 people have > died in the Dulwich area of COVID. What's your data source? I've been wanting data at a higher level of granularity -- eg postcode area (SE21, SE22) etc) or better still postcode sector (SE22 8, SE22 9, etc) -- than what's been generally obtainable on the web

Ancient Punch cartoon, probablySchoolgirl 1: Hey Trace, what we got this afternoon? Schoolgirl 2: RSE. I think it's double troilism. Schoolgirl 1: Oh soddit, not again. I'm bunking off. There's Brief Encounter at the Essoldo.

cakey Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > hello ED community > > Something for us all to consider if we have > foliage from our gardens spreading onto the > streets? 2 minute watch.... > > https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-leeds-53142780 "Blind campaigner asks people to remove overhanging trees" > > https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=4018062128208956&id=1143803202301544 Starts with a link to the same clip, and then has various comments on obstructive / overhanging foliage.

> Perhaps it's my imagination but I was certain > the signage at some point referred to Mexican. There was a Cafe El Paso at #127 for years, which seems to have closed and made a temporary reappearance at #135 https://www.allinlondon.co.uk/restaurants/mexicantex-mex/8992-cafe-el-paso /forum/read.php?30,1878585,1897177

> Are there any circumstances in which anyone would > not make an explicit claim at the time? What I really meant to say was something like "Are there any circumstances in which anyone would be deemed not to have made a claim at the time?" ie Isn't it universal and unconditional?

> By the way it's proper fraud IF you claim it back Are there any circumstances in which anyone would not make an explicit claim at the time? I've no personal knowledge, but have assumed that it would be a reduction applied universally. And I see that https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2020/07/chancellor-announces-50--off-meal-discounts-in-august/, who are usually pretty careful about getting their facts right, say: "Outlets that take part must apply the discount automatically on the entire bill except alcohol and service charges." I don't understand from the OP why the apology apparently wasn't treated as an admission of fault and accompanied by a refund, and it's acknowledged that it's not a full account. If a further conversation isn't helpful, I would write to them simply asserting all relevant facts in detail with evidence if available, and asking for a refund of the discount, or explanation why not, before making any allegation of fraud.

FelixHA wrote: -------------- > ianr Wrote: > ----------- >> It doesn't matter what we do now >> it's being spread by the rats. >> They're trained and controlled by >> the Russians or Chinese, quite >> likely both of them. >> @FelixHA, I've been admiring >> your posting efficiency in >> https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/uc/post/950932 > >> Twenty posts in less than >> ten minutes elapsed >> time, that's going some. Do >> you live north of the >> Dulwich turnpike? > > I think this is the work of > masons or illuminati > and in future we should > expect something more > dangerous > It is my deal what I do > and how much I comment Now you're conversing with us, can you at least let us know how much one can get for inserting paid links, and where such assignments can be picked up.

Yesterday this thread was buried on page 17 of the listings. "OliviaBlakeMER", you registered on this forum today. Where in the world do you live?

> then they look for a scapegoat rather than > taking responsibility for their own actions It doesn't matter what we do now it's being spread by the rats. They're trained and controlled by the Russians or Chinese, quite likely both of them. @FelixHA, I've been admiring your posting efficiency in https://community.tp-link.com/en/home/uc/post/950932. Twenty posts in less than ten minutes elapsed time, that's going some. Do you live north of the Dulwich turnpike?

OliviaBlakeMER wrote today 21/8 at 16:32: --------------------------------------- > In my opinion, the problem is > serious enough and for a start, you > definitely need to contact a > processional plumber who can answer > most of your questions, because this is, > by any means, a problem with the sewage system. Olivia BlakeMER, is this you? https://www.kenyatalk.com/index.php?members/oliviablakemer.76933/#latest-activity What link are you planning on planting there?

> New planning laws came in at > the beginning of the month That's a bold assertion. What have you been reading? https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/planning-for-the-future

There's a link to the legal deed of 16/10/1990 made in connection with the planning application at /forum/read.php?5,1925977. King's College is said then (introductory para.3) to be the freeholder. There is also the covenant concerning management of the park's opening. ed: 1980->1990

Take care. There's a translation site that has, among its sample sentences, Hebrew and Arabic versions of "I had an aunt - choked on a scallop at Herne Bay."

A lot earlier than that. Milk float was the term used. There's a Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milk_float and plenty of photos around, though I can't find one of the pedestrian controlled ones with, iirc, a control and steering arm on the front. Do the current deliveries come in bottles or cartons? In the video clip above it looks to me more like a carton that the fox is removing. I wonder if they could cope with a glass bottle.

The What Can I Recycle? web page https://www.southwark.gov.uk/bins-and-recycling/recycling/what-goes-in-recycling does include mention of some prohibitions, but no mention of shredded paper, or window envelopes -- both at one time definitely forbidden. From that absence I take it that they now simply count as paper and envelopes and so can be included in the blue bin. A Veolia guide to Southend recycling https://www.veolia.co.uk/southend/sites/g/files/dvc1761/files/document/2018/08/Southend%20Service%20Leaflet%20Houses%208pp_WEB_0.pdf (8/2018, 1.7MB) positively allows "Shredded paper (place under other paper & card so it doesn?t blow out of your box)" into their Paper and Card Only box, which provides some assurance that it's possible, at least at some locations.

This thread might be relevant. /forum/read.php?5,2061100,2063954 Or go straight to https://www.southwark.gov.uk/parking/guide-to-parking/dropped-kerbs-and-driveways?chapter=3.

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/libraries/gradual-re-opening-of-library-and-heritage-services This 31 July update now shows Canada Water, Nunhead, Blue Anchor, Camberwell and Brandon as open with reduced service.

> Even more surprising was the amount of > staff with their masks under their chins. I don't know what they are instructed as employees to do, but the regulations (para.3(2)b) specifically don't require them to use one at all.3.?(1) No person may, without reasonable excuse, enter or remain within a relevant place without wearing a face covering. (2) The requirement in paragraph (1) does not apply? (a) to a child who is under the age of 11; (b) to a person responsible for a relevant place or an employee of that person acting in the course of their employment; ..... https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/791/part/2/made

Epannyes wrote at 22:34 on 28 July: > I agree with this guy. It is >possible that this is a moldy smell. Ready and waiting for your supplementary. /forum/file.php?20,file=357977

> Nunhead is open on weekday afternoons > only for click and collect. Can these published opening hours be presumed to be correct? https://www.southwark.gov.uk/libraries/find-a-library?chapter=11 Dulwich, Grove Vale and Peckham are correctly shown as still temporarily closed.

"Library fines are currently not being charged but we will be reinstating them in September. ...Page last updated: 27 July 2020" https://www.southwark.gov.uk/libraries/gradual-re-opening-of-library-and-heritage-services They seem to be using their web pages to keep us informed.

I'm interested to know where you got to hear about this forum.