ianr

I assume "Heddo" is here with the intention of planting backlinks for profit.

.

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You mean the one proposing to ban street > parking on certain roads? That one? There's only one post dated yesterday 2:56PM: /forum/read.php?5,2144433,2148945#msg-2148945.

Ah, I hadn't realised that. In fact I'd assumed that if other councils had the information to hand it would be rather unlikely that Southwark would not have or feel a need to. Perhaps they're just being economically minded, and leaving the public collation bit for anyone who wants to do it.

> I've just received this morning (21 September) > 20 bulbs of Gladiolus Byzantinus which were > posted on 17 August, But aren't Byzantine things always meant to take protracted, complicated and tortuous paths? Sorry. ;( Re the Private Eye benchmark test: My issue due Wed.9 Sept, delivered Sat.19 Sept. ETA Good news: a letter, with four 1st class stamps (one would have done), postmarked Kidbrooke PO SE3 21/9, arrived today. Bad news: clearly and fully addressed to someone in a very differently named road in SE20 ETA2 The current Private Eye arrived today Thurs 24/9, only one day later than usual/best case.

Given that the experiment has been implemented, is there any virtue in allowing some time to see how it works out before reaching any definite conclusions or making any demands?

> one day it really will be the Inland Revenue Doubtful. It hasn't existed for fifteen years.

The plates seem similar in form to the one that appeared in Wanstead two years ago. https://e3.365dm.com/18/11/2048x1152/skynews-saddam-hussein-bench_4493861.jpg?bypass-service-worker&20181220111220 Am I right in thinking the text will have been laser-engraved?

> as those numbers show what the sentiment > towards these closures is. the sentiment?

> Has anyone ever had a viable explanation from > Southwark as to why they consider themselves > different to every other nearby Borough? Why not just ask them for all the data you actually want -- I assume Southwark has it -- with, if you like, something like that question as a supplementary. Just make sure your request is drafted specifically and generally enough to get all the information you want or are likely to want, and isn't likely to cost Southwark more than the FOIA limit, currently ? ?450. https://www.gov.uk/make-a-freedom-of-information-request Then you could publish it here or somewhere else suitable, in a form easily easily findable by anyone searching for the information.

.

That's concerning. Is the system actually telling you no appointments are available? That looks a possibility from what the web page https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/testing-and-tracing/get-a-test-to-check-if-you-have-coronavirus/ says: "If no tests are available online, do not call the helpline to get a test. No extra tests are available through the helpline." Or is the online system jammed, which also seems a possibility: "This service is currently very busy. If you cannot get a test now, or the location or time are not convenient, try again in a few hours"?

> it eventually goes through to > this with clicking other links. How do you get to that?

"Everyone apart from Hancock wanted to set the limit on groups at eight or more," the source said. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/rule-of-six-opposed-ministers-cabinet-a4545036.html (same as above)

EDHC Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Just wanting to inform the East > Dulwich Forum that a beautiful new > Health Centre has opened up. > We are Osteopaths who are specialised > in treating babies and children as > well as adults. We have been working > in East Dulwich for more than 15 > years and have recently opened up > a new Health Centre. > Please Contact us on 07957611021 > Looking forward to hearing from you > EDHC Where is this beautiful new Health Centre of yours that has just opened up? Your telephone number leads to https://www.healthstaffdiscounts.co.uk/biz.aspx?a=4234-east-dulwich-osteopath and thence 277 Crystal Palace Road.

JamesBeat wrote on 10 September 2020 at 12:39PM ------------------------------------------------ > Another one for the list would be: > > https://www.poplarnurseries.co.uk You've just registered on this forum, looked for and found this thread, that asks for suggestions for a destination for a drive in November 2016, and posted the URL of a nursery near Colchester more than sixty miles away. Why?

I'm reposting the following post of mine, which got deleted. Sue (post also deleted) followed it up, confirming that her issue of the 26 August Eye was also twelve days late, which was in a sense good to know, and asked what was the outcome of Helen Hayes' visit to the delivery office, to which Spartacus replied with the above link to HH's twitter page. ------------- Posted by ianr September 09, 03:05PM My benchmark post, Private Eye, gives some indication of the up-and-down nature of the service. The issue due on 12 August was ten days late, and the next one (due 26 August) twelve days. That was after I'd been ringing some virtual bells to celebrate the timeliness of the preceding two, after a previous period of delays. Today's, of course, hasn't arrived. What I don't understand is why, along with the 12-day late one, posted first class, arrived a 2nd class letter from SE14 franked only three days earlier. Systematic, or simply disordered?

My benchmark post, Private Eye, gives some indication of the up-and-down nature of the service. The issue due on 12 August was ten days late, and the next one (due 26 August) twelve days. That was after I'd been ringing some virtual bells to celebrate the timeliness of the preceding two, after a previous period of delays. Today's, of course, hasn't arrived. What I don't understand is why, along with the 12-day late one, posted first class, arrived a 2nd class letter from SE14 franked only three days earlier. Systematic, or simply disordered?

> We thought it's been quiet on the reporting. > We'll keep on trying to work out what the > email probelm is. If it helps, I eventually posted about three of them. They're still mid-page-1 of the Family Room.

I can. Thanks. While I'm here, does the mail problem extend to the message reporting system? I've made several reports recently that have been well evidenced but not acted on.

The following is copied from parallel thread /forum/read.php?12,2144464,2144604#msg-2144604 and slightly augmented. I emailed Admin about this yesterday evening but haven't heard anything yet. A couple of tweaks of my Firefox config hasn't made any difference. I'm getting probably the same problem, since Saturday. "Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. Error code: SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT * The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem." This was using Firefox and IE9 on a Windows system; and Firefox and Lynx on a Centos 6.5 system. But this plucky little Raspberry Pi 3 running Raspbian and Chrome is getting through. All via home Plusnet. The forum server is, as expected, reachable from all these machines via ping or traceroute. Am browsing around for suggested local remedies, but first couple found haven't been of help.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200905104533if_/https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215 , ie https:///web.archive.org/web/20200905104533if_/https:///wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2018/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215 is an archive of a web page dated 5 September 2020. Anyone taking it as good evidence of a fact situated in 2018 is being rather foolish. Have a look at the live version of the target page, but with 2018 changed to 2017, ie using wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2017/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215 and you'll find the header note:"Medical Test kits (300215) exports by country in 2017 Additional Product information: Diagnostic reagents based on immunological reactions Category: Medical Test kits/ Instruments, apparatus used in Diagnostic Testing The data here track previously existing medical devices that are now classified by the World Customs Organization as critical to tackling COVID-19"

I'm getting probably the same problem, since Saturday. "Peer reports incompatible or unsupported protocol version. Error code: SSL_ERROR_PROTOCOL_VERSION_ALERT * The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of the received data could not be verified. * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem." This was using Firefox on a Windows system; and Firefox and Lynx on a Centos 6.5 system. But this plucky little Raspberry Pi 3 running Raspbian and Chrome is getting through. All via home Plusnet. The forum server is, as expected, reachable from all these machines via ping or traceroute. Am browsing around for suggested local remedies, but first couple found haven't been of help.

This is the third time this spammer has made this post. Its object is to include a link to www.avatarfleet.com with the aim of raising that website's google page rank for use in ordering responses to google searches. Avatar Fleet of Ohio do "Recruiting, Compliance and Training Software for Transportation Companies". Their phone number is (888) 758-4842. Some reports of TrueEarl can be found at https://www.stopforumspam.com/search?q=TrueEarl. Or try https://www.google.com/search?q=TrueEarl+forum. TrueEarl is trying to increase the google page ranking of https://www.avatarfleet.com https://www.avatarfleet.com https://www.avatarfleet.com https://www.avatarfleet.com https://www.avatarfleet.com https://www.avatarfleet.com