Moovart

From the costumes to the decorations it's a horrorfest of non biodegradable orange, white and black plastic and polyester 😱

If Bumpkin doesn't want lessons in an automatic car they're not going to want lessons in an electric vehicle as you can only get a limited license 🤔

I heard this one is coming to somewhere in Dulwich soon. It could save a lot of unnecessary typing time on EDF 🤔

Just to clarify, the trees are far from mature. They're only about 20 years old and will continue increasing in size for decades to come. Trunks of mature Plane trees can reach around a metre in diameter and so any attempt to address the pavement problem needs to address the future growth of the very closely planted Plane trees which will continue to lift and sink sections of pavement.

The beautiful new natural stone pavement in the Dulwich village square, with a lovely flat, but gently sloping, surface to allow the rain to run off and the absence of potentially massive new trees that would, inevitably, distort the pavements and cause subsidence, is something those of us using the pavements of Lordship Lane can only dream of.......😢

This Guardian online article popped up on my news feed and it made me think of the EDF! https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/07/why-i-quit-argument-granddaughter-family

Incidences.

Shurly you mean Incidents ed??? Incidences doesn't make sense Probably not a statistician 🤔

Crikey! It's alarming how much the Plane trees have grown in 16 years 😱 I hope RCH and Southwark councillors look at this and start putting aside some funds for all the future insurance claims for subsidence that seem inevitable.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy9er4dyqywo This article from Bristol is relevant

Widening the pavement might provide a route around a large tree but it won't prevent the impending subsidence and root damage to buildings and pavements from massive tree growing within 1.3m of Victorian foundations and water pipes. The romantic notion that there is an original tree outside Meghan's is not supported by the photo of bomb damage on the front of Farmers. There are no trees on that photo. Young Plane trees are still being planted in Lordship Lane. I reiterate to RCH that if your neighbour did this so close to your house you would be worried about future damage to your house. Strangely Southwark doesn't seem to worry at all about this.

So mainly existing before the buildings were built. Attempting to recreate an historical Plane avenue with existing Victorian/Edwardian buildings with shallow foundations was imo a poorly thought out plan. Outside shops such as Joe and the Juice, there is so little pavement space that, when the recently planted Plane tree reaches full size with a trunk diameter of up to 1m, it will barely be possible to walk past it let alone get a buggy or wheelchair past!

When were the original Plane trees in existence and what happened to them?

If my neighbour planted a new London Plane 3m from my Victorian house I would be very worried about future damage to my house. This is effectively what happened when these trees were planted around 20 years ago. It seems there was no concern for neighbouring buildings and future risk of damage by planting new trees. Other lesd massive trees could have been chosen. The pruning done recently was fairly minimalist, not like a French pollarded city Plane tree, and by the time Southwark does another round of pruning all that growth will be back and even more. I appreciate the intention at the time but I really don't think it was thought through properly. The problems, like the trees are only going to get bigger.

You overlooked the fact that every building has a water pipe, many original from circa 1900s, from the street main into the buildings. With the trees so close together, it is inevitable that roots will find their way towards and around these supply pipes and that soil movement risks damaging these pipes. I believe Thames Water covers the cost of such repairs so I guess Southwark isn't worried about that.

At the same time needing to address the rapidly growing Plane trees, many of which were planted only 20 years ago. These are already huge and have caused breaks in the water main and sinking and lifting of the pavement and are going to get a lot bigger in the next twenty plus years. I foresee ongoing and bigger problems in store.

Where the parking bay has been intentionally positioned between the lines and the pavement, it is a parking bay. That's how it was built when the crossing was put in and the pavement built out some years ago. There are parking bays where the lines are painted into the bays and, in that case, the bays can't be used at all. There is a bay like that in Dulwich Village. But the one on lordship lane is not one of those. It could be one of those if that's what Southwark wants but they would need to repaint the lines or turn the bay into a pavement. This ticketing in legitimate parking spaces has only started recently in ED since the recent employment of a large number of attendants on Lordship Lane. I imagine it is generating a lot of extra work in dealing with challenges given the number of people suddenly being ticketed. There is a cost to that. I'm interested to know is that cost covered by the ticketing company or Southwark.

Has anyone received a PCN despite being parked in a legitimate parking space along and adjacent to Lordship Lane shopping area? The most recent for me has been in the parking bay opposite Bells Bathrooms at the junction with Whateley Road. Just trying to gauge how much work is being generated for Southwark in having to deal with challenges to incorrectly issued PCNs by overzealous parking wardens.

I think the dish in the photo was £12

Just had this delicious Jamaican street food which has popped up on the forecourt of the now closed Dulwich Beer Dispensary, corner of Melford Road and Lordship Lane. Jerk chicken, Curry Goat, Rice and Peas etc. Robert, the chef, is there on Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays from 2-10pm. Nice to see this forecourt being used for something new to this part of Lordship Lane.

Repetition! Concisely answered April 29 😁

Oh yes I see what you mean. I misunderstood, incorrectly thinking you were saying Physician Associates were similar to hospital registrars which, we agree, they are not as PAs are not doctors. 👍

Not comparable to a registrar in a hospital who will have done 5 or 6 years at medical school, a year of foundation training, two years of core training at least and then 1 to 6 years as a specialist registrar before ready to be a Consultant. GP trainees will spend a year of foundation training after 5 or 6 years at medical school, possibly some years as a core trainee and sometimes Specialist Registrar and then a minimum of 3 years on a GP training scheme before becoming a GP and many will take a number of postgraduate exams including the MRCGP (Membership of the Royal College of GPs) Physician Associates are not equivalent to a hospital registrar or a GP registrar and should be working under supervision of a fully qualified GP or Consultant. While a Physician Associate may be very good, they should not be being confused with a doctor and patients should know clearly if they are seeing a doctor or a Physician Associate. The title can mislead.

Your understanding is not correct. The camera is situated on Townley Road so that you cannot turn left from Calton Ave onto Townley Road at certain times of the morning and afternoon. You can go up down Court Lane and Woodwarde etc with no problem.