Mick Mac

matthew123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > LOL > > I've criticised plenty of other Clubs, including > my own, so I think I've been pretty fair with my > comments. I chucked in a comment about 'washed up > bums' playing for Liverpool last night which of > course draws no attention - but yet something > milder about the Mancs and it's obviously a > vendetta :)) > > Just because the FA brush it under the carpet does > not mean we should cut the Mancs the same slack > :)) > > I'd actually recognised a Scouser had tried to > kill a Bulgarian in my defence of Michael Shields. > There is something wrong that justice has failed > as I cannot imagine people in this country putting > up with it if it had been vice versa. Matt - I agree, I think your posts are usually fair (although sometimes a bit too serious/long).

I have to say if it wasn't for that fact that Atila's an Arsenal fan like me, we might not be such good mates.

Try Harver and Wheeler, Spencer Kennedy and Pickwick Estates for that money. Not much in ED goes to that price. Unless you include the SE22 houses on the village side of Dulwich Library, which are ED in postcode only.

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Mick Mac Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Who are ya? Who are ya? Who are ya? > > This is exactly what is wrong with football these > days. This was aimed at the poster - nothing to do with football Anna. I suspect this is an alias for someone we all know.

Sorry, I'm not settling for a penny less that the big 1M. I'm sure my little house is worth it.

Join the queue Jeremy.

Well, people can always change their mind Bob.

Are you THE administrator, The Admin. We prefer just Admin.

Muley Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Musical ones, specifically. I recently > reacquainted myself with Springsteens 'Born To > Run' album, on the basis that he must have just > lost his way and there was some spark of genius, > or something, there once. > > No. Pish, and always has been. > > Van Morrison falls into the same category. > Mediocre songs sung in a mediocre voice. And being > grumpy does not equate with being soulful. > > And that Jim Morrison, he's another one... Apparently this is the gig that got him noticed in the UK:

Who are ya? Who are ya? Who are ya?

Amazes me Anna that the Threshers staff did not check out the card with such a big purchase. Anyway, hope you get the money back. You're sure you didn't spend it when you were drunk? Have you checked the wine cellar?

Just about all the music I like has been on this thread. Tom Waits is brilliant - even better if it just him, you and a glass of whisky. He's fantastic. Martha was the first song I heard of his, Martha by some bearded bloke - but good

Take that Leeds....1974 memories http://www.pma-group.com/new_images/keegan_bremner_1974.jpg

Ok Nigee - for a Million, you have forced my hand and you can have my house. I'm ready to sell it to you tonight. Just wait until I see if I can wake the kids.

I think it would be wrong for Bellamy to be punished/castigated for this - he should not have done what he did, but fans who come onto the pitch don't deserve protection. After all it was only a push/slap. Having said that if you have a bad boy image already then you should avoid trouble.

STS now 11/10 Quids based upon good weather prediction for the next week.

Like the Boss and Van Morrison too. Can't see how anyone would not like Thunder Road on Born to Run. I know I have said it before. Want to buy Astral Weeks to test out early Van Morrison as it is supposedly his best effort. It was before my time.

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry Mick, I didn't realise you wanted a direct > response. There are some post you just can't argue with. Overall, I see your point Keef and to a certain extent you are correct, we should not object to churches just becasue they are churches. There needs to be a demand for them however and I'm not sure how this is measured or whether churches just like to have a presence in most areas.

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Keef Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I'd like a cinema, but I just believe that most > of > > the people against this application are against > it > > more because they don't want a church there, > than > > the fact they'd be regular visitors to the > cinema. > > For that reason, I hope the church wins. > > Keef - I am one of the people who wants it to fail > because its a church. The reason for this is that > churches have money from donations, they build a > church to have a presence in a society whether > there is a real demand for that church or not. > They do not have to have significant attendees to > survive as the wider based church donations pay > for its upkeep. > > The cinema is a business - if there is no demand > it will fail. But it is likely to be of use to > more people in society. > The church will lie empty 95% of the week and > contribute little to society, but take up a prime > space. > > We don't need more churches, demand for them is > falling dramatically. > > Its not a case of people objecting just because > its a church, there is usually some logic, and a > more attractive alternative is being offered. You did not respond to my post Keef - I'll assume that's because you thought it was just "super".

Keef Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'd like a cinema, but I just believe that most of > the people against this application are against it > more because they don't want a church there, than > the fact they'd be regular visitors to the cinema. > For that reason, I hope the church wins. Keef - I am one of the people who wants it to fail because its a church. The reason for this is that churches have money from donations, they build a church to have a presence in a society whether there is a real demand for that church or not. They do not have to have significant attendees to survive as the wider based church donations pay for its upkeep. The cinema is a business - if there is no demand it will fail. But it is likely to be of use to more people in society. The church will lie empty 95% of the week and contribute little to society, but take up a prime space. We don't need more churches, demand for them is falling dramatically. Its not a case of people objecting just because its a church, there is usually some logic, and a more attractive alternative is being offered.

5/4 is short quids but good luck. Will see what happens to rip before looking at arc. Hard to oppose sts even at short odds.

Yes very good.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Keef Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Why don't you all just reply to each other with > > the phrase "your mum", as that is about the > level > > of this little debate. > > > > Oh, and please stop quoting massive posts, just > to > > type a one line response!!!!!!!! > > > > Now if you kids can't get along and play nice, > > just ignore each other, and get on with talking > > about football. > > > Yes Dad... Keef is just practising his fatherly authority on here, for when he gets home.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry to hear that about Van Winkle.:( Eh Tone? Wot you mean?

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think I am going to be on Aqlaam I have been waiting for this race for some time. How could you oppose me quids, why don't you jump on Rip and make some money.