Dogkennelhillbilly

Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- Mick Mack's "for many British people it's hard to face up to the > realities" type comment is unhelpful. I wouldn't > expect a German to apologise / feel guilt or "face > up to" the actions of Hitler, because it was > absolutely nothing to do with them) QED. German secondary education involves years of studying the Third Reich and the general awfulness of German behaviour during that period: the same is absolutely not true of British education. The sheer f'ing terribleness of every British colonial adventure, everywhere, is not a theme.

dc Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's a Fullers pub so limited scope for other > beers. I gather they are stocking beer from the > Canopy Brewery just around the corner though, > which is good. > > had potted shrimps, for > example, that were (hushed tones) as good, if not > better, than the same dish in Sweetings a few > weeks ago. Not cheap (well not at full price) but > not daft either, especially if they keep their > standards up. Isn't Sweetings legendarily terrible, though?

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You know who you are. Go away. > > "The East Dulwich Forum (a Paradiso of unintentional comedy, a Pillow Book of misplaced amour propre, a Sun Tzu?s Art of War of advanced passive-aggressive techniques)"

I can 'ardly take much more of this ducking argument.

ruffers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Michael Palaeologus Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > The reviewer has accurately described the > current > > iteration of the East Dulwich Forum. See > above.. > > Absolutely - especially the "Sun Tzu?s Art of War > of advanced passive-aggressive techniques" bit It takes one to know one, I suppose.

There's a petrified human poo on the West Dulwich platform...

Has anyone examined the scene for forensic evidence? Usually events like this will leave skid marks.

That's the same as already mentioned above.

But when does Court Lane stop being Dulwich Village, then?

Eastlands Crescent...East Dulwich (as article said) or Dulwich Village?

Nightmare, I'm sorry to hear that.

Seabag Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > siousxiesue Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Me too but they're always empty! > > > > They were always quite empty even before they > > banned alcohol. They aren't in a great location > > compared to the other similar restaurants > further > > down Lordship Lane, I think. > > > > I thought their food was quite good but I > haven't > > been there since the alcohol ban and I'm sorry > but > > not surprised if they have closed. > > > > But good for them for sticking to their > > principles. > > > What are the principles they're sticking too? > > Sorry, I'm if being dim here Taking a wild stab in the dark here: the Islamic lack of enthusiasm for intoxicants? I'd be surprised if they were Wee Frees or ascetics but I could of course be wrong.

I blame latte-drinking gentrifiers. Or possibly people that shop at Iceland. I don't know, whichever is more unpopular.

Or, you know, go in and speak to them about it. Or complain to the council.

1) you're being inconsiderate in some way. Raising wipers is a way of letting you know. Are you blocking a driveway or a dropped kerb? Are you parked in front of the house of one of those people who think they own the street in front of their house? Or 2) there's no point to it

The track isn't owned or controlled by the Mayor.

Total NIMBY thread. I especially liked the posts moaning about overpopulation caused by other people living in London.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > There's hardly a dearth of coffee shops in > Pecknarm There is at that end

Went to Mem's. Guy tried to be patronising. Never went back. I doubt they miss me.

derwentgrove Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Top marks > for the virtue signalling much loved of this neck > of the woods Your misuse of the phrase suggests you don't even understand what it means.

That's silly. Triggering Article 50 doesn't mean negotiations can start: it means you start the clock to exit ticking and if you don't agree anything in 24 months, you leave with nothing. This stuff is complicated; the UK has lots of partners in this; it's going to take far longer than 2 years if it's going to be done well.

TFFT. I failed to write to Hayes to tell her how I wanted to vote - so I'm glad she voted in the way I wanted. Zelig Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Shame on Hayes. The vote wasn't about Brexit, > thats all done and dusted. The vote was about > supporting the Labour Party and leader of the > Labour Party and she has not done that. Shame on > Hayes. The interests of Corbyn and the interests of the party are not the same. The quicker he is dumped the better.

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They all think that everyone else > has got one so they need to have one. This is, to > some extent, true. It's 100% true some of the time?

The kids are alright.

"Why would you remove anything from the curriculum dogkennelhillbilly?" Because there's not an infinite amount of time and teaching resources available. If you add one thing, you have to remove another.