NASS disperse the asylum seekers to places like Liverpool, Glasgow and Newcastle because accomodation is much cheaper in those areas, so the asylum seekers do not stay in London for long unless they have settled friends or relatives who are willing to put them up for free. The problem with dispersal is that the asylum seeker has no control over where they are sent, and are often dispersed more than once, so their legal representation is often disrupted which can result in poor representation and them unfairly receiving refusals of their asylum claim, despite being totally genuine. When their claim is then refused, they get no further support from the UK govt and are expected to return to the country they fled from. I do a lot of fresh asylum claims of people in this position but we make sure that their evidence is properly verified and translated and commission various country experts to evaluate their original claim and the refusal etc and we have a lot who get a different decision to the one they had originally received. This is all paid for by the client and not the tax payer, so failed asylum seekers without the financial ability to pay for this kind of service often get sent back to torture and death. Many of the cases i see are ones where the Home Office have made blatant mistakes or failed to follow their own published policy. They often refuse to change their decision until we end up in the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal-wasting our client's money and tax payers money too. The system is massively unfair, and by refusing pretty much everyone in the first instance, decisions which are wrong and often overturned on appeal, the Home Office are wasting millions of your pounds. They need to start evaluating the initial claims more fairly instead of the blanket cut and paste refusal policy they have now.