reggie

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What reggie said but might be wise to add an > 'alledgedly' thanks quids. In fact I can say that thousands (30,0000 have been affected cause they got a settlement out of court giving each $1000. But what I cant say is that it was toxic waste and that people died.

ianr Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Reggie, have you actually read the Stephenson > submission > http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/ > cmselect/cmcumeds/memo/press/ucm14302.htm that's > referred to? Thanks for this Ian. From what I can gather an injunction does prohibit the reporting of Hansard if the reporting is deemed malicious or harmful to a forthcoming court case. Newsnight are still being sued for reporting the whole sordid tale. Which is more malicious?... suing the press over the fair reporting of a massive poisoning scandal or the attempts to report the scandal? Hmmmm

Re Mcanns and Trafigura, lets get this in perspective. One is a couple who lost their child and nearly got done for murder and the other is a company who dumped enough waste to have to pay off an entire government and 30,000 desperate people and is still suing anyone who mentions toxic waste and deaths. And has managed to get even the mention of these acts in Hansard gagged.

No this is new news. Cause after the Guardian gagging story it was considered unlawful to gag parliament. I quote from a very recent blog. "At the time of the disagreement, Bridget Prentice, the justice minister, said Carter-Ruck was wrong to claim super-injunctions applied to the reporting of parliamentary proceedings. However, in a submission to the culture committee published last week, Andrew Stephenson, a senior partner at the firm, said the minister was under a ?misapprehension?. He said that while MPs were guaranteed the right to free speech under the 1688 Bill of Rights within the House of Commons, the reporting of parliament remained subject to court orders. The Speaker?s counsel declined to comment, but is understood to agree with Stephenson?s assessment. So this is new and its baddddd.

Some of you will be aware of the recent attempt by Carter Ruck the libel lawyers to prevent the mention of its clients Ivory Coast toxic exploits in the media and even in Parliament. Well Carter Ruck have managed to convince Parliament that in future super injunctions do have the power to restrict the reporting of injuncted issues. Which means some dodgy geezer can stop you hearing about something he's done even if its important enough to be mentioned in Parliament and all for the price of paying your lawyer. Nice work if you can get it The Suburban Pirate Blog read it here

'just give me some tenderness beneath your honesty'..Paul Simon

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I propose that if we're a little more grown-up > about it, we'll find that everyone is working hard > to find the best-fit solution that takes into > account everyone's needs. I applaud your trusting attitude Huge not. Daddy knows best. I am not sure that your attitude is completely grown up either.

Dont forget that Santas got a CRB Elf and Safety

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What concessions, that they are reviewing > alternatives? They would have been doing this > anyhow. > > They are now burning up resources exploring and > possibly delivering solutions that may be > commercially ludicrous for the benefit of an > action group. > > This is why lobbyists should be banned from > parliament. Do you think it is wrong for people to lobby their MP? Middle Class Mayhem

If Eileen had not protested she would not have got the concessions. And so, she is cool.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Crikey, you guys have no idea whether it's right > or wrong. You just want to protest it. > > I'd like to protest Eileen starting a new thread > every time she has an opnion. If you know more about this issue why dont you enlighten us? And what is your problem with Eileen posting her opinion? Hug u not

the russians tried to 'protect' afghanistan

There is little difference between the Taliban and the War Lords who are in power at the moment,according to Malalai Joya who has lived through both regimes.

Thankyou karter, jah lush,PR and Monica. No royalties needed (at the moment) just the fun of playing this tune at 1400W down Lordship Lane with a flag flapping behind the Morris while Reggie drives and Sly spouts.

Looks like protestin' actually gets things done..well done Eileen

Well according to one of the few democratically elected MPs in Afghanistan...Malalai Joya...YES! Try this blog

Well I think we need clearance from Louisa but apart from that we are good to go. The Suburban Pirate Blog

This is Sly and Reggie's Christmas gift to East Dulwich. Santa's got s CRB Santa's got a CRB

The weather looks good for thursday ....come on down! There's also a stay at home version where you upload the forbidden text. Details here

This is definitely a middle class protest. http://www.thesuburbanpirate.com/sb_banners2.jpg

Here is a quote from the link in the previous post 'The capacity of the immune system to respond to antigens is vast and far greater than most people realize. Experts estimate that humans can generate about 10 billion different antibodies and that, due to exposures to germs and other foreign material, people make between 1 million and 100 million different antibodies during our lifetime. The vaccine schedule produces a total of about 30 antibodies. It is also estimated that if the immune system were exposed to 10,000 vaccines at one time, it would process these vaccines using only about 0.1% of its capacity'. This puts the deliberate vaccination in perspective.

Heidi I do think that it is reasonable to want to space out vaccinations.I am not aware of the benefits or otherwise of having a multiple jab but I am sure someone could tell us! The reason that this debate gets so heated is that many have used their right to choose not to vaccinate which is a public not a private health matter. So 'choice' gets to be an emotive word with this issue. Informed choice if you really want it has to made on strict scientific grounds and this is where debate ends and science takes over. Best of luck with your child's jabs next week.

Heidi It is true that people have been rude which does not help debate but immunisation is a public health matter which can be considered to take precedence over personal health decisions.

this sounds a really good compromise

Antigen I do think the link to whale.to really did not help your case. As others have noticed, the website lists on its opening page the subject..'Auschwitz Hoax' I couldnt believe it when I saw it and guess that you are equally shocked and embarrassed.