'bout now

Mmmm

Posted by: Sandperson Today, 09:34AM Since when has whether a person is a tool or not made them a better or worse footballer. What a ridiculous thing to say. That's not what I said. Neville is a good player but that does not make him less of a pr*ck, does it?

G Neville may have achieved far more in football blah, blah, blah. Doesn't make him any less of a tool though. http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/sport/sport-headlines/tevez-rewarded-with-entire-deer-carcass-201001202396/

Oh whats 1.7 million between friends. If it was ?20,000 I'd say put up and shut up Sol but it's a hell of a lot of money to just say "lets forget it".

In the context of our two Porn barons, I hardly think it matters if it glistens or glisters, either way it will have a German accent and lots of pubic hair. Brings a whole new meaning to I'm Forever blowing...... Can't say I'm too happy about our new owners but I suppose it's better than nothing.

Err, not me Justin.

No comment on the three articles Taper supplied then Justin ?

I "heart" Huguenot

I hide my Observer inside my Razzle, less embarrassing.

We have the right to expect all drugs to have been properly tested and once there risks are highlighted for those drugs to be taken off market until the contentious issues are resolved. We should expect drug companies to be prudent and conservative, not to push drugs upon needy people despite highlighted dangers. I believe that is what the National institute for Clinical Excellence is for.

I agree JL, the problem with David Bentley is...er...David Bentley.

Looks like Beckford might be off to Newcastle for ?3million though. Personally, if we get that much, I'd bite Mike Ashley's hand off. He's worth nowhere near that. He'll be far more use at Newcastle, they've still got Barton, so a trained windscreen fitter/replacer is always handy.

This news has made my day.

Justin, I have read your blog with interest and I have questions on your research 1.You wrote The reporting of relative percentages is a very common trick used by drug companies to exaggerate any slight benefits associated with their products. In reality, 2.8 percent of people in the placebo group suffered cardiovascular events compared with 1.6 percent in the statin group. So the risk for cardiovascular events was reduced by 1.2 percent, and not 44 percent! I am no mathmetician, but as I see it and to use simple figures lets say group A (placebo) is 280 cases and b. is 160 cases. They are two totally different groups and if the reduction in CV events was 1.2 % then the total cases in group b. would be 276.64 would it not. Apologies if I have got this wrong. 2. You also state further in that raised cholesterol can be affected by several other factors (position, stress, smoking etc.) then instantly recommend visiting an holistic or Naturopath practitioner, which is what you are, isn't it. I may be wrong on the statistics but you seem to me to pick holes in established science whilst offering no facts to back up the treatments you offer. Sure your treatments may, after research, prove to be harmless but they won't be without effect on peoples wallets and good nature.

and this

.

If you keep your head while all around are losing theirs, you've probably missed the point.

To Quids, Mockney and myself, a mad multi Billionare.

74 http://imagecache5.art.com/p/LRG/10/1020/E5NW000Z/italian-74-moto-guzzi-motorcycle.jpg

My kids go to school in Three Cocks, FACT.

Chalfont st, Peter Gerrards Cross Chalfont St. Peter East Ham Uxbridge Chiswick White City Berkhamsted Whitchurch (Bucks.) Pengenfford (Brecon Beacons) Brentford Teddington Surbiton Peckham

28

Well Chief tomorrow??

Engerlaand will win the w/c West Ham will beat Man U 6-0 Damn you, Stella.

You apologised. Thank you. Lets leave it at that.