jazzer

Now as an ex patient my impression was that their is a general lack of accountability or responsibility by the staff at FHRGP and heaven forbid you should disagree with them, "not allowed". They want total control with no scrutiny. How that practice survives, I really don't know. That being said, two or three of the staff are excellent.

Are they even there, try working from home. Scandalous

Nope

I've given an honest opinion based on my own personal experience their. The practice I'm with have done more in the last 6 months than FHRGP ever did over while I was with them (for an almighty long time) and in particular over the last 9yrs. That's a fact. And yes I will slate them, I'd slate certain staff members of staff by name but that's libellous.

I have never seen one single cyclist use it, Full stop, end, comprendo.

No its not on odd occasions, its whenever I go along there I see no cyclists and none also in the cycle lane. Pls don't attempt to twist words, its unbecoming to try and do so.

FHRGP is probably one of the worst surgeries in SE London, if not the whole of London with their holier than thou approach to dealing with patients who they class as customers. Try to see a GP, practically if not totally impossible. They will use every excuse under the sun not to see a patient fobbing them of to other members of staff to deal with. How the surgery survives I have no idea. It's funny that they are currently trying to get new patients to sign up with so many having left and found a far better experience elsewhere.

Earl Aelfheah can you answer the question?

So why is the cycle lane even there then? And where are your figures to show how well used (not) the cycle lane is (not)

It is true, I have NEVER, EVER SEEN ANYONE USE IT. FACT. So you're saying the bike lane was implemented as a traffic calming measure, right, sure. There are other methods of reducing speed rather than implementing an unused cycle lane. You seem to switch arguments as and when it suits you, how about sticking to the point. What an utterly dumb thing to say "So what do you actually want? Are you calling for re-elected councillors ‘and their supporters’ to be arrested, or fined? On what grounds exactly? What is the nature of this vengeance you’re after? "

I'm on Sydenham Hill when I need to be, depends what I'm doing. Everything will be achieved by ripping i out, it will widen the road and allow traffic to flow as it did. You may not like that, but it makes total sense. And if so many who responded supported it, why isn't it ever used?

Absolute poppy cock. No one uses the cycle lane on Sydenham Hill, Never have I ever seen, not even one solitary cyclist use it. I think ripping out the that cycle lane would get huge support as would ripping out "Dulwich Sq"

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

"restaurants where someone doesn't take your order" - can you give some examples pls?

That was the best "pound shop", a great selection of products, sadly it and the chain went to the wall as they say.

Never see anyone over 40 on a hire bike or scooter. These methods of transportation seem to be targeted at 16 - late 20's.

????????????

Well put points.

Vladi, sorry to hear this has happened to you. Was the car locked and if so do you know how he was able to unlock it? The suspect looks quite young.

No, I didn't make a any comment, just posted a link. Clearly posting a link without a comment is seen as an opportunity to pile in on the poster, thanks.

"attack on the tax", I posted a link, how was that an attack? I didn't write the article, so how was that an attack on the proposed tax? Are you now saying what can and cannot be posted, when did you become Admin(NOT).

All I've done is post a link and you're straight on the attack, for heavens sake. And as sarky as ever. This isn't solely your forum and you don't rule the roost so stop trying to dictate and bully me.