Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This has come up in several recent threads and speaks very much to the whole equality debate.


I believe we should.


The results for counties (and LEAS) - Essex, Kent, Bucks, etc - that still have selection speak volumes even the results from the Secondary Moderns in selected areas are still better than 25% of comprehensives at GCSE.


In Northern Ireland which is totally selective, 72% get 5As or better at GCSE compared to 62% nationally


Until Comprehensive education, private education was in decline (and it looked terminal.)


The decline in the share of university attendance from the bottom decile of income families started within a generation of Comprehensive Education?this is even further exaggerated when you look at Oxbridge. Basically If you were born in poverty (as in the bottom 10% of income households) in the 50s and 60s you had a better chance of going to university and Oxbridge than now.


Comprehensive education has been a terrible case of lowest common denominator thinking. It has exaggerated class divide, widened the gap between rich and poor and lowered standards. House prices around those comprehensives that achieve good results are significantly higher than those that don?t further separating rich and poor. The whole experiment was a typical exercise in social engineering that I believe has decreased the overall standard of education, widened the social equality gap, been a massive boost to private education and exposed the hypocrisy of middleclass socialism ? left wing politicians wriggling their children out of the state system is a truly laughable and ultimately disgusting spectacle in hypocrisy.


All of these were put forward as criticism of comprehensive education before it was introduced back then and they largely been proven true

Yes and yes... maybe you're right, but plenty of people from a working class background aspire for more for their kids. But the evidence also suggests that comprehensives have actually been a barrier to social mobility, especially for the very poorest, and that grammar schools weren't (as much).


Edited 'cos my grammar is so good

I went to a Grammar School and agree with quids that for many such schools open up real opportunities.


My school wasn't full of children who had been hothoused for the entrance exam or whose parents had deliberately moved to get them into a "good school". Instead we were a pretty mixed bunch - some well heeled, others like myself making an hour and a half journey from Tottenham to Barnet.


Grammar schools play on individual children's academic strengths and hard work - I'm not convinced that's such a terrible thing. And certainly my experience is that they gave children from all social classes the chance to succeed.


I suspect things are different twenty years on - and that the few grammar schools left are perhaps more likely to be filled with those who can afford to get a private tutor for their little darlings. But I think this scramble is more a reflection of the lack of choice available to parents at secondary school level, than a damning indictment of the grammar school system.

It's an interesting debate. I was at a private school and would happily send my kids to one but I do worry about the kids who are bright and keen to learn but end up at poor schools where being top of the class is frowned upon rather than praised. I think Grammar schools should be reinstated but it seems unlikely as not even the Tories are proposing this.


As for equality, it is a totally bogus concept. We are not born equal - some people will always be smarter, faster, more outgoing etc. Those who are will generally end up richer and will be able to spend more on their kids. If that means private school fees, fine; if that means buying a house in the catchment area for a good school, also fine. The socialists in power who avoid sending their kids to the local comp are obviously hypocritical but I am glad to see they put their kids first.


Grammar schools would allow poorer kids a better chance of improving themselves. Yes, there will be other bad schools where life's bus drivers end up but they exist now anyway.

I think education authorities should first address the appalling lack of discipline in todays schools that encourages the misguided derision of pupils who are willing to pay attention and absorb what is being taught. Address the root cause, not move it to another school.

???? said: "... In fact I heard on the radio the other day that support for the return of grammar schools was growing across the board."


Part of this support may be because many parents at private/public schools are struggling to pay the fees in the economic downturn.


I agree that the comprehensive schools introduction in the 60s and 70s was social engineering that went wrong. However, grammar schools were not ideal for everyone, especially those written off in the lower streams, and there was snob value attached to them. In fact it has been argued that the narrow classical curriculum followed by grammar schools has been partly to blame for Britain's uncompetitiveness and lack of skills in the market place.


Perhaps a european model, like Germany, would be better where top class schools that teach engineering, mechanics etc exist alongside those with a more classical bent and both are valued equally.

I think, before addressing secondary education, we need to ensure that consistently high levels of teaching are present in all our primary schools. This would ensure the best possible level playing field for all pupils irrespective of background when the time came to moving on to secondary education. After all, there is not much point in providing top notch schools (whatever they are called) which teach Latin, Greek and Hebrew only to discover that primary school leavers are unable to string a sentence together in English or struggle with basic maths for example.


Certainly our current comprehensive system is failing our pupils and there is an urgent need for reform. However, whilst I do not dispute that grammar schools have their positives (and there is evidence to suggest that they do improve social mobility), I would be wary of returning to the old tri-partite system per se whereby the public's general perception was that grammar schools were the best schools and by implication therefore anyone who attended anything but would be considered as having failed.

Dispatches: Kids don't count - tonight at 8:00pm on Channel 4. This two-part edition sounds relevant to this thread although it "asks why one in five British kids leave primary school without the basic maths skills required by the national curriculum."

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dispatches: Kids don't count - tonight at 8:00pm

> on Channel 4. This two-part edition sounds

> relevant to this thread although it "asks why one

> in five British kids leave primary school without

> the basic maths skills required by the national

> curriculum."


Damn! Just seen this...thanks HAL9000.


*dashes off to front room*

Unsurprisingly I disagree with ????.


I went to a grammar school in Surrey. It has amazing exam results and is one of the top 20 state schools in the country. I enjoyed my time there a great deal. However, I would like to abolish them.


Essentially I believe them to be extraordinarily unfair.


With a two-tier system of education that condemns children to either an excellent grammar school or a "ordinary" (and that covers a multitude of sins) secondary modern (or whatever outdated term one wishes to use) the pressure to gain a place at these elite schools becomes immense.


Currently, and I speak from experience (although it's got even worse in the last ten years), this manifests itself in either the hot-housing of 10 year old children forced to endure night after night of endless test papers and coached to exhaustion by a private tutor (for those who can afford one) and also a rise in house prices for those areas that still possess grammars. I suppose the latter may be eradicated should they become widespread. The former issue remains.


My biggest concern is that a child's life is effectively being decided at 10 or 11 years of age. Should they fail this one entrance exam, second chances do not exist. What happens to those bright children who miss out? Are they condemned to the "social failure" that is the comprehensive? It is a situation that makes me feel distinctly uneasy.


When I was at primary school I remember the heartache suffered by friends and their parents when they failed the entrance exams I was lucky enough to pass. It is a feeling that an 11 year old should not go through.


My solution to the problem described by the OP (on the assumption that his hypothesis on the state of British education is accurate) is one similar to that suggested by Toby Young. I would like to see what Young calls "comprehensive grammars". This is a accepts-all-comers school that then utilises streaming in each subject to both push those at the top of their subject and give a helping hand to those who need it. By not specialising in "classical" education it allows those who excel at creative or non-traditional subjects to also be exposed to the best the education system can offer.


Finally it also allows for proper social integration by not discriminating against those who cannot afford private tutors or expensive houses in catchment areas.


Surely this is a more preferable solution than harking back to system that had it's heyday in the 1950s and 60s.

mockney piers wrote:- I went to a comprehensive and it never did me any harm.



How interesting, do you not feel there may be gaps in your education, or logic?


More to the point about your comprehensive, to take a positive view, did it do you any good?



Grammar schools did well because of their strict codes of conduct and the discipline of the staff and children.


This could be brought to any school with the right quality of staff,


and correct back-up (not necessarily caning though something with bite would help enormously)


so they can remove control of the schools from the pupils.

I went to a girls grammer school for 18 months. I went from being top of the class at my state junior school, to a struggler; although after the first year, all the private school entrants that had basically repeated half a year started to be at a similar level to me. It was fiercely competitive though and I did not really like it. We moved to the Isle of Wight to a new comprehensive mixed school and it was nice to be near the top again. I mixed with lots of people, but I always felt it was hard on the students who were cleverer in some subjects than in others- they would rather stay with their CSE friends than move to an o level class to be with those of us that were doing all o levels. In that way it failed. But I really don't think the grammer school system was that much better.

Surely the main problem is the ethos in schools? my experience of state schools in London is that the teachers are not interested in the confidence and individual abilities, only the statistics /targets.

Some children do well in fiercely competitive environments,but not for me. I know I would like there to be flexibility where you are not :pass/ fail at 11. The whole of your future mapped out for you. It must be better to be mixed overall with some streaming and bigger class sizes for more able students. How does Harris school at Crystal Palace do so well? I do not know, but I suspect it is very strong leadership and management.But that is their academic results- I don't know that the students leave school confident, which I think is as important. We want children to make the most of what they have and to find their talents and be confident. Writing off your academic future at 11 is not good

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As an aside - sorry chair - Take the Maths Test

> from the dispatches website, teachers averaged 45%

> (I manged 11 out of 14 so 60% then >:D)


The Chair's results are not available for publication.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...