Jump to content

Our councillor James B - Not ED specific really - (failed to respond to my emails)


Recommended Posts

I think we may be in danger of thinking of James B as a superhero:


- Yes it is half term, and regardless everyone's entitled to holidays or periods away from the forum (crazy thought i know)

- Sometimes he may have to work on our queries/concerns in the background without necessarily having an answer or solution for us right away.


I don't know, iamhere, whether you received an email saying 'I've heard you and am working on an answer' from James B? Perhaps that'd be something that would comfort, if you didn't. Equally, some people get wound up by these sorts of emails too - so it's damned if you do etc.


IMO JB has offered himself up to help on this forum, something he didn't have to do. And I admire anyone that's willing and prepared to take criticism in such a public arena (same with the East Dulwich Station Master - fair play to him!)


Good luck with this, iamhere, I'm sure you'll get a response and all the very best.

Barber was busy doing his rounds of door to door yesterday... I doubt he had time to pop on here to see your comments iamhere and then find your email elsewhere in which to respond. I assume you have chased him up over the "failure" to respond to your emails? If its such a matter of urgency why have you not considered contacting someone else? Barber is not the only one who makes the world work you know.
When I enquired of Mr Barber he responded briskly -- I turn out not to live on his patch, so he referred me elsewhere -- dear IAMHERE, your experience (although surely disappointing) seems, in the light of others' impressions, to be a bit of an outlier. Please try again and trust to better luck the second go.

I'd be very interested to find out if this OP has the same IP address as the poster of another party political thread which appeared just as this went sour.


Genuine apologies iamhere if i'm wrong, just too much of a coincidence not to point out. And a shame if I'm right as I'd like to have thought better of them.

Councillor Barber also failed to respond to an email I sent this week. He did however turn up on my doorstep with the Southwark council leader yesterday to discuss the point in question while he was passing during his leafletting. I think that is pretty good service.

As somebody who works in a job where I get a lot of emails, some good and some frivolous, where if I were to respond to them all I would be up all night, I completely understand if Mr Barber leaves some unanswered. I actually admire his patience with the people who write to him. If I were constantly bombarded by constituents moaning about "rusty railings on East Dulwich Grove" or "traffic light timings in Dulwich village" I would go insane!


Original poster, why don't you put your emails to Mr Barber on here, to demonstrate that they warrant a reply? I'll bet they were about a mars bar wrapper in Dulwich park, or some other pointless crap like that.

Councillor Barber ? Should not be on this Forum: Regular surgeries are held by all 3 Councillors. All have Southwark e-mail address-mobile phones for contact ? All paid for by us? Or is he here for self promotion? If so ? don?t think its working. .

Trump Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Councillor Barber ? Should not be on this Forum:

> Regular surgeries are held by all 3 Councillors.

> All have Southwark e-mail address-mobile phones

> for contact ? All paid for by us? Or is he here

> for self promotion? If so ? don?t think its

> working. .


I think it's great that he's on here and I don't think I'm the only one.

Are you bonkers? Politicians making themselves accessible should be applauded not derided.



Trump Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Councillor Barber ? Should not be on this Forum:

> Regular surgeries are held by all 3 Councillors.

> All have Southwark e-mail address-mobile phones

> for contact ? All paid for by us? Or is he here

> for self promotion? If so ? don?t think its

> working. .

sophiesofa Wrote:


> I think it's great that he's on here and I don't think I'm the only one.


I agree. In fact you have to give the Lib Dems credit for being the only party doing any serious campaigning at the moment. Not that I *want* Tories knocking on my door, you understand....

I'm thinking of starting a new topic - iamhere ( failed to respond to our questions )


Only joking.


What exactly was the problem that you had??


Please don't take this the wrong way but, I'm not really a fan of internet warriors (esp 1st time posters) who post vague general stuff like this, slating someone with no real back up evidence. ( I actually spent most of last night trawling through another forum full of similar posts, full of accusations with no evidence against good people I know. )

Maybe you should post your grievance here From what I've seen, he seems to be making an effort to reply to people & sort out problems


The good people of this forum are rightly suspicious of these kinds of posts by first time posters- a good example of it is here It leaves us feeling crushed and devalued.


Ps, I'm not affiliated with him or the Lib Dems in any way shape or form. :))

Hi iamhere,

Please accept my apoligies if I've failed to respond to your emails. I send around 60 email a day related to East Dulich issues and receive around 100 emails a day related to my councillor role and I also try and be active on EDF helping people. I also receive around 10 phone calls a day. I am behind responding to phone calls due to Blackberry phone problems.


Please PM me and I'll call you today on whatever number you state at whateer time outside kids bedtime (6-7.30pm).

Hi iamhere,

I hada very short council meeting last night so spent the evening trying to find two email from the same person from the last fortnight that I hadn't replied to and I could'nt. So i extended the search to the last four weeks and still no luck.


I sent you a PM yesterday lunch time apologising but have not heard from you.

I'll send another PM with my personal mobile in the hope I'll hear from you.


I'm really sorry but I'm at a loss.


Did you send your email to [email protected]?

I'd say that given Mr Barber's failure to find two unanswered emails in his in box, and IamHere's dissapearance from the forum, it is highly likely that the original post was an attempt at some kind of smear campaign against Mr Barber.


Look's like it has back fired!


Barber for PM!!!!!!

I think he was out canvassing over the weekend. Someone from LibDems woke me up on Saturday (late) morning and whoever he was he was WAY too cheerful.


Mountain out of a molehill - two weeks - so what. Quite nasty actually to start a thread having a go at the guy.

Hi giggirl,

I was indeed out canvassing at the weekend. Apologies if I was overly cheerful. It's just that canvassing is one of the best bit of being a councillor - excepting when we were out in the snow and ice that felt positvely dangerous. Anyway you meet lots and lots of people, collect lots of case work and find problems. Also, the odd myth gets dispelled.


No doubt one day the mystery of iamhere will be solved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
    • Fernando came and sorted out our very overgrown garden.  He is a very friendly chap, works meticulously and charges very fair prices.   We’ve been using his Services for many years now and will continue to do so.    Here are his contact details if you have any gardening questions: Fernando - 07946 757938       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...