Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For the second time this week we've be doorstepped by a youth selling tea towels and whatnots from a basket. Last Thursday at 9.45pm and just now.


I politely said I'm not interested and, when he ignored this and tried to force his dubious ID in my face, I closed the door only to hear him reel off a tirade of abuse and peer through the frosted glass of our front door for a minute or so.


They're working the roads off Lordship Lane, if you hear a knock at the door just now.

My wife felt sorry for them and gave them ?2 without buying anything. Better they try and make a crust this way than some other ways. If you didn't see the ID how can you say it was dubious as he was obviously unsuccessful in forcing it into your face?

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My wife felt sorry for them and gave them ?2

> without buying anything. Better they try and make

> a crust this way than some other ways. If you

> didn't see the ID how can you say it was dubious

> as he was obviously unsuccessful in forcing it

> into your face?


Sorry, better that young lads knock you up at 9.45pm and hawk overpriced jeyes cloths at you, then hurl abuse when you politely say you're not interested? How would you feel if you were old or on your own? Please don't encourage this behaviour.


It's been covered before on here and the general consensus, surprise, surprise, is that they're dodgy.


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,11069,page=1


Edited to add link

they're called "knockers" all dodgy


They are certainly dodgy - but 'knockers' in my day used to be those people who offered to buy antiques from you 'take this old thing off your hands' - always dreadfully underpriced and sometimes just an excuse to gain entry and steal things.


These boys are normally 'run' by someone in a van parked in a side street - they don't even get to keep the money they 'earn' for selling complete tat - so feeling sorry for them and thinking you are giving them something to be charitable isn't even a deal. It all goes back to their gang master - very often a very nasty piece of work.

Tonight's conversation (about 9:30pm) went roughly as follows:


Him: I'm selling dishcloths, ?3


Me: Sorry, I'm not interested, especially at this time of night. Thank you.


Him: You f*** c***, what you f***ing... (and so on as the door clicks shut)

They've knocked on my door many times and certainly for the first time at least 10 years ago, they're nothing new.


The first time I did buy a couple of items but quickly reached the conclusion that the 'mark ups' were far too high. I've since been somewhat abrupt with them and barely opened my door to the young man who approached the other night. If he swore at me a really couldn't say as I returned back to what I was doing but I do think the aggressive style selling is unpleasant to say the least.

Reg Smeeton Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Him: You f*** c***, what you f***ing... (and so

> on as the door clicks shut)


Ah yes.. I had this identical response the last time this gentleman called to peddle his wares - a few months back.


I can only assume that the plan is to make the exchange sufficiently unpleasant so as to encourage you to buy the next time they call - if only to avoid more of the same.


F****** C****, to be honest.

So is it always a scam or are there some/any legit schemes? Unless the charity being supported is one very well known to her (Christian Aid; Oxfam) I would assume that it's always a scam - and I don't know of any reputable charity that does this door-to-door selling. Unfortunately - having already bought she will be identified as a mark for these rogues, and will need a lot of moral courage, and support, to resist them - the effing and blinding they use is meant to be intimidatory - and it works. They often call in the dark - I would suggest her never opening the door after dark unless she can identify the person calling as legitimate - a known friend or relative - I assume she has some way of viewing caller before she opens the door - and only opening the door on a chain is also a good idea, if she is in any way uncertain.


The important thing is for her to realise that only a tiny amount of what is given goes to the 'needy' caller, the rest goes to a (to all intents and purposes) criminal - since he is running a fraudulent enterprise posing as a charity.

Thanks penguin I'll call her tonight although I doubt she'll heed my words - she's too trusting of people. She lives on a road where it seems everyone is over the age of 65ish so I guess they probably do well from that road. The thought of someone doing that to my granny is making my blood boil!

sophiesofa


It may well be worth pursuing this google link and printing out some of the warnings contained here as 'evidence' for your granny that this is a known and common scam. It may help convice her.


http://www.google.co.uk/webhp?hl=en&lr=#hl=en&source=hp&q=%27door-to-door+duster+salesmen%27&btnG=Google+Search&meta=cr%3DcountryUK%7CcountryGB&aq=f&oq=%27door-to-door+duster+salesmen%27&fp=b4cf6fad4ba38e6b

Purely a scam - you could try a different tact and ask for details of the charity and its registration number so that you can take a look in your own time - plus if you then decide to donate money it will mean they get the benefit of being able to claim tax relief.


Have found lately that they are becoming more persistent in their sales technique (maybe sales are down due to the recession!) and take twice as long to understand the word "no".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...