Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just a thought, you're not up the top of Lordship

> Lane towards Sydenham Hill and Hornimans are you.

> There's a real reception problem there!


What he said: Orange (and T-mobile) reception can be very patchy in the streets around the Horniman. I have no problem getting an Orange signal in our back garden, but often can't out the front of our house (even though it's far less exposed). I don't think it's a problem limited to Orange tho', but a general problem in this bit of ED.

Further to this discussion, I live at the top of Lordship Lane (or is the bottom - I never know) - Anyway the Harvester / Horniman museum end - and I have no reception on my mobile whatevr - and I'm with Vodaphone - does anyone reading this live at that end too - and have found any of the network providers that have a stronger signal?

Thanks!

I had orange from dec to march-Complete nighmare no signal whatsover.Orange kept making excuese

that there masts were down,and just fobbed me off saying the engineer will look into it.Phone was practically useless.

Now with o2 great signal.Never got any refunds from orange-dont touch with a barge pole

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The driver was male he was on a mobile No one was hurt l. Complete dick
    • Surely the question is whether James Mcash is effective in his various roles? I've seen nothing to suggest otherwise as a GG councillor or cabinet member. No idea about the teaching but he's made a career of it, so one would think he's perfectly fine on that front too. What I do object to is him being elected under one banner and hopping under another one, I suspect out of naked self interest. His headline rationale for the move is scarcely credible. He claims "the council was “planning for funding gaps larger than those faced in almost every year of Conservative and Liberal Democrat austerity, this time imposed by a Labour government...Unless something changes, Labour cuts will devastate the local services that as residents of this fantastic borough, we all rely on.” But what he's actually talking about here is the new Fair Funding Review, undertaken by notorious Tories Angela Rayner and Jim McMahon.   https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/the-fair-funding-review-20/the-fair-funding-review-20 The Fair Funding Review is explicitly about the redistribution of resources based on updated needs assessment, which, last time I looked was a key tenet of the left (including the Greens). Mcash also claims Southwark "cannot and does not stand up the the government" but that simply isn't the case as Southwark, Lambeth and London Councils have objected to the FFR because it fails to take into account Londoners' high housing costs. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2025/southwark-and-lambeth-leaders-call-fair-funding  He seems high on bluster and low on actual detail. And the great problem Greens have to overcome, like everyone else, is that the country has no money.       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...