Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I mentioned you because I knew what a fearless warrior you were in stopping this scourge.


Hmm, or was that weekend warrior?


I thought p3 very funny (moral ill health?!?!)

http://www.ep.tc/problems/eighteen/03.html

and p18 particularly naive.

http://www.ep.tc/problems/eighteen/10.html

  • 2 weeks later...

This ones not bad

'Scientifically' measuring East dulwich (from my old address anyway) at 58% good.

My new address atop dog kennel hill in SE5, is 2% better. In your face Lordship Lane ;)


http://www.walkscore.com


Tee hee, and letchworth from whence I escaped...24% Bwah hah hah

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This ones not bad

> 'Scientifically' measuring East dulwich (from my

> old address anyway) at 58% good.

> My new address atop dog kennel hill in SE5, is 2%

> better. In your face Lordship Lane ;)

>

> http://www.walkscore.com

>

> Tee hee, and letchworth from whence I

> escaped...24% Bwah hah hah


Hmm - I live just off LL and just scored 82, so back at ya Mockney!


It does work with postcode by the way...

I think the idea is so you can tell how good a potential house might be, in having everything within spitting distance rather than having to rely on a car.


Hmm, my office in camden gets 93. Clearly they don't realise that stepping over needles and dead bodies should knock off a point or two.

This site is frankly fantastic.

Whack up the sea level from 1 to 14 metres anywhere in the world on a google map interface and sea how it affects the land.


14 metres might give Alan Dale cause for concern with most of Camberwell underwater.


http://flood.firetree.net


and london

http://flood.firetree.net/?ll=51.5064,-0.0886&z=5&m=0

Oh Mockney, how you have cheered me up this mornng!


I increased the water level by 14 metres, and as a result Peckham, Stockwell, New Cross, great swathes of Lewisham and Brixton were submerged! I am off home from work right now to collect my 4x4 and turn on the light bulbs and central heating. I intend to increase my carbon footprint forthwith!


Just think what global warming can do for south east London property values!!!

This guy (Bob Smith) has me in stiches with the 'dress up' sites he has produced... can't admit (for fear of upsetting people) which of his I love the best but have a look at his work and enjoy playing dress up (some fo the sublinks don't always work)


dress up sites www.normalbobsmith.com/portfolio/part9/


Rest of his work www.normalbobsmith.com/


A word of warning, he isn't exactly 'religion' friendly but hasn't restricted his work to one faith alone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...