Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If it's one of those ones with the feathered horses and an enormous floral tribute saying 'The Guv' or something, crawling along a high street holding-up an enormous queue of traffic desperate to overtake, then it might be worth filming.


But probably not for the usual humdrum trip to The Crem to watch the polyester curtains close followed by half an hour hanging about waiting to receive the cremulated ashes in a tinpot shoe-box.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it's one of those ones with the feathered

> horses and an enormous floral tribute saying 'The

> Guv' or something, crawling along a high street

> holding-up an enormous queue of traffic desperate

> to overtake, then it might be worth filming.


My old nan had one of those - most peculiar - would have been worth filming too I reckon on account of all the shady strangers who kept telling me how sorry they were for my loss. Would have solved at least 6 or 7 open cases on Crimewatch I imagine.


However, I concur with the majority - the thought of someone filming my grief (or indeed unbecoming lack of it) is pretty abhorrent.

Well I did think..


It was "quite different" until an African guy I know said it wasn't unusual where he lived & in some parts of Italy it's OK too apparently


So as long as nobody shouts " Cut, we are going to need to shoot that scene from the top again folks " then it's fine by me


Of course the usual etiquette should still be observed like...


"No posed photo's with the stiff" or "Free commemorative T-shirts to go with the box set DVD at ?29.99"



Honestly though, I think it's just as odd filming your child being born, all that blood & guts.....bleeeaaachh



Each to their own though...



"Cumbia ya "





W**F


*puts on rose tinted specs*

Sort of on a related note - if you go to the Twin Towers site in New York then there are loads of blokes hawking footage of the planes crashing into the towers etc, which I found pretty distasteful...but then 'one' is kind of rubbernecking by going there in the first place I guess.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would bother me. People should be allowed to

> grieve as they see fit without a camera in their

> faces. If someone were not able to attend then an

> audio recording of the service would be more

> appropriate.


xxxxxx


Surely it's completely up to the family and friends concerned what they do.


If the camera person had nothing to do with the funeral, then that's a different matter, but if so and they weren't comfortable with it they could presumably have told them to f off.


Just because you wouldn't feel comfortable about it doesn't mean that nobody else would.


Each to their own, exactly woof.


For all we know the dead person might have asked for their funeral to be filmed. Weird, but possible.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A reality show based on which contestant's funeral

> attracts the most public votes will break the

> taboo, no doubt.


__________________________________________________


Yes...


I like this idea can we call it ....



"WANTED.... DEAD NOT ALIVE "

I dont suppose the deceased cared too much. Ive never been bothered about what is going to happen to me once actually dead. Someone quite 'cold' emotionally, told me recently what actually happens to the body whilst being cremated , he'd previously worked in two crematoriums. Its put me right off being cremated .

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Someone .., told me recently what actually

> happens to the body whilst being cremated.. Its put me

> right off being cremated .


What did you previously imagine might happen to a body when subjected to extreme and sustained heat in an enclosed space?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes..that may be the case but membership STARTING at £115 a month is still unafforable for many. Council gyms also have a large range of equipment and I had a  PT at Dulwich leisure centre when I was in Full Time employment who was incredible and even kept in contact during lockdown giving me a program I could do at home and checking in weekly at no charge or personal gain for herself. I dont doubt that Fit For may be a good gym (Its been in situ long enough so must be doing something right) However the cost of membership means it is affordable for the few not the many. If I could afford that kind of fee I would rather get a train to Canary Wharf and go to Virgin active where theres a pool and incredible classes and facilities 
    • This sounds great 👍 
    • We found a red TREK bike yesterday that had clearly been stolen and dumped. Would love to reunite it with its owner. Get in touch if you know whose it is.
    • Hey, I am interested. I had started a club last year however everyone slowly dropped off but I am always up for morning runs and some evening runs too.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...