Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If it's one of those ones with the feathered horses and an enormous floral tribute saying 'The Guv' or something, crawling along a high street holding-up an enormous queue of traffic desperate to overtake, then it might be worth filming.


But probably not for the usual humdrum trip to The Crem to watch the polyester curtains close followed by half an hour hanging about waiting to receive the cremulated ashes in a tinpot shoe-box.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it's one of those ones with the feathered

> horses and an enormous floral tribute saying 'The

> Guv' or something, crawling along a high street

> holding-up an enormous queue of traffic desperate

> to overtake, then it might be worth filming.


My old nan had one of those - most peculiar - would have been worth filming too I reckon on account of all the shady strangers who kept telling me how sorry they were for my loss. Would have solved at least 6 or 7 open cases on Crimewatch I imagine.


However, I concur with the majority - the thought of someone filming my grief (or indeed unbecoming lack of it) is pretty abhorrent.

Well I did think..


It was "quite different" until an African guy I know said it wasn't unusual where he lived & in some parts of Italy it's OK too apparently


So as long as nobody shouts " Cut, we are going to need to shoot that scene from the top again folks " then it's fine by me


Of course the usual etiquette should still be observed like...


"No posed photo's with the stiff" or "Free commemorative T-shirts to go with the box set DVD at ?29.99"



Honestly though, I think it's just as odd filming your child being born, all that blood & guts.....bleeeaaachh



Each to their own though...



"Cumbia ya "





W**F


*puts on rose tinted specs*

Sort of on a related note - if you go to the Twin Towers site in New York then there are loads of blokes hawking footage of the planes crashing into the towers etc, which I found pretty distasteful...but then 'one' is kind of rubbernecking by going there in the first place I guess.

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would bother me. People should be allowed to

> grieve as they see fit without a camera in their

> faces. If someone were not able to attend then an

> audio recording of the service would be more

> appropriate.


xxxxxx


Surely it's completely up to the family and friends concerned what they do.


If the camera person had nothing to do with the funeral, then that's a different matter, but if so and they weren't comfortable with it they could presumably have told them to f off.


Just because you wouldn't feel comfortable about it doesn't mean that nobody else would.


Each to their own, exactly woof.


For all we know the dead person might have asked for their funeral to be filmed. Weird, but possible.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A reality show based on which contestant's funeral

> attracts the most public votes will break the

> taboo, no doubt.


__________________________________________________


Yes...


I like this idea can we call it ....



"WANTED.... DEAD NOT ALIVE "

I dont suppose the deceased cared too much. Ive never been bothered about what is going to happen to me once actually dead. Someone quite 'cold' emotionally, told me recently what actually happens to the body whilst being cremated , he'd previously worked in two crematoriums. Its put me right off being cremated .

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Someone .., told me recently what actually

> happens to the body whilst being cremated.. Its put me

> right off being cremated .


What did you previously imagine might happen to a body when subjected to extreme and sustained heat in an enclosed space?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I pass here almost every day and have never seen the local business struggle to load. There's plenty of space as things are.    Seems to me this is just the meddling council being ****heads yet again. These are their reasons: "BAWDALE ROAD Goose Green add a total of 35m new 'DYLs' on both sides south-east of its junction with Lordship Lane (22m on the side of No. 157 Lordship Lane, 3m o/s No. 2 Bawdale Road, and 10m opposite No.2 Bawdale Road) to protect access for large vehicles coming to collect from and deliver goods to the nearby businesses"   Consultation here: https://consultation.appyway.com/southwark/order/1c3a8926-8f51-47e1-8460-2727fec6d895  
    • The next Dulwich Hill SNT meeting is on Weds.11th June 2025 5pm at Christ Church Batty Road. Open to all Dulwich Hill Ward residents and businesses. It is realised that 5 pm is not suitable for everyone, but even when held at 7 pm. some people complained that it was children's bath/bed times and wanted it earlier/later. When later times were proposed, there were still complaints- not able to get babysitters/did not want to go out/return home in the dark!. Times are always not going to be convenient for some people. These meetings are held quarterly and are very informal. They give everyone a chance to meet the local team and exchange views/concerns relating to crime/anti social behaviour etc.
    • If it is, it’s highly poisonous according to the Wildlife Trusts. https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/wildlife-explorer/wildflowers/black-bryony
    • You can't load on double yellows, you'd be booked
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...