Jump to content

Recommended Posts

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And mine leads me to

> scream "LOON!" when I read things like that.


Yeah Loon is absolutely what I thought too!


I went to a great lecture at the Royal Society on Science and Islam (ages ago). It was thought-provoking to hear about their valuable contributions towards the progression of science in their early civilisations and then the (perceived) decline in today's era.

The cause of earthquakes is well understood now but whether this is taught in a lot of societies.....?


> Sex = Earthquake? Well maybe, if

> you're lucky, but not in the way he thinks.


:))

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway there may be something to that article. I

> once drove into a shopping trolley when distracted

> by a lady, in a short skirt.


Hey Brendan, do you find your short skirt rides up when you are driving (looks down and adjusts hem on own !!)

We all know about fault lines and stuff but it was still God et al that made it kick off. Basically because the girls were naughty.

It's not much different to those Evangelical loons who said Katrina flooded New Orleans because it was a city of sin and needed to be punished.

Sean MacG wrote:-

Besides Steve, say what you like about those religions, some of them are WELL up for chopping off hands for a bit of the old stealing, just like you. Not all bad, eh ??


There was a BBC reporter went to Afganistan and lived with her aunt for a couple of weeks and she moaned at having to cover her head as the baby of the house cried in fear to see her head uncovered. Her cousin about 18 said the rulers (taliban) were not all bad as they succeeded in getting stealing stopped.


They had chopped off a thieves arm and stuck it on a pike for all to see. Thus all stealing ceased from that day, the cousin saw it as a positive thing the BBC girl was appalled.


Muslim fundamentalism is not what I would choose and many others would agree, but I am sure people would vote for a "no theft policy" and if it was achieved by lopping an arm off, it is very efficient in that you would only have to chop one off. It's a very cheap solution too, you would not need nearly so many police, probation officers, lawyers, judges, law-courts, prisons, warders etc.


It is because of all those listed that we will not see it happen here. Sadly we will continue to watch stolen bikes being sold down Brick lane, burglars, bankers, and MP's being themselves and nothing done about it.

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Muslim fundamentalism is not what I would choose

> and many others would agree, but I am sure people

> would vote for a "no theft policy" and if it was

> achieved by lopping an arm off, it is very

> efficient in that you would only have to chop one

> off. It's a very cheap solution too, you would

> not need nearly so many police, probation

> officers, lawyers, judges, law-courts, prisons,

> warders etc.

>

> It is because of all those listed that we will not

> see it happen here. Sadly we will continue to

> watch stolen bikes being sold down Brick lane,

> burglars, bankers, and MP's being themselves and

> nothing done about it.


OK, I'll bite, and I'll skip over the bleedingly obvious fact that we used to have similar deterrants in this country for theft, which astonishingly didn't result in a no-theft society.


In your fundamental world, what would then happen to the thief with one arm? How is he going to earn a living in the future?


I imagine in Afghanistan, he is eligible to no state help or handouts, so becomes a beggar or continues to try to thieve, rather than starve.

Moos wrote:- In your fundamental world.....


I did say I would not choose fundamentalism at the beginning of the post Moos, but there are some things which might be taken and used from other societies which we might benefit. It certainly worked in Afghanistan.



It is cheaper and more efficient to have one semi-disabled man than hundreds of police, warders, judiciary etc.

If the odd serial rapist was castrated I think that would be in order too.

Illegal immigrants when caught would do enough hard labour to earn their own ticket before being shipped out.

Repeat offenders of asbo's would be given a flogging.


You would not have to mete out much punishment because the media coverage would be enough of a deterrant.


It will never happen in my lifetime but as money gets tighter and we can no longer sustain the levels of police etc. then something more radical will take place here.

Ha ha


Women getting uppity...? Punch 'em in the face

Unemployed...? Punch 'em in the face

Disabled...? Punch 'em in the face

Kids not working hard enough...? Punch 'em in the face

Someone looking at you funny...? Punch 'em in the face

Banker...? Punch 'em in the face

In my way...? Punch 'em in the face

Murderer...? Punch 'em in the face

Terrorist...? Punch 'em in the face


Judge...? Me

Jury...? Me

Executioner...? Me

Evidence...? What I say


Someone disagree...? Punch 'em in the face

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And yes, Red Devil, I did hear that there was a

> minor earthquake at the weekend, epicentre

> Lordship Lane, when you caused a lady-stampede

> while popping out for a few cans from Boss Man.


That's nothing Rosie, look out for when I head over to Majestic in WD this weekend, it'll be a veritable tsunami I tell ya...

Huguenot, is that an old Bob Mills quote? (reminded me of

for some reason)


Quids, I'm not sure where you stand o this. You said LB was being "westernised" and "liberal", for saying this was loony stuff, but to be honest, I suspect there are few people anywhere in the world who actually believe that boys having a bunk up, cause earthquakes.

That?s a bit na?ve Keef. It?s an odd kind of naivety that the well informed have when they assume that others are as well informed as those in their society.


Vast portions of the world?s population are today still very unsophisticated and just as likely to believe the mumbo jumbo a religious leader tells them as English peasants were 1000 years ago.

I don't think that it's particularly big step from believing that natural tragedies are an Act of God, to assuming that something must have pissed him off.


I had a Palstinian girlfriend albeit briefly - she simply couldn't not compute that I didn't believe in God. She didn't quibble in religious debate, her God was very 'human', very powerful and highly vengeful.


She was a bit of a wet blanket as it happened.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...