Jump to content

Recommended Posts

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> OMG - no wonder post is going missing in ED Esme

> (you're NOT Billington-Jones!).

> I have been incorrectly addressing it all along,

> sweetie.

>

> Faithfully yours,

>

> Katharina VDP (Mrs)



Yes awfully sorry about that old bean. In fact, not that I am one to brag about such matters, the letters Dic HD follow my (already) rather grand name - but I don't care for such pretentious trumpery.


Toodle pip, Katharina van der Perjil (Mrs).



Esme.

Old bean - not at all, in fact.....


"Dearest Esme", as my Great Uncle, the Duke of Dunstable once said " It is a good rule in life never to apologise. The right sort of people do not want apologies, and the wrong sort take a mean advantage of them."


Toodle pip Es...er, I mean, you know....;-)


Yours,


KVDP (Mrs)

Anyway back to the thread.

If Leb-Dem councilors do not respond to emails and letters and in some cases delete emails all together without reading first. Why should people vote for Leb-Dems to run central government, if they are not going to listen locally why would they listen nationally


Your vote is between you and the ballot box, make your own mind up, this is just an opinion.


KD

I think we should all stop posting on this thread until KD explains what "real east dulwich people" are.


It's a term he used, but he has managed to completely ignore all calls for explanation, so lets stop making him feel important by using this thread, until he decides to actually explain himself, without just being abusive to people.


So, very clearly KD...


What is a "real east dulwich" person?

KD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > So go ahead have your little tent on goose green

> on fair day, and look down your noises at the real

> people of East Dulwich, the real people of East

> Dulwich don?t think much of you.

>

>

I don't believe I've ever looked down my "noise" (sic) at anyone!

Closing statement:


If I have offended anyone during the course of this thread, I unreservedly apologise, especially about the ?real people of East Dulwich? comment. This is no excuse, but I had seen people being bullied on this site, for asking innocent questions. One person posted, asking about tactical voting and one of the first responses to this post was an attack ?libdem brainwashing conspiracy?? the original posting person gave a graceful rebuttal and duly left, not to return.


Thank you,


KD

Closing Statement.


Kevin Donnelly you've posted noxious politically motivated unsubstantiated smears.


You've insulted hardworking local politicians who tried to look after you even though you're not in their ward.


You've insulted everyone on this forum in the pursuit of your vendetta.


You're to stupid to realise that the LDs are now the most influential party in the hung parliament.


Having done this you're wandering off like a mongrel who shat on your own doorstep.


You are in short, an idiot.


Thank you,


HN

Huguenot Wrote: Ranted-------------------------------------------------------

> Closing Statement.

>

> Kevin Donnelly you've posted noxious politically

> motivated unsubstantiated smears.

>

> You've insulted hardworking local politicians who

> tried to look after you even though you're not in

> their ward.

>

> You've insulted everyone on this forum in the

> pursuit of your vendetta.

>

> You're to stupid to realise that the LDs are now

> the most influential party in the hung

> parliament.

>

> Having done this you're wandering off like a

> mongrel who shat on your own doorstep.

>

> You are in short, an idiot.

>

> Thank you,

>

> HN



==================================================


Great way to influence policy, lose five seats. Nice one.


Touch of sour grapes me thinks.

KD Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Santerme Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Please do not let this thread be over....

> >

> > It's almost as good as discussing with my

> friend

> > in Tucson about his state's new statute on

> > immigration

>

>

> Don?t worry there will be a sequel, very soon.


Or two...


So I think they will get the Home Office and Scotland as cabinet posts...so no real need to worry then!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of Smoke Control law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all per se, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...