Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I never see anyone, other than Kate Ford who I seem to see almost daily!!! However, this week I saw Helen Lederer at the top of Crystal Palace Road Sunday afternoon and Lesley Sharp in the Coop Wednesdat afternoon!!


A few weeks ago one of the blokes from Shameless was in the Plough.... Don't watch it so didn't recognise him but my friend did!

njc97 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Honaloochie - they're called "children". There's

> plenty of them around ED....


NJC97 - I'm aware of "children". I know there are quite a few in the manor, I've seen them and frequently smile and wave at them. Pretty much a policy of mine.


Sooo..?

Hoonalochie - apologies for being obtuse. I fear you may have been confused betweent the famous hollywood short man, Dustin Hoffman, and a small child. Although it appears you are not the only person to confuse diminutive film royalty with the young people of ED.

njc97 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hoonalochie - apologies for being obtuse. I fear

> you may have been confused betweent the famous

> hollywood short man, Dustin Hoffman, and a small

> child. Although it appears you are not the only

> person to confuse diminutive film royalty with the

> young people of ED.


Aah all is clear now NJC97, the scales have fallen from my eyes.

A good point of course and with this recent sighting of Tom Cruise, there may be something in your theory.

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did anyone see Naveen Andrews (Sayid in Lost) on

> LL yesterday? I may have imagined it as I only had

> a brief glimpse as he exited the wine merchants

> next to the dvd place.



Doesn't Naveen's old son attend Dulwich College?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • he's not on the general radar - not with the Labour tax scandal and the new Tories wanting to buddy up with Starmer (on their terms). if anything, he's a irrelevant distraction from some real alarms
    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...