Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh dear. A quick totting up looks like Southwark has indeed gone to Labour control. A bit of a disaster, really. Shows that the age-old tactic of buying votes from the middle classes still works.


I had hoped it would stay roughly the same. I'm a big fan of NOC councils. Keeps some of the more loony policies and ideas out. Still, one redeeming point is it seems that James Barber has kept his seat.


The thought on the Beeb is that council results will be particularly open to challenge due to the voting shambles. Anyone know if Southwark polling stations suffered?

looking at the constituency maps it looks like the most desirable places to live in London (Fulham, Hampstead, barnet, beckenham, bromley, Richmond park-can only dream!) are conservative constituencies. Yes nice large houses and apartments but also great state schools, well kept green spaces, leisure facilities etc...I would be interested to know whether the unemployed and socially disadvantaged in these conservative constituencies fare better or worse (or the same) than equivalent people in labour (the socialists) constituencies in terms of equitable access to healthcare, benefits, decent housing, access to good schools. In this area the access isn't equitable and wealthier generally have access to better services.it may be the same in those constituencies but i was just wondering whether it was so.....


although i guess that there are a greater proportion of wealthy people in these conservative constituencies than in islington, dulwich, greenwich, camberwell etc how will we ever know what is possible in dulwich/w norwood if we stick with labour forever!


is it the people that make the area or the council ?


i hope ED stays under lib dem (please don't let labour take over and destroy us)

@bil some of the things you mention are completely outside local authority capacity so perhaps keeping the focus on what can be influenced at local level is a better way to look at things. Create a relationship with your local councillor (whatever colour) and try influence from the grassroots things that are important on a local level.

According to their manifesto the southwark labour group are promising free school meals for all primary school children as well as guaranteeing a school place in a local school.


Seems extraordinary...


That would save me approx ?750 a year (current annual cost of school lunches for 2 kids at primary school)... I'm assuming that council tax will go up under labout but by that much...???

Full results for ED:


Electorate: 8948


Ballot Papers Issued: 6343


Turnout: 70.9 %

Candidate's Name Party Votes Elected?

Leslie Henry, commonly known as Les, Alden Labour Party [The] 2061 No

James Barber Liberal Democrats 2854 Yes

Louise Margaret Dalton Conservative Party 871 No

Christopher Michael Fish Conservative Party 920 No

Anna Charlotte Goodman Green Party [The] 718 No

Oliver James Kempton Labour Party [The] 1907 No

Derek Charles Kinrade Green Party [The] 436 No

Jonathan Stuart Mitchell Liberal Democrats 2720 Yes

Joan, commonly known as Joani, Reid Labour Party [The] 1952 No

Janet Sam-King Conservative Party 779 No

Rosamund Joy, commonly known as Rosie, Shimell Liberal Democrats 2435 Yes

Lucy Trinder Green Party [The] 572 No


Duly Elected


* James Barber (Liberal Democrats)

* Jonathan Stuart Mitchell (Liberal Democrats)

* Rosamund Joy, commonly known as Rosie, Shimell (Liberal Democrats)

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If dc's figures are right (see above) then that means Labour has a majority of 4 in the council.


Sorry Townleygreen, I am afraid you misunderstood. The extra Labour Councillor in Chaucer takes Labour to 35, LD to 25 and T to 3 - an overall majority of 7 for Labour.

Good news.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...