Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some light entertainment for your morning scan of the internet:

Last night about 10pm my next door neighbor (who lives in the upstairs section of the house and is rarely in) came home and immediately started screaming at the top of her voice something along the lines of:


"I ward you of evil spirit

leave this place" (x3)

[brief pause]

"Holy Spirit" (x3 sung in fast triplets)

[brief pause]

"Holy Spirit" (x3 sung in fast triplets)


and then start all over again.


This was while she was jumping up and down and running all over the flat until 2am. Then the TV came on full blast and was still on when I left for work this morning.


I was so concerned about these evil spirits I stayed awake most of the night to make sure they didn't get me too and thankfully made it unscathed...I think the mantra worked so I'll go thank her if I bump into her.


In full honesty it was maddening cos her living room is right next to our bedroom so we had front row/bed seats to the whole performance; and always do when she pulls wack stuff like this. I'm going to be on the coffee hard today!

It's a commonly held belief that spirit is more likely to play up between the witching hour and 4am. Many reports of poltergeist activity have been reported to my spirit church and they provide regular healing to clear off negative spiritual energy.


If you do get a chance to speak to your neighbour feel free to provide her with my contact details on here and I can have a quiet word next time I am down Eltham.


It's not nice having to deal with poltergeist activity.


Louisa.

So in regards to her health: I think she likes a drink, or whatever else may be her substance of choice. The previous tenant was a crack addict and we used to have all manner of crazies there all times of the day screaming up at her window to let them in; in relative terms this is pretty tame. Still sucks having having whether you get to sleep one night in the hands of other people.
Hard to comment without knowing more about the neighbour as cultural or religious factors (ETA: or reaction to prescribed medication, or some kind of traumatic event) could also be behind it (or maybe the place actually is haunted). Perhaps you could knock on her door and say you were really concerned for her last night as she sounded scared and you wonder if there's anything you can do to help? Her response should give you an idea what's going on. If mental health issues ARE involved, she may already be known to MH services and have a care coordinator or crisis team she can contact.

I think it's a real shame that sometimes we must immediately jump to the logical conclusion and doubt a persons sanity, simply because we choose not to believe in something we don't understand. This poor person could be perfectly rational and experiencing some sort of unexplained phenomena, and yet no one wants to help her explore that route without mockery. It's a very sad world we live in.


Louisa.

Ruffler Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are there any children living at your neighbour's,

> dirac?


No, just a one youngish woman. She's rarely there, sometimes gone for months at a time so never really seen or met her.

If anyone here doubts the existence of spirit, then why don't you test it for yourselves. Sit alone in a dark room with a ouija board, and your finger hovering over the glass or word piece. I guarantee anyone that does this will eventually with patience attract spirit and possibly even communicate. It isn't something I would recommend to people to do, and I certaintly wouldn't touch it after the experiences I've had. But so many doubting Thomas's and nay saying Mary's on this forum that it's the only certain way I can ensure that you'll change your mind.


Louisa.

Saffron Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'll happily do that. No problem whatsoever.


The only problem I'd have is the monumental waste of time...



Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What does 'drop some acid mean'?


LSD... was especially popular "back in the day", I believe..

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's a real shame that sometimes we must

> immediately jump to the logical conclusion and

> doubt a persons sanity, simply because we choose

> not to believe in something we don't understand.

> This poor person could be perfectly rational and

> experiencing some sort of unexplained phenomena,

> and yet no one wants to help her explore that

> route without mockery. It's a very sad world we

> live in.

>

> Louisa.


Sounds to me that for whatever reason this lady felt the need to do a spiritual cleansing of her home.

I'm with Louisa on this...Why must she be crazy?

If she finds comfort and feels safer doing such rituals where is the harm

NewWave Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think it's a real shame that sometimes we

> must

> > immediately jump to the logical conclusion and

> > doubt a persons sanity, simply because we

> choose

> > not to believe in something we don't

> understand.

> > This poor person could be perfectly rational

> and

> > experiencing some sort of unexplained

> phenomena,

> > and yet no one wants to help her explore that

> > route without mockery. It's a very sad world we

> > live in.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

> Sounds to me that for whatever reason this lady

> felt the need to do a spiritual cleansing of her

> home.

> I'm with Louisa on this...Why must she be crazy?

> If she finds comfort and feels safer doing such

> rituals where is the harm



It's the TV that would unnerve me.


Not worried with spiritualism - my Mum was into that :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...