Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"Listen everyone, half the posh folk around here wont be happy until ED has it's own fox hunt chasing through the streets! Most of them are from home counties stock anyhow!" - Louisa, 12.14am


"I am never one to knowingly turn something into a class issue!" - Louisa, 11.30am


All that noise from yobbos has obviously left you in a confused state - time for a lie down?

Anywhere a fox can survive can be considered its "natural" habitat. Like humans they are opportunists, highly adaptable to a range of environments. Yes, they can make a huge racket but think what humans inflict on the rest of wildlife with our fireworks,etc.. Think neutering better than culling but more expensive in short term.


Wanted to add that Reynard also helps keep local mouse and rat population down.

What options are available for neutering? (genuinely interested as I can't see how that's possible)


I'm not suggesting a cull for any noise related reasons btw. The noise they make doesn't bother me. But any vermin which gets above a certain level constitutes a problem. I'm not even saying we are at that level where we need a cull yet


But there aren't a bazillion mice-related threads on here discussing how people and mice can co-exist. Have you ever seen anywhere overrun with vermin??

Someone who once lived in the home counties, and used to fox-hunt told me that the noise you hear is the female screaming in agony during mating, as the male bits and bobs are barbed. (Nature's way of making sure she doesn't run away in case she doesn't fancy him I suppose). I'm sure I saw something vaguely similar in Ann Summers once. (Hey, that's not a shop you'll see opening in Northcross Road anytime soon eh? You can just hear the shrieks of disapproval...)


Anyway, apart from their shit which reallystinks, and for some reason attracts my dog to roll around luxuriating in it, I think they're lovely. We gotta live side by side. Man...

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If we are playing "Urban Noise" Top Trumps - what

> about the prat who thunders about on the

> super-noisy moped?

>

> Eh?


Raise you the lady who treats us to the very loud blare of crap tuuuuuuunes for at least 10 minutes once she has worked out how to park and turn the engine off. Doesn't matter how early or late this is (for added bonus points).

There are quite a few fox rescue places around, I just thought that all the foxes that are bought in injured could be neutered before they are released? I know it will cost money as these are charities, but it may be doable, I too like animals, all animals, but I would rather see them neutered than culled.
Some years back Australia and/or New Zealand were planning to test out a system of laying baits laced with an extended release oral contraceptive as a way of controlling their feral fox population. I left the veterinary publishing field before finding out how that panned out. If they managed to make it work, it would seem a fairly humane option.

Interesting idea.


Personally I've no problem with the foxes. I'm not woken by them, and have no kids, or garden pets to worry about, so I appreciate it's different for some people; I do feel that foxes will go where the food is, though, so if one can be careful about disposing of rubbish, it discourages them.


My mother's a firm fan of them, mind, and tends to put food out in the back garden. My family have always thought of them as rathre beautiful and mostly benign creatures when you see them in an urban setting.

I've had to wear earplugs every night for over a year due to noisy tenants next door. I recommend the wax plugs - get them really soft before inserting and you should be OK.


I don't mind the foxes, yes they disturb me sometimes but at least they don't wake me up at 6am almost every morning. If people were more discerning when disposing of their food waste, there simply wouldn't be the food supply to support the number of foxes and numbers would quite naturally reduce.

I used to get woken up a lot by them in Herne Hill but haven't noticed as many on our road (Worlingham)... not sure if that has something to do with the huge amount of cats there are around, hopefully they do the trick in scaring them off!


They used to sit in the middle of our road in HH and yell at each other, nothing to do with mating, I think it was the young calling their mothers... odd noises, guess it's cause they can't bark!


Definitely more than there used to be but that's because of more food waste and the fact that they have no natural predators (except cars!) and as for them being in their 'natural environment' - well, they're called the 'Urban Fox' for a reason huh?


I think they're gorgeous things, just wish they didn't make such a racket!! :-)

I'm amazed at any sense of tolerance with these little buggers. They don't belong in the city as they don't play an activ part in the food chain, where as in the countryside they'll no doubt have a fair share of rabbits.


They spread disease and why people feed them is beyond me.


We're calling southwark pest control and if they do anything we'll someone licensed to dispose of them.

They don't belong in the city as they don't play an activ part in the food chain, where as in the countryside they'll no doubt have a fair share of rabbits


Foxes do eat worms, but also rodents - it is said that if you have foxes living in your garden you won't also have rats nearbye - which I would consider somewhat of a bonus. They do spread disease, mainly to each other, it must be said - I have heard no evidence of foxes generally spreading disease to humans.


I find birds far more wearisome as to noise, they scream their heads off from first light and even before - many, for instance the corvids, have most unnatractive calls - why don't you want these gone as well? - cities are obviously only for people - nasty wildlife should all be exterminated, they all carry disease, or are noisy, are otherwise irksome.


Personally, I find the fact that comparatively large mammals such as foxes can be wandering about the streets rather heart-warming. Their noise at night I find disturbing only because the screams when first heard sound too human, as soon as I have identified it as foxes I can happily relax. And, unlike human created night noises (shouting, loud music, fireworks) I don't get angry about the foxes being thoughtless and selfish, since they're not. People should know better, foxes shoudn't.

I find it really sad that so many people feel they can't co-exist with the creatures alongside us. I don't see that foxes (or squirrels, or pigeons, or most other animals that get routinely complained about) do us any real detriment - certainly nothing to compare to the damage humans do, even in their local environment (let's start with car pollution, litter, drug waste, graffiti & vandalism, various crap chucked into local water that affects the birds & fish, and food left out that actually encourages the animals complained about here, plus of course the rats). These animals are beautiful, and make our environment more interesting. A little more tolerance and perspective wouldn't go amiss.


London would be a sadder place without its wildlife.


Long live the foxes.

ayresc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm amazed at any sense of tolerance with these

> little buggers. They don't belong in the city as

> they don't play an activ part in the food chain,

> where as in the countryside they'll no doubt have

> a fair share of rabbits.

>

> They spread disease and why people feed them is

> beyond me.

>

> We're calling southwark pest control and if they

> do anything we'll someone licensed to dispose of

> them.



Maybe you should learn some tolerance. They have just as much right to live here as you or me so what gives you the right to decide who, or what needs to be disposed of?

I'm from a farming family so maybe the wrong place to have the debate!


I love animals to bits but these guys are real pests, they don't eat worms or rats, just look at the rubbish they've got to feed on.


Maintaining balance in any environment is fairly critical but in London we're really exposed to it a whole load. Sure someone in the council is trying to sort it and no doubt the intro of wheelie bins has helped.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...