Jump to content

Bother on the 12


Bryan Cocksedge

Recommended Posts

I have just been accosted by a man trying to sell me apple crumble on the no 12 bus. He had it in a paper bag and I could see there were burnt bits round the edges so I told him to clear off. He muttered some swear words under his beath and then sold a slice to a woman sitting opposite. She took one bite and said it was disgusting. I think this man should be stopped before somebody gets food poisoning.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you're right but some people might find it intimidating having a paper bagful of crumble waved in front of their face with a bit of sales patter thrown in for afters. The correct place for this kind of behaviour is in a bakery or at least on a little market stall but not when decent people are minding their own business on the bus!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even think he's making them himself as it looks very similar to the extra large frozen packs you get in Iceland except he's sprinkled something on top to make it more authentic and then chopped it into smaller slices. If I see him again I've a good mind to make a grab for his paper bagful of crumble and fling it out the window.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you sell apple crumble without custard? Or at the very least clotted cream. The vendor should be reported to TfL immediately.


As for rhubarb, disgusting stuff. The Stalk of the Devil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How can you sell apple crumble without custard? Or

> at the very least clotted cream. The vendor should

> be reported to TfL immediately.

>

But KPC, what about public health issues? This country is in the teeth of an obesity crisis. If one is eating dessert on the bus, the only "healthy" accompaniment is surely creme fraiche or perhaps frozen yoghurt.


If eating custard or cream, the rider/diner would be forced to get off several stops early to walk off the fattening effects.



Perhaps the in-bus caterer should start doing fruit salads, now that it's summer.


Mind you a pizza and beer on the long ride home on the number 12 might prove a hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they should convert one of the standing areas into a 'buffet' for the sale of a selection of desserts, fast foods and (alcoholic) beverages. But definitely no rhubarb. Or gooseberries.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Had it been a gooseberry cobbler on the other

> hand...


Oh stop RosieH, would you honestly want a third uninvited person attempting to repair your footwear, while you were on a date?

>

Or a rhubarb fool...


Or even worse, mumble in an actorly fashion, while trying to tell the King the truth, because of course he can't hear you, because you're mumbling.


> Or a plum duff...


It's a plum duff, it's ridiculous. Little Jack Horner 'stuck in his thumb' and furthermore, apparently, 'pulled out a plum'.

That's just plain daft, a thumb is an opposable digit, and it's unlikely the thumb alone would have had the capability of plum-pulling.

Thumb and forefinger?

Now you're talking.

Still...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's a plum duff, it's ridiculous. Little Jack

> Horner 'stuck in his thumb' and furthermore,

> apparently, 'pulled out a plum'.

> That's just plain daft, a thumb is an opposable

> digit, and it's unlikely the thumb alone would

> have had the capability of plum-pulling.

> Thumb and forefinger?

> Now you're talking.

> Still...


Oh Hona, don't be such a tard. The plum is cooked, stoopid - so your thumb goes right in, and then you can pull it out, like a thumbplum lollypop.


You clearly need Woof or someone to give you some cooking lessons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My best description of this shady fellow is of a hairy legged younger Wilfred Bramble with what looks like a tattooed ferret on his forearm. The type you'd keep an eye on if you ran a newsagents. Some may think this is a laughing matter but if he forced his wares on an elderly aunt or a timid neighbour I'm sure there'd be more of an outcry about the apple crumble.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryan Cocksedge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My best description of this shady fellow is of a

> hairy legged younger Wilfred Bramble with what

> looks like a tattooed ferret on his forearm.


Oh, thank Richard Dawkins, for a while there I thought it was me.

When I'm engrossed in my Linda Smith book on the 12, I can be up to all sorts without me knowing about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > It's a plum duff, it's ridiculous. Little Jack

> > Horner 'stuck in his thumb' and furthermore,

> > apparently, 'pulled out a plum'.

> > That's just plain daft, a thumb is an opposable

> > digit, and it's unlikely the thumb alone would

> > have had the capability of plum-pulling.

> > Thumb and forefinger?

> > Now you're talking.

> > Still...

>

> Oh Hona, don't be such a tard. The plum is

> cooked, stoopid - so your thumb goes right in, and

> then you can pull it out, like a thumbplum

> lollypop.

>

> You clearly need Woof or someone to give you some

> cooking lessons.


Sorry RosieH, but a cooked plum just wouldn't attatch itself itself to a thumb in the way you describe.

We scientists have proven so with our slipperiness theory of fruit.

So there, as we in the scientific community usually put it.


But lollypops? Now you're talking, even us white-coated lab-hounds need a break occasionally.

Did you know that sugar-rush thing might not be true, by the way?


Still, mine's a rhubarb and custard Chupa-Chup if you're asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...