Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> By the way ratty, "Spurs couldn't afford

> Tottenham"? I had to read that about 4 times just

> to make sure ;-)



Sorry babes. I was high on lighter fluid and deoderants at the time. Of course I meant Spurs could not afford Johnson, with him being english and all and therefore counting as a homegrown for Europe.

I reckon GJ would be upwards of ?12m. Judas himself was quoted as saying that he was only going for loans was he not? (Not that you can beleive anything that comes out of his lying saggy mouth of course! ;) Would debate whether you would want Johnson to play over Corluka though; who I think is class.


Reckon it's just tabloid crap tho.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hoorah! Kells is a fellow Spur. I thought I was

> the only one on here.


Nope, now there's two! Talking of tabloid crap, I heard a rumour that Redknapp was going to lose O'Hara and Lennon back to Anfield, in a cash + players deal for Keano. Methinks it's more than just Ratty who's been at the lighter fluid!


I'm burying my head and not reading any of it! January will be interesting tho

That would be bonkers Kells wouldn't it. Lennon's doing the business again and O'Hara gets better with every game. Cracking goal against the Hammers. We could do with another forward but I don't think Robbie Keane will be coming back anytime soon. I don't think Harry's got much to spend anyway and will probably wheel and deal in the loan market. Frankly, I don't think we need any of Portsmouth's players apart from Jermaine Defoe.


Ratty.

If memory serves me well, didn't Portsmouth buy Defoe in January of last year? That's 12 months. So we can have him.


Twelve million quid for Johnson! You're having a laugh. Besides once Alan Hutton is back from injury we wouldn't need him anyway.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Will be interesting to see if any Spurs players

> are tempted away to Madrid by Ramos...


Interesting? It would be fucking hilarious. He lost the dressing room for a start and I really don't think there are too many of our players who are good enough to play for Real Madrid.

O'Hara's goal was magic. Can't see any of them going to Real Madrid...half of the problem seemed to be that Ramos, for whatever reason, couldn't get the best out of them here, so why would they go? And yes, I don't think that many of them would be good enough for Real Madrid. Not yet, but I'll enjoy it if they prove me wrong!


I've even started believing in Gomes. And I never thought that would happen. That was probably the highlight of the hammers game for me (well OK, there were two)

> Ratty.

> If memory serves me well, didn't Portsmouth buy

> Defoe in January of last year? That's 12 months.

> So we can have him.

>

> Twelve million quid for Johnson! You're having a

> laugh. Besides once Alan Hutton is back from

> injury we wouldn't need him anyway.



Not correct I'm afraid my love and this is where the confusion is. To push the deal through Jermain came on loan (we were waiting on the Benjani to City deal) we then got dispensation from the FA to finalise the deal later in Feb. He was not allowed to play against Spurs because he was technically on loan. His permanent move being made as soon as June transfer window opened. 12 months will be June 2009.


Johnson is only worth that much cos he is English and therefore counts as homegrown for UEFA quota. Liekwise Defoe, and Crouch. Homegrown players values are gonna inflate even higher as Uefa rules tighten.

Don't think he totally lost the dressing room, Jenas just the other day (before the Madrid news) was saying what a great coach he was, but that a couple of things just didn't work out.


Gossip columns are suggesting he may come in for Zokora...


RE: Defoe, if memory serves, they missed the deadline last January, so he actually went on loan, and was only signed properly in the summer, so the 12 months won't be up... Could be wrong though.


Why would Spurs want him back anyway? He's a decent player, but he was very much 3rd choice behind Keane & Berba, so why ggo back?

I don't think we should have got rid of Defoe in the first place. But there you go, Spurs are the only team who can start the season with Benty on his own, and wonder where all the goals have gone. I think Commolli had more of an impact on Ramos' team than it should have, just because it works on the continent.... But Harry wouldn't put up with that, even if Comolli was still at the Lane.

Changing the Subject...


A thread on another forum I go on (Pompey Fans Online) has made me chortle so I thought I would plagiarize it on here.


What football chants over the year have made you guffaw? My own personal favourite, is, as a young man at the time of the Cleveland Child Abuse scandals, going up to old Ayrsome Park and singing "Get your Kids out for the Dads" at the boro faithful (all 9 of them).


Anyone else????

I see Alex Ferguson has come out with more hostile nonsense, this time saying it's a terrible black mark against the FA for banning Evra for 4 matches after he'd punched an overweight groundsman in the head back in May at Stamford Bridge. Let us not forget that to try and get themselves off the hook United's propaganda machine at first suggested the groundsman had racially abused Evra, that in itself is below the belt and should have been dealt with by the FA.


I can't think of a bigger hypocrite in this country than Alex Ferguson, he'd make a politician blush.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...