Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Was that the one slagging off his next door neighbour and giving the address?!


His other posts seemed quite normal. He must have been very very very drunk :))


Or it could have been a her I guess. Certainly his neighbour was (keep your snotty legs together was part of it, if memory serves :))


And "posh t*at" )

Only ever gonnae be one winner there #AdminsABoss


Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This seems unlikely to end well:

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,1848218

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This seems unlikely to end well:

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,1848218


And it's gone as well now. Admin obviously decided enough was enough on that one.

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?9

> ,1848085


Oh dear. Surely everyone knows by now that on this forum you mention cyclists vs drivers, make a first post complimenting a new business / dissing an existing one or advertise cats entirely at your own risk?


[Edited to correct effing autocorrect]

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > And it's gone as well now. Admin obviously

> decided enough was enough on that one.

>

> Still visible, fwiw, at

> http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cac

> he%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.eastdulwichforum.co.uk%2Ffor

> um%2Fread.php%3F5%2C1848218&oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%

> 2Fwww.eastdulwichforum.co.uk%2Fforum%2Fread.php%3F

> 5%2C1848218&



Sadly that is only a tiny part of the thread, ianr :)

  • 4 weeks later...

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Filed under "Watching brief"

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5

> ,1856347


Do the police actually come for reports of noise/ loud party in Southwark?


I'm just over the border in Lewisham now. Our "noise team" only works 9am-5pm (or thereabouts), and police will not typically attend to sound complaints unless there is a threat of violence.


Just curious. xx

I love the recommendations for Fernando Pinto. All legitimate for sure. I just read them as if they are written in code used by the bored housewives of ED who engage his services...



Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And he's offering "favours" for continued use.

>

>

  • 2 weeks later...

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I love the recommendations for Fernando Pinto. All

> legitimate for sure. I just read them as if they

> are written in code used by the bored housewives

> of ED who engage his services...



Yeah. Agreed. I love these. "Fernando came over and trimmed my bush today leaving me with a real feeling of space and light. He's great with his hands and leaves no mess behind him". "He always has the best tool for the job" etc etc.


Disclaimer: I'm sure Fernando really is a great guy and a good gardener.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...