Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, though not this one - can't a person try to express an objective view without someone implying they're guilty of something? As I've said a couple of times before, I did use the forum before for a time, then had a long break and had to set up a new profile when I eventually came back. Hope that meets with the Inquisition's approval!

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, though not this one - can't a person try to

> express an objective view without someone implying

> they're guilty of something? As I've said a couple

> of times before, I did use the forum before for a

> time, then had a long break and had to set up a

> new profile when I eventually came back. Hope that

> meets with the Inquisition's approval!


Guilty? Inquisition? Hardly, it was a straightforward question which I wouldn't have asked had you not made reference to it in your previous post. Methinks the lady doth protest too much ;-)...

How tedious this is.


I was talking about someone else, not me. By juxtaposing your question with that, ending with an ellipse, you seem to be implying that I am also Blah Blah. No idea if you genuinely thought that or were just stirring. If your intention was to be taken at face value, however, you could have explained your though process and not used the ellipse.


Go and needle someone else. Not interested.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How tedious this is.

>

> I was talking about someone else, not me. By

> juxtaposing your question with that, ending with

> an ellipse, you seem to be implying that I am also

> Blah Blah. No idea if you genuinely thought that

> or were just stirring. If your intention was to be

> taken at face value, however, you could have

> explained your though process and not used the

> ellipse.

>

> Go and needle someone else. Not interested.


Judging by your last but one sentence, you clearly thought the latter.

Once again you come across as overly defensive, only this time with added neurosis, alluding that I was now somehow implying that you're Blah Blah. Go to the previous page and you will see an image I posted that is a visual clue as to who I think Blah Blah is. Here's a clue: It's not you...

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you by any chance smoke weed?



Unfortunately my weed smoking days are over & I've always found the effect of alcohol to be far nicer.


And before you ask.....I'm not drunk either.


RD is right. I wasn't even talking about you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I can't, but I'm sure ChatGPT could, if you ask it! With Windows 11, you can share documents, eg with work colleagues, via a setting. Probably it's the same with iPads etc and the solicitor has accidentally or deliberately shared it with your friend? I'm sure the solicitor can explain it if asked. Hopefully it wasn't an accident!
    • Yes of course a lot of it is total bollocks. And of course the House of Lords is ridiculous. But the class system etc isn't because we have a "royal family", is it?
    • Can't remember where I got them, online somewhere recommended by my daughter, but they are cloth and brightly coloured and fit quite tightly around my nose and mouth. I've still got a stock of them. Tissues inside might help a bit,  but if you have a very runny nose you basically need to keep removing the mask to blow it. Luckily I have only had to go out once when I've had  a bad cold. Sorry, probably too much information.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...