Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, though not this one - can't a person try to express an objective view without someone implying they're guilty of something? As I've said a couple of times before, I did use the forum before for a time, then had a long break and had to set up a new profile when I eventually came back. Hope that meets with the Inquisition's approval!

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, though not this one - can't a person try to

> express an objective view without someone implying

> they're guilty of something? As I've said a couple

> of times before, I did use the forum before for a

> time, then had a long break and had to set up a

> new profile when I eventually came back. Hope that

> meets with the Inquisition's approval!


Guilty? Inquisition? Hardly, it was a straightforward question which I wouldn't have asked had you not made reference to it in your previous post. Methinks the lady doth protest too much ;-)...

How tedious this is.


I was talking about someone else, not me. By juxtaposing your question with that, ending with an ellipse, you seem to be implying that I am also Blah Blah. No idea if you genuinely thought that or were just stirring. If your intention was to be taken at face value, however, you could have explained your though process and not used the ellipse.


Go and needle someone else. Not interested.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How tedious this is.

>

> I was talking about someone else, not me. By

> juxtaposing your question with that, ending with

> an ellipse, you seem to be implying that I am also

> Blah Blah. No idea if you genuinely thought that

> or were just stirring. If your intention was to be

> taken at face value, however, you could have

> explained your though process and not used the

> ellipse.

>

> Go and needle someone else. Not interested.


Judging by your last but one sentence, you clearly thought the latter.

Once again you come across as overly defensive, only this time with added neurosis, alluding that I was now somehow implying that you're Blah Blah. Go to the previous page and you will see an image I posted that is a visual clue as to who I think Blah Blah is. Here's a clue: It's not you...

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you by any chance smoke weed?



Unfortunately my weed smoking days are over & I've always found the effect of alcohol to be far nicer.


And before you ask.....I'm not drunk either.


RD is right. I wasn't even talking about you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...