Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Should women be allowed to wear low-cut tops in business?


Having had a number of business meetings with women who wear low-cut tops, it is most distracting in the environment of a business meeting because most people get distracted from the eye-to-eye contact and you find yourself looking down and gawping at the cleavage. This does not make for good business and I wonder if women do this on purpose and that's why I think it should be banned in the working environment.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/
Share on other sites

It's a vicious circle. Those of us with boobage are encouraged to wear scoop/V necks as being more flattering to our shape. If we were to wear a high necked top, you may be even more distracted since the boobage looks even more pronounced generally.


Alternatively, get a pair of darkish glasses and then no-one will notice where you're looking or take up cycling and go to your meetings in lycra?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345585
Share on other sites

beautyofthebeholder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ur a perve for looking......

> if you are not strong enough and proffessional

> enough to keep eye contact then thats your

> problem...

>

>

> dont see women gazing at ur tiny bulge when they

> talk to you do you...


>

> you perve



What a load of crap. Calling him a perve for doing what nature intended. Why show them off then? Silly person.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345587
Share on other sites

beautyofthebeholder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ur a perve for looking......

> if you are not strong enough and proffessional

> enough to keep eye contact then thats your

> problem...


> dont see women gazing at ur tiny bulge when they

> talk to you do you...

>

> you perve



I think that's a very cheap shot calling me a perve for doing something that is naturally normal for most men. If I was to walk topless into the office showing my naturally rippling, toned, six-packed body, would you equally accuse a woman of being a perve for looking?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345591
Share on other sites

Odyssey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> beautyofthebeholder Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ur a perve for looking......

> > if you are not strong enough and proffessional

> > enough to keep eye contact then thats your

> > problem...

>

> > dont see women gazing at ur tiny bulge when

> they

> > talk to you do you...

> >

> > you perve

>

>

> I think that's a very cheap shot calling me a

> perve for doing something that is naturally normal

> for most men. If I was to walk topless into the

> office showing my naturally rippling, toned,

> six-packed body, would you equally accuse a woman

> of being a perve for looking?


In my experience, people who say things like beautyofthebeholder are usually the most outrageous hypocrites...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345596
Share on other sites

Okay


Just to balance it out a bit in the tits vs cock stare out. There are "packet watchers" out there, I sometimes work with an interior designer in Chelsea & boy she is an unrepentant cock watcher however, I genuinely don't mind ,though I do tend wear firmer fitting trousers when I'm going there so as to distract her. She never quibles the quote, which is nice


Sadly she has nothing in the way of clevage to offer back but hey hoo, there's always the train home



w**F

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345619
Share on other sites

Nope... flattering in general; giving lads a potential eyeful isn't the main aim. I will say that we're talking about DD+ boobage here really.


Basically, if you wear a high necked top (turtle/polo or even a classic T), then, if you've got boobs, they will be massively accentuated since there's just a big wall of chest with nothing to break it up - all you see is the outer curve of the boobs. If you wear a scoop/V-neck, the expanse is broken up and it makes big boobs look more 'average'. Same as why you shouldn't have a T-shirt with sleeves that stop at the line of your boobs - again, it makes that expanse of chest look bigger.


Conversely, small-breasted women do wear the T-shirts/polos since it accentuates what they have more.


Having said all that, there's still a fine line between enough of a scoop neck to improve your appearance and letting it all hang out so that no-one knows where to look. If it's so low that you look like your boobs might fall out at any moment, it's probably too low.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345677
Share on other sites

Odyssey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Having had a number of business meetings with

> women who wear low-cut tops, it is most

> distracting in the environment of a business

> meeting because most people get distracted from

> the eye-to-eye contact and you find yourself

> looking down and gawping at the cleavage. This

> does not make for good business and I wonder if

> women do this on purpose and that's why I think it

> should be banned in the working environment.


my personal opinion, its quite acceptable for the person having the meeting with the person with low-cut top to perhaps occasionally glance at said cleavage.


however.........it would be entirely different if they spent the WHOLE time staring at it and avoiding eye contact, yes?


PS. I think women look at eyes more than anything else...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12438-low-cut-tops/#findComment-345701
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Community payback already exists   https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/community-payback
    • Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...